Posted on September 4, 2025 in beautystandards, beforeandafter, beforeandafterphotos, beliefs, biology, bodyappreciation, bodyimage, calories, challenges, chronichealth, cultoffitness, diet, dietculture, disorderedeating, exercise, fatloss, fitness, fitnessjourney, fitspiration, goal setting, holistic health, hormones, hypothyroidism, influencers, mental health, mentalhealth, mindset, musclegrowth, newyeargoals, nutritionadvice, nutritionalscience, philosophy, physiology, podcast, self-help, socialmedia, socialmediainfluence, stress, thyroid health, weightloss, wellness

Fit for TV: How Screens, Diet Culture, and Reality Shows Rewire Our Bodies and Minds

When Willpower Isn’t Enough: Media, Metabolism, and the Myth of Transformation

You’re listening to Taste Test Thursdays–a space for the deep dives, the passion projects, and the stories that didn’t quite fit the main course. Today, we’re hitting pause on the intense spiritual and political conversations we usually have to focus on something just as powerful: how technology shapes our bodies, minds, and behaviors. We’ll be unpacking a recent Netflix documentary that highlights research and concepts we’ve explored before, shining a light on the subtle ways screens and media program us and why it matters more than ever.

I have a confession: I watched The Biggest Loser. Yep. Cringe, right? Back in 2008, when I was just starting to seriously focus on personal training (I got my first certification in 2006 but really leaned in around 2008), this show was everywhere. It was intense, dramatic, and promised transformation—a visual fairy tale of sweat, willpower, and discipline.

Looking back now, it’s so painfully cringe, but I wasn’t alone. Millions of people were glued to the screens, absorbing what the show told us about health, fat loss, and success. And the new Netflix documentary Fit for TV doesn’t hold back. It exposes the extreme, sometimes illegal methods used to push contestants: caffeine pills given by Jillian Michaels, emotional manipulation, extreme exercise protocols, and food as a weapon. Watching it now, I can see how this programming shaped not just contestants, but an entire generation of viewers—including me.

Screens Aren’t Just Entertainment

Laura Dodsworth nails it in Free Your Mind:

“Television is relaxing, but it also is a source of direct and indirect propaganda. It shapes your perception of reality. What’s more, you’re more likely to be ‘programmed’ by the programming when you are relaxed.”

This is key. Television isn’t just a casual distraction. It teaches, it socializes, and it normalizes behavior. A study by Lowery & DeFleur (Milestones in Mass Communication Research, 1988) called TV a “major source of observational learning.” Millions of people aren’t just entertained—they’re learning what’s normal, acceptable, and desirable.

Dodsworth also warns:

“Screens do not show the world; they obscure. The television screen erects visual screens in our mind and constructs a fake reality that obscures the truth.”

And that’s exactly what reality diet shows did. They created a distorted narrative: extreme restriction and punishment equals success. If you just try harder, work longer, and push further, your body will cooperate. Except, biology doesn’t work like that.

The Metabolic Reality

Let’s dig into the science. The Netflix documentary Fit for TV references the infamous Biggest Loser study, which tracked contestants years after the show ended. Here’s what happened:

Contestants followed extreme protocols: ~1,200 calories a day, 90–120 minutes of intense daily exercise (sometimes up to 5–8 hours), and “Franken-foods” like fat-free cheese or energy drinks.
They lost massive amounts of weight on TV. Dramatic, visible transformations. Ratings gold.
Six years later, researchers checked back: most regained ~70% of the weight. But the real kicker? Their resting metabolic rate (RMR) was still burning 700 fewer calories per day than baseline—500 calories less than expected based on regained body weight.
In everyday terms? Imagine you used to burn 2,000 calories a day just by living. After extreme dieting, your body was burning only 1,300–1,500 calories a day, even though you weighed almost the same. That’s like your body suddenly deciding it needs to hold on to every calorie, making it much harder to lose weight—or even maintain it—no matter how “good” you eat or how much you exercise.

This is huge. It shows extreme dieting doesn’t just fail long-term; it fundamentally rewires your metabolism.

Why?

Leptin crash: The hormone that tells your brain you’re full plummeted during the show. After weight regain, leptin rebounded, but RMR didn’t. Normally, these rise and fall together—but the link was broken.
Loss of lean mass: Contestants lost ~25 pounds of muscle. Regaining some of it didn’t restore metabolic function.
Hormonal havoc: Chronic calorie deficits and overtraining disrupted thyroid, reproductive, and adrenal hormones. Weight loss resistance, missed periods, hair loss, and constant cold are all part of the aftermath.

Put bluntly: your body is not passive. Extreme dieting triggers survival mode, conserving energy, increasing hunger, and slowing metabolism.

Read more:

Understanding the Impact of Diet on Thyroid Health

Personal Lessons: Living It

I know this from my own experience. Between May 2017 and October 2018, I competed in four bodybuilding competitions. I didn’t prioritize recovery or hormone balance, and I pushed my body way too hard. The metabolic consequences? Echoes of the Biggest Loser study:

Slowed metabolism after prep phases.
Hormonal swings that made maintaining progress harder.
Mental fatigue and burnout from extreme restriction and exercise.

Diet culture and TV had me convinced that suffering = transformation. But biology doesn’t care about your willpower. Extreme restriction is coercion, not empowerment.

Read more:

Breaking Free: Escaping the Diet Culture Trap

From Digital Screens to Unrealistic Bodies

This isn’t just a TV problem. The same mechanisms appear in social media fitness culture, or “fitspiration.” In a previous podcast and blog, From Diary Entries to Digital Screens: How Beauty Ideals and Sexualization Have Transformed Over Time, we discussed the dangerous myth: hard work guarantees results.

Fitness influencers, trainers, and the “no excuses” culture sell the illusion that discipline alone equals success. Consistency and proper nutrition matter—but genetics set the foundation. Ignoring this truth fuels:

Unrealistic expectations: People blame themselves when they don’t achieve Instagram-worthy physiques.
Overtraining & injury: Chasing impossible ideals leads to chronic injuries and burnout.
Disordered eating & supplement abuse: Extreme diets, excessive protein, or PEDs are often used to push past natural limits.

The industry keeps genetics under wraps because the truth doesn’t sell. Expensive programs, supplement stacks, and influencer promises rely on people believing they can “buy” someone else’s results. Many extreme physiques are genetically gifted and often enhanced, yet presented as sheer willpower. The result? A culture of self-blame and impossible standards.

Fitspiration and Self-Objectification

The 2023 study in Computers in Human Behavior found that exposure to fitspiration content increases body dissatisfaction, especially among women who already struggle with self-image. Fitspo encourages the internalized gaze that John Berger described in Ways of Seeing:

“A woman must continually watch herself. She is almost continually accompanied by her own image of herself… she comes to consider the surveyor and the surveyed within her as the two constituent yet always distinct elements of her identity as a woman.”

One part of a woman is constantly judging her body; the other exists as a reflection of an ideal. Fitness becomes performative, not functional. Anxiety, depression, disordered eating, and self-objectification follow. Fitness culture no longer focuses on strength or health—it’s about performing an idealized body for an audience.

The Dangerous Pipeline: Fitspo to Porn Culture

This extends further. Fitspiration primes women to see themselves as objects, which feeds directly into broader sexualization. Porn culture and the sex industry reinforce the same dynamic: self-worth tied to appearance, desire, and external validation. Consider these stats:

Over 134,000 porn site visits per minute globally.
88% of porn scenes contain physical aggression, 49% verbal aggression, with women overwhelmingly targeted (Bridges et al., 2010).
Most youth are exposed to pornography between ages 11–13 (Wright et al., 2021).
91.5% of men and 60.2% of women report watching porn monthly (Solano, Eaton, & O’Leary, 2020).

Fitspiration teaches the same objectification: value is appearance-dependent. Social media and reality TV prime us to obsess over performance and image, extending beyond fitness into sexualization and body commodification.

Read more:

From Diary Entries to Digital Screens: How Beauty Ideals and Sexualization Have Transformed Over Time

Netflix Documentary: The Dark Side

Fit for TV exposes just how far the show went:

Contestants were given illegal caffeine pills to keep energy up.
Trainers manipulated emotions for drama—heightened stress, shame, and competitiveness.
Food was weaponized—rationed, withheld, or turned into rewards/punishments.
Exercise protocols weren’t just intense—they were unsafe, designed to produce dramatic visuals for the camera.

The documentary also makes it clear: these methods weren’t isolated incidents. They were systemic, part of a machine that broadcasts propaganda as entertainment.

The Bigger Picture: Propaganda, Screens, and Social Conditioning

Dodsworth again:

“Watching TV encourages normative behavior.”

Shows like The Biggest Loser don’t just affect contestants—they socialize an audience. Millions of viewers internalize: “Success = willpower + suffering + restriction.” Social media amplifies this further, nudging us constantly toward behaviors dictated by advertisers, algorithms, and curated narratives.

George Orwell imagined a world of compulsory screens in 1984. We aren’t there yet—but screens still shape behavior, expectations, and self-perception.

The good news? Unlike Orwell’s telescreens, we can turn off our TVs. We can watch critically. We can question the values being sold to us. Dodsworth reminds us:

“Fortunately for us, we can turn off our television and we should.”

Breaking Free

Here’s the takeaway for me—and for anyone navigating diet culture and fitness media:

Watch critically: Ask, “What is this really teaching me?”
Respect biology: Your body fights extreme restriction—it’s not lazy or weak.
Pause before you absorb: Screens are powerful teachers, but you have the final say.

The bigger question isn’t just “What should I eat?” or “How should I train?” It’s:

Who’s controlling the story my mind is telling me, and who benefits from it?

Reality shows like The Biggest Loser and even social media feeds are not neutral. They are propaganda machines—wrapped in entertainment, designed to manipulate perception, reward suffering, and sell ideals that are biologically unsafe.

I’ve lived some of those lessons firsthand. The scars aren’t just physical—they’re mental, hormonal, and metabolic. But the first step to freedom is seeing the screen for what it really is, turning it off, and reclaiming control over your body, mind, and reality.

Thank you for taking the time to read/listen!

🙏 Please help this podcast reach a larger audience in hope to edify & encourage others! To do so: leave a 5⭐️ review and send it to a friend! Thank you for listening! I’d love to hear from you, find me on Instagram!⁠⁠⁠ @taste0ftruth⁠⁠⁠ , @megan_mefit , ⁠⁠⁠ Pinterest! ⁠⁠ ⁠ Substack and on X!

Until then, maintain your curiosity, embrace skepticism, and keep tuning in! 🎙️🔒

🆕🆕This collection includes books that have deeply influenced my thinking, challenged my assumptions, and shaped my content. ⁠Book Recommendations – Taste0ftruth Tuesdays

Posted on February 4, 2025February 3, 2025 in carbs, challenges, dietculture, disorderedeating, exercise, fitness, fitnessjourney, health, holistic health, hormones, hypothyroidism, masterthebasics, metabolism, misinformation, nuance, nutrition, nutritionalscience, physiology, podcast, science, self-help, socialmedia, veganism, vegetarianism, weightloss, wellness

The Real Story Behind Nutrition Research: Unpacking ‘Statistical Significance’

What You Need to Know About Risk and Bias

If you’ve ever been confused by conflicting diet headlines, you’re not alone! Nutrition research aims to help us understand how different foods impact our health, but the process isn’t always straightforward. From small sample sizes to biases and misinterpreted data, the field is full of challenges that can lead to mixed messages. Today, we’re breaking down the complex world of nutrition research, unpacking what it really tells us, what it doesn’t, and how we can read between the lines to make sense of it all.

This is a complex topic, especially when it comes to understanding terms like absolute and relative risk, which can often be confusing without a visual, so be sure to scroll along as you listen!

Let’s dive in!

I recently sat down with Jacqui, a passionate advocate for empowering women to understand and support their bodies at every life stage. Our conversation was deeply insightful, particularly as Jacqui highlighted the importance of critically assessing nutrition research, an area she’s worked in for years. From her early love for nutrition labels to her background in bio-nutritional statistics and clinical trials, Jacqui’s journey has led her to focus on prenatal research and nutrition that fosters development.

Throughout our interview, Jacqui stressed the need for a more nuanced approach when it comes to nutrition science, pointing out how certain research methodologies and common misinterpretations can lead us astray.

1. The Pitfalls of Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQs)

One of Jacqui’s key points was the reliability—or lack thereof—of Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQs), a tool frequently used to assess dietary habits. FFQs often rely on participants’ memory, which can be imprecise and subjective.

Jacqui shared her firsthand experience collecting FFQ data and witnessing how confused participants often were when asked to recall what they ate. This variability in data collection can significantly impact the accuracy of nutritional studies, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about diet and health.

FFQs, though commonly used in research, often do not capture the full complexity of individual diets. This leads to inaccuracies in studies that can misguide dietary guidelines and public health advice. Jacqui emphasized that this is a critical issue because it directly affects how we understand nutrition and the effectiveness of dietary recommendations.

2. Understanding Relative Risk vs. Absolute Risk in Nutrition Headlines

Nutrition studies often grab attention with sensational headlines, particularly when they report relative risks. Jacqui explained how a “33% increase in risk” can sound alarming, but in many cases, it doesn’t reflect the real picture. The key issue here is the difference between relative risk and absolute risk.

Relative risk refers to the increased risk of a particular outcome in one group compared to another. While this sounds important, it can be misleading without context. For example, a small increase in relative risk might not translate to a significant increase in your actual chance of experiencing that outcome.
Absolute risk, on the other hand, tells us the actual probability of an event happening.

Jacqui stressed the importance of recognizing this distinction when reading nutrition headlines.

A 33% increase in relative risk might sound alarming, but when we examine the absolute risk, the actual impact could be much less significant. Understanding this distinction helps consumers interpret research with greater accuracy, preventing them from falling for misleading headlines.

Swipe through examples here!

Review Jacqui post here to learn more!

3. The Problem with ‘Statistically Significant’ Results

The term “statistically significant” often sounds impressive, but Jacqui warned that it’s not always a reliable indicator of a meaningful finding. In nutritional research, a statistically significant result means that the data supports a specific conclusion beyond what could be expected by chance. However, Jacqui compared this to winning a small lottery: just because the result is statistically significant doesn’t necessarily mean it’s practically important.

In many cases, results that are statistically significant may not have a meaningful or clinically significant impact on real-world outcomes. For example, a study might show a statistically significant difference in health markers between two groups, but the actual difference might be so small that it doesn’t matter in terms of improving health.

When encountering results labeled as statistically significant, Jacqui advised readers to take a step back and ask: Is this result meaningful in the real world, or is it just a statistical fluke?

4. Why Nutritional Research Seems Contradictory

Another fascinating part of our conversation focused on the reasons why nutritional research can often feel contradictory. Jacqui pointed out that factors like small sample sizes, observational study designs, and various biases can skew the outcomes of studies. These variables contribute to conflicting opinions and conclusions in the field of nutrition.

Moreover, biases—whether financial or ideological—can shape the results of studies and the way findings are interpreted. For instance, when a study is funded by a food company, the results might be more favorable toward the products of that company, consciously or unconsciously.

Jacqui encouraged listeners to develop a critical eye when reading nutrition studies. Instead of accepting conclusions at face value, she suggested asking questions like: What’s the sample size? Who funded the study? What biases could influence the results?

5. How to Approach Nutrition Research as an Informed Consumer

So, how should we navigate the sea of nutrition research to make informed decisions about our food? Jacqui’s advice is simple yet powerful: approach nutrition research with a critical mindset.

Here’s how to do it:

Look beyond the headlines: Understand the difference between relative and absolute risk and question whether the findings are clinically significant.
Question study design: Be wary of studies with small sample sizes or those that rely on self-reported data, like FFQs. Also, consider the biases that may influence results.
Seek balanced perspectives: Look for research that examines multiple viewpoints and is not influenced by financial or ideological pressures.

Jacqui’s passion for empowering women through nutrition, particularly prenatal research, shines through in her work. By shedding light on the limitations and complexities of nutrition research, she offers us a much-needed roadmap to make informed decisions about our health. Whether you’re navigating the confusion of wellness trends or simply trying to understand what’s truly healthy, Jacqui’s insights can help us all approach nutrition with more clarity and skepticism.

Want more insights from Jacqui? Follow her on Instagram, where she shares practical advice and challenges the latest trends in wellness.

Learn more about Jacqui

Work with Jacqui: https://www.wellnesswithjacqui.co.za/contact

The lazy cookbook https://www.wellnesswithjacqui.co.za/product-page/the-lazy-cookbook

Women’s health course: https://cominghometoyourself.thinkific.com/courses/coming-home-to-yourself

Stay curious, embrace skepticism, and keep tuning in!

Posted on October 27, 2024 in brainfog, brainhealth, carbs, chronichealth, dietculture, fitness, holistic health, hormones, hypothyroidism, mental health, mentalhealth, mindset, moms, nutrition, physiology, podcast, self-help, stress, stressresilence, thyroid health, vagus nerve, weightloss, wellness

Understanding the Impact of Diet on Thyroid Health

When clients come to me saying they have a “slow metabolism” or a “broken” metabolism, often they think they need to eat even less or cut carbs to jumpstart weight loss. But let me flip the script: in many cases, it’s actually chronic under-eating and restrictive dieting that’s slowing down their metabolism. Chronic dieting, especially with very low calories, can lead to impaired thyroid function and ultimately disrupt how the body uses energy. Here’s how it happens and what you can do to restore balance.

What is the Thyroid and Why Does It Matter?

Your thyroid is a small gland in your neck that plays a massive role in regulating your body’s metabolism. Often called the “controller” of metabolic function, the thyroid works closely with the hypothalamus and pituitary glands in the brain to maintain your metabolic rate. This system allows your body to increase or decrease energy production based on its needs, influencing everything from how you process food to your body temperature.

The thyroid primarily produces two hormones:

T3 (Triiodothyronine) – the active hormone that your cells use.
T4 (Thyroxine) – the inactive hormone that must be converted into T3 before your body can use it.

The production and conversion of these hormones depend on a feedback loop that begins with TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone), which signals the thyroid to produce and release T4. But when the body is stressed—especially due to chronic under-eating or extreme calorie restriction—this whole process can become disrupted.

How Chronic Dieting Wrecks Your Thyroid

Under-eating is a significant source of stress for the body. Dieting or calorie restriction triggers the HPA axis (Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis), leading to an increase in CRH (Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone) and cortisol, our primary stress hormone. High cortisol levels can interfere with thyroid function in the following ways:

Reduces TSH Production: Elevated cortisol inhibits TSH, lowering T4 production and decreasing the amount of thyroid hormone available for energy use.
Impairs T4-to-T3 Conversion: Chronic stress slows down the conversion of T4 (inactive) into T3 (active), reducing your body’s energy production.
Increases rT3 Levels: Instead of converting into T3, some T4 becomes reverse T3 (rT3), a hormone that blocks T3 from being used. This, in turn, reduces the sensitivity of your cells to thyroid hormones, further lowering metabolic function.

This is why individuals who chronically under-eat or yo-yo diet often experience symptoms of hypothyroidism, even without an official diagnosis.

Symptoms of Suboptimal Thyroid Function

If your thyroid isn’t functioning optimally, you may notice some of the following symptoms:

Low body temperature (below 97.8°F)
Frequent feelings of cold, regardless of weather
Low or no libido
Anxiety, brain fog, or poor memory
Unexplained weight gain or difficulty losing weight
Bloating, poor digestion
Changes in hair texture or hair loss

Many clients experiencing these symptoms have been stuck in a calorie-deficit mindset for years, keeping their bodies in a constant state of stress. As a result, they’re often dealing with adrenal dysfunction, hypothyroidism, or even reproductive health issues, like extreme PMS, cycle loss, or low testosterone.

Restoring Your Thyroid Health—The First Steps

To begin improving thyroid health, our initial goal is to support both psychological and physiological balance, moving away from restrictive dieting and focusing on nourishment. Here’s a breakdown of the steps:

Stabilize Blood Sugar: Balanced blood sugar supports thyroid health and reduces stress on the body.
Maximize Nutrient Density: Prioritize whole, nutrient-rich foods to ensure your body receives adequate vitamins and minerals, especially selenium, zinc, and iodine, which are crucial for thyroid function.
Reduce Inflammation: Chronic inflammation can further stress the thyroid. Anti-inflammatory foods and lifestyle practices can help.
Incorporate Breathwork: Simple breathwork techniques can stimulate the vagus nerve, helping to regulate the HPA axis and reduce stress.
Avoid Dietary Triggers: Reduce foods that promote “leaky gut,” such as highly processed foods, sugar, and gluten, if sensitive. This protects your immune and thyroid health.
Manage Stress Proactively: Yoga, meditation, journaling, or spending time in nature can help keep cortisol in check.
Reduce Toxins and Pollutants: Environmental toxins can interfere with hormone health, so minimizing exposure can be a powerful step.
Prioritize Rest and Sleep: Quality sleep allows the body to recover and reset, which is essential for thyroid health.

The Bottom Line

Restrictive dieting isn’t the solution to a slow metabolism; it’s often the root cause. Chronic under-eating can lead to imbalances in your thyroid and adrenal glands, ultimately slowing down your metabolic rate and making it harder to achieve your fitness goals. Rebuilding a balanced, nourished body will not only help you feel better but will also lay the foundation for sustainable health.

This week, we’re talking all things thyroid health, and this post breaks down why breaking free from the dietary dogma of diet culture is crucial! Ever feel like your energy’s tanked, your minds in a fog, or your metabolism’s stuck in slow motion? 🧠✨ You’re not alone, and it could be your thyroid talking.

On this week’s Taste of Truth Tuesdays, we’re joined by Nicole, a holistic health advocate who’s here to shed light on how diet culture’s obsession with restriction can wreak havoc on your thyroid. From her own experience facing an autoimmune diagnosis to her advocacy for individualized nutrition, Nicole breaks down how restrictive dieting not only slows your metabolism but also impacts hormone balance, brain clarity, and overall well-being. Join us to learn how making friends with food (yes, even carbs!) might be the best way to support your thyroid and reclaim your energy.

Posted on August 8, 2024 in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, evolution, faith, fitness, holistic health, mental health, nervous system, new age spiritual, new years resolution, nutrition, physiology, podcast, scripture, self-help, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, Uncategorized, wordofgod, worldview

The Illusion of Control: Neuroscience of Fundamentalism and Diet Culture

Welcome back Wellness Warriors, and truth seekers!

As we have been discussing all of Season 2, Fundamentalist thinking doesn’t just reside in religious circles—it also permeates wellness and healing spaces. Just as high-control religions exploit human vulnerability, so does diet culture.

I’ve had my share of blindly following extreme health regimens recommended by practitioners, ignoring my own discomfort along the way. It became clear that fundamentalism can crop up in various aspects of life, and part of healing is about recognizing and addressing these tendencies within us.

We have discussed how high control religion and diet culture both capitalize on the brain’s tendency to interpret things in a binary black-and-white manner by presenting clear-cut rules, guidelines, and belief systems that simplify complex issues into easy-to-follow directives.

In this post, we’ll exploring deeper into how the brain’s craving for control and the dopamine boost it triggers can explain why people may transition into high-control environments or swing from one extreme to another. Such as moving from a loose, permissive belief system to a strict, rule-bound one, or from an unrestricted eating pattern to a rigid diet.

The Illusion of Control and Dopamine

The concept of the “illusion of control” ties deeply into our brain’s reward system, particularly through dopamine, a neurotransmitter crucial for motivation and learning. When individuals believe they have control over situations, even when that control is illusory, their brains can release dopamine. This release can provide a rewarding feeling, reinforcing the behavior or belief that leads to this sense of control.

The brain’s craving for control plays a crucial role in how individuals respond to structured systems, be it in religion, diet culture, or Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) schemes. When we encounter a belief system or set of teachings that offers clear, structured guidance, it triggers a sense of control, even if that control is illusory. This perceived control is neurologically rewarding because it leads to the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with motivation and the reinforcement of behaviors of control over one’s body and health, triggering dopamine release and creating a feedback loop that encourages continued adherence. Similarly, religious fundamentalism often offers clear-cut guidelines on how to live, providing the same sense of security and control, thus reinforcing the behavior.

This perspective not only sheds light on why people might gravitate towards fundamentalism or diet culture but also opens up a discussion on the broader implications of how our brains can be influenced by the promise of control, even when that control is more perceived than real.

What Causes the Illusion of Control

The illusion of control is driven by several factors and provides psychological benefits.

In health and wellness, people often adhere to strict diets or exercise routines, believing they control their weight or fitness, even though genetics and other factors also play a role. This illusion of control can be comforting and encourage adherence.

Similarly, in religion, individuals may follow rigid rules or rituals, thinking they control their spiritual outcomes or moral status, which provides a sense of security and boosts self-esteem.

When did the concept of the illusion of control originate?

The concept, first described by psychologist Ellen Langer in 1975, was initially seen as a way to maintain self-esteem by attributing success to oneself and distancing from failure. Recent research suggests it results from misjudged causality, where people’s sense of control is distorted by their actions rather than actual influence.

Fundamentalism and Structured Belief Systems

Fundamentalism, with its rigid doctrines and absolute truths, can offer a powerful sense of control, especially for those who have previously encountered ambiguity or lack of structure. These rules provide a clear framework for living, reducing the anxiety that comes with uncertainty, and delivering a dopamine-driven sense of reward that reinforces their commitment to the system. This appeal to control can be understood through several key aspects:

1. Structure and Certainty

Fundamentalism provides a clear and structured framework for understanding the world and one’s place within it. This structured approach often includes strict rules, definitive answers, and a well-defined moral code. For individuals who have experienced the fluidity and unpredictability of hyper-charismatic or New Age movements, the stability offered by fundamentalist systems can be particularly attractive.

In fundamentalist belief systems, every aspect of life is often governed by established doctrines. This comprehensive structure can reduce the anxiety associated with uncertainty and ambiguity, offering a predictable environment where individuals feel they know the correct course of action. This sense of predictability can be a significant source of comfort, as it replaces the confusion and complexity of previous experiences with clear-cut answers.

2. The Illusion of Control and Dopamine

The dopamine-driven reward system plays a crucial role in why fundamentalism is appealing. When individuals adhere to the strict rules and guidelines of fundamentalism, their brain releases dopamine, providing a sense of satisfaction and reinforcement. This dopamine release occurs because the rigid structure of fundamentalism offers a perceived sense of control over one’s life and environment.

This sense of control, even if illusory, can be neurologically rewarding. The anticipation and experience of control lead to the release of dopamine, which reinforces the behavior and belief that adherence to fundamentalist teachings is beneficial. Over time, this feedback loop strengthens individuals’ commitment to the belief system, as the dopamine-driven rewards make the structured environment feel more gratifying and secure.

3. Regaining a Sense of Agency

For those coming from less structured or more ambiguous belief systems, fundamentalism can represent a way to regain a sense of agency and direction. After experiencing a lack of clarity or guidance, individuals may find the definitive answers and rules provided by fundamentalism to be reassuring. The shift towards a more structured belief system can be seen as an effort to reassert control over one’s life and decisions.

Fundamentalism’s clear boundaries and absolute truths provide a stark contrast to the uncertainty that may have characterized previous experiences. This transition can be particularly appealing for individuals seeking to regain stability and predictability. The rigid nature of fundamentalism offers a form of control that feels tangible and dependable, even if it is ultimately based on a set of beliefs rather than empirical evidence.

4. Community and Belonging

Fundamentalist communities often emphasize conformity and collective adherence to their doctrines. This communal aspect can further reinforce the illusion of control by providing social validation and support. Being part of a group that shares the same rigid beliefs can enhance the sense of belonging and reinforce the perceived control individuals feel.

The social reinforcement within fundamentalist groups contributes to the illusion of control by making individuals feel supported and validated in their adherence to the teachings. This communal validation can strengthen their commitment to the belief system, as the positive feedback from the group further activates the brain’s reward system.

5. Cognitive Dissonance and Commitment

Once individuals have invested significant time and energy into a fundamentalist belief system, cognitive dissonance can make it challenging to question or abandon their beliefs. The discrepancy between their initial expectations and any potential contradictions or failures within the system can lead them to double down on their commitment.

The illusion of control provided by fundamentalism makes it psychologically difficult to admit that the system may not offer the promised stability or certainty. This cognitive dissonance drives individuals to reinforce their adherence to the system, as admitting any flaws would undermine the very control and certainty they sought to obtain.

The Illusion of Control in Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) Schemes

Similarly to fundamentalist belief systems, MLMs leverage the illusion of control by presenting themselves as opportunities for individuals to take charge of their own success. Participants are led to believe that their efforts directly determine their earnings and advancement within the company. This illusion can be highly appealing, giving people a sense that their hard work and decisions will lead to tangible rewards.

The prospect of achieving success and the belief that one’s actions are under their control can trigger dopamine release in the brain. When individuals see small successes or receive positive feedback, it reinforces their belief in their ability to control their destiny, making them more likely to continue participating despite setbacks.

MLMs often provide structured guidelines, training, and motivational materials that create a sense of control. Participants are given specific strategies to follow, which can make them feel like they have a roadmap to success. This structure reinforces the illusion that they are in control of their outcomes, even when success largely depends on recruitment and team performance.

MLMs frequently emphasize personal responsibility and self-improvement. They promote the idea that success is a result of individual effort and perseverance, subtly shifting blame for any failures onto the individual rather than the system itself. This reinforces the illusion of control by making participants believe that if they follow the system closely enough, they will succeed.

The social aspect of MLMs, including group meetings, motivational events, and social media communities, can amplify the illusion of control. Participants often see others achieving success and feel motivated by their peers, which can strengthen their belief in their own ability to control their outcomes.

Once individuals have invested time, money, and effort into an MLM, the illusion of control can make it difficult for them to step away. The cognitive dissonance created by the gap between their expectations and reality can lead them to double down on their commitment, further reinforcing their belief in their control over their situation.

The Role of Power in the Illusion of Control

Powerful individuals—including CEOs, politicians, religious leaders, and MLM leaders—often overestimate their control over events beyond their expertise. This inflated sense of control can lead to hubris, risky decisions, and an all-or-nothing approach. For example, a wellness guru who believes they can control all aspects of health through strict regimens may push extreme diets or unproven supplements, driven by the illusion of control. Similarly, a religious leader might impose rigid doctrines, believing they can control or influence every aspect of followers’ lives. This overconfidence and all-or-nothing mindset can result in extreme actions and decisions, as seen when individuals adopt overly restrictive health practices or dogmatic religious rules, ultimately leading them to lose touch with reality.

Appeal to Vulnerable Groups

Studies suggest that no one is immune to the illusion of control—under certain circumstances. Research shows that those who are personally involved in actions are among those most likely to overestimate their influence on the outcome. In addition, the behavior of pathological gamblers is driven by the belief that they can beat the odds of what is demonstrably determined purely by chance.

There are people known to be at low risk of susceptibility to illusory control: those who are depressed. Numerous studies show that depressed people are virtually invulnerable to the illusion of control. They have been found to have less distorted views than the non-depressed across a wide array of perceptions and judgments‑a state of mind that has been labeled depressive realism. They are more likely to see the futility of taking action to influence outcomes. When vulnerable individuals meet a group that offers definitive answers provides the certainty and structure these individuals crave, making them more likely to adopt and adhere to the teachings.

Effects of the Illusion of Control

A sense of control is an adaptive trait linked to better health outcomes, including reduced risk of mortality and diseases, improved physical and cognitive function, and higher life satisfaction. It promotes positive behaviors like exercise and good sleep and enhances optimism and a sense of purpose.

However, the illusion of control can also lead to magical thinking, poor decision-making, and risky behaviors such as gambling, as it may encourage unrealistic beliefs and prevent thorough analysis of situations.

In Summary

Reflect on how the illusion of control might be influencing their own choices and beliefs. Consider whether a sense of control is driving your decisions in areas like health, religion, or business ventures. Understanding this psychological mechanism can empower you to make more informed choices and break free from patterns that may not truly serve your well-being. Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments or join the conversation on our social media channels to explore these ideas further.

Plus, join us this week on the podcast, as we talk with @mburtwrites a talented author and advocate in children’s literature, about faith, parenting styles, and mental wellness. Share your thoughts or join the conversation—let’s explore the impact of the illusion of control together! 💭

🎧here

RESOURCES:

Books:

“The Illusion of Control: Why We Overestimate Our Ability to Control Events” by Ellen J. Langer
- A foundational text by the psychologist who first described the illusion of control.
“Thinking, Fast and Slow” by Daniel Kahneman
- This book delves into various cognitive biases and heuristics, including the illusion of control.
“The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business” by Charles Duhigg
- Explores how habits form and the role of dopamine in reinforcing behaviors.
“The Dopamine Diet: The Complete Guide to Lose Weight, Boost Your Energy, and Live a Happier Life by Rebalancing Your Brain Chemistry” by Neil W. Dhingra
- Focuses on how diet impacts dopamine levels and overall well-being.

Articles and Papers:

“Illusion of Control” | Psychology Today
- An overview of the illusion of control and its psychological underpinnings. Read here
“The Truth About Dopamine and Your Brain” | Psychology Today
- Explains dopamine’s role in motivation and reinforcement. Read here
“Biology of Motivation, Dopamine, and Brain Circuits That Mediate Pleasure” | SpringerLink
- A scientific paper detailing dopamine’s role in motivation and reward. Read here
“The Illusion of Control in the Financial Markets” by E. J. Langer
- Examines how the illusion of control affects decision-making in financial contexts. Read here

Online Resources:

TED Talks
- Search for TED Talks on cognitive biases and the role of dopamine for accessible explanations and examples.
Coursera and edX
- Look for courses on psychology, neuroscience, and behavioral economics that cover these topics in depth.
YouTube Channels
- Channels like CrashCourse and Khan Academy often have videos on psychology and neuroscience that touch on related concepts.

These resources should provide a comprehensive understanding of how the illusion of control and dopamine influence behavior across different contexts.

Posted on July 18, 2024July 18, 2024 in deconstruction, fitness, holistic health, new age spiritual, podcast, scripture, testimonies, worldview

Decoding the Law of Attraction: Myths, Realities, and Societal Impact

Ever wondered how MLMs thrive? Many of them tap into the power of teachings like the law of attraction—convincing you that your thoughts create your reality. It sounds empowering, right? 🤪

But behind the facade lies a darker truth. MLMs manipulate these beliefs to lure in dreamers, promising wealth and success through their products.

So, what’s the scoop? The Law of Attraction says that what you focus on—whether positive vibes or the occasional grumpy thought—can actually manifest in your life. It’s all about tuning into those good vibrations and sending out positive signals to the universe.

The law of attraction is a concept that suggests positive or negative thoughts bring positive or negative experiences into a person’s life. It proposes that focusing on positive thoughts and intentions can manifest desired outcomes.

This idea has roots in various philosophical and spiritual traditions, including New Thought philosophy and the teachings of figures like Ralph Waldo Emerson, William Walker Atkinson, Frank Mesmer, Alexander Downie, and Phineas Quimby.

New Thought holds that God (Spirit, the Infinite, the Divine, our Higher Power) is everywhere; true human self-hood is divine; divine thought is a force for good; sickness, lack and struggle originate in the mind, and “right thinking” has a healing effect.

In other words, “change your thinking, change your life.”

The law of attraction gained popularity in the early 2000s with books like “The Secret” by Rhonda Byrne, touting it as a tool for success, wealth, and happiness.

It’s since influenced self-help, motivational speaking, wellness practices (like yoga and meditation), personal development communities, and has a presence in popular culture and social media, where positive thinking is promoted for achieving goals and bettering life.

“Achieve Success with The Law of Attraction“

The law of attraction is used in wellness communities (fitness, MLM, dieting, spiritual) to promise that positive thinking can manifest goals. However, it can also create unrealistic expectations and oversimplify complex realities.

The teachings of the law of attraction, while promoting positive thinking and goal setting, can also have negative impacts and potential risks:

Blame and Guilt: It may lead individuals to blame themselves for negative experiences, assuming they attracted them due to their thoughts or vibrations.
Unrealistic Expectations: The emphasis on positive thinking may create unrealistic expectations about how quickly and easily goals can be achieved, leading to disappointment and discouragement.
Minimization of Systemic Issues: By focusing solely on individual thoughts and actions, it can overlook systemic barriers and societal inequalities that affect outcomes.
Financial Exploitation: In contexts like MLMs and certain self-help programs, the promise of manifesting wealth and success through the law of attraction can be used to exploit financially vulnerable individuals.
Psychological Impact: For some, the pressure to maintain a positive mindset at all times can contribute to anxiety, guilt, and self-blame when facing challenges or negative emotions.
Dismissal of Negative Emotions: It may encourage the suppression or denial of negative emotions, rather than healthy processing and acceptance of them.
Pseudoscience: The teachings of the law of attraction often lack empirical evidence and scientific support, leading to beliefs and practices that may not be grounded in reality.
Cultural Appropriation: In some cases, the adoption of spiritual or cultural elements (such as indigenous practices) within the context of the law of attraction can lead to appropriation and misunderstanding of their original meanings.

As we explore the impact of belief systems like the law of attraction, it’s clear it shares common pitfalls with high control religion and diet culture—promising transformative change through strict adherence while often neglecting systemic issues and fostering unrealistic expectations.

Join me this week on the podcast as we delve deeper into these topics, uncovering how these ideologies influence our lives and well-being.

Let’s navigate these complexities together and empower ourselves with a balanced perspective.

Posted on July 10, 2024 in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, evolution, faith, fitness, goal setting, holistic health, mental health, nervous system, new age spiritual, newagetojesus, nutrition, physiology, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview, worship music

The Crunchy-to-Alt-Right Pipeline: from Wellness to Extremism

Over the last few weeks, we have been exploring the complex interplay between radicalization, conspiracies and religion. During the pandemic, I was one of those new-age rebels that was pumped into conspiracy and conversion to religion pipeline. I was one of those people seeking answers and meaning that was drawn to radical ideologies and conspiratorial narratives that promised belonging, purpose, and empowerment.

A huge aspect of my deconstruction process is realizing how I’ve been susceptible and caught up in cult-like dynamics for most of my adult life. I spent years entangled in an MLM (2016-2020), which only worsened my dis0rded eat1ng behaviors from high school. These products often promoting unrealistic body standards and fostering unhealthy relationships with food. Feeling lost without that community, I was drawn into pandem1c conspiracies and eventually into high-control religion.

The “crunchy hippie to alt-right pipeline” is a phenomenon where individuals initially attracted to alternative wellness and New Age practices become increasingly exposed to far-right ideologies.

This shift is facilitated by social media algorithms and influential figures who blend wellness content with conspiracy theories and extremist views. This shift is facilitated by social media algorithms and influential figures who blend wellness content with conspiracy theories and extremist views.

Key Points of the Pipeline:

Algorithmic Influence:
- Social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram use algorithms that can gradually expose users to more extreme content. For instance, someone watching videos on natural health remedies might eventually receive recommendations for videos that include far-right conspiracy theories or anti-establishment rhetoric (Virginia Review of Politics).
Overlapping Values:
- Certain aspects of New Age and wellness cultures, such as skepticism of mainstream medicine and government, overlap with the distrust and anti-establishment sentiments of far-right groups. This makes the transition smoother as the ideologies can appear to support each other (Cross Cultural Solidarity).
Influential Figures:
- Wellness influencers who propagate conspiracy theories (like QAnon) help bridge the gap between New Age communities and far-right ideologies. They often present themselves as offering alternative truths, which can be appealing to those already disillusioned with conventional systems (Cross Cultural Solidarity).
Community Dynamics:
- Online communities play a crucial role. Individuals often seek validation and a sense of belonging in these groups. Once part of a community that blends wellness with far-right views, it becomes easier to accept and internalize these extremist ideologies (Virginia Review of Politics) (Cross Cultural Solidarity).

Implications:

Radicalization: This pipeline can lead to the radicalization of individuals who initially joined wellness communities for benign reasons but gradually adopt extremist views.
Polarization: The spread of far-right ideologies within wellness spaces contributes to societal polarization and the mainstreaming of conspiracy theories.
Public Health Concerns:
- Misinformation and Hesitancy towards “BigPharma”
  Social media platforms have been conduits for the dissemination of misinformation regarding 💉, leading to hesitancy. False claims about safety and conspiracy theories have undermined public health efforts.
- Addressing these public health concerns requires a multi-faceted approach that includes combating misinformation, improving mental health services, addressing healthcare inequities, ensuring continuity of chronic disease management, strengthening public health infrastructure, and promoting evidence-based health practices. Public awareness and education, policy reforms, and community engagement are essential in tackling these challenges and improving overall public health outcomes

Conclusion:

Understanding this pipeline is essential for recognizing how seemingly unrelated interests in wellness and spirituality can be co-opted by extremist ideologies. It highlights the need for vigilance and critical thinking in online spaces, as well as the importance of promoting credible information and fostering inclusive communities. For more detailed discussions on this topic, you can refer to articles from sources like the Virginia Review of Politics and Cross Cultural Solidarity (Virginia Review of Politics) (Cross Cultural Solidarity).

Posted on June 18, 2024June 18, 2024 in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, faith, fitness, goal setting, holistic health, mental health, nervous system, nutrition, physiology, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, worldview

Beyond Dogma: Wellness & Religion’s Striking Parallels

Welcome back to Taste0ftruth Tuesdays Wellness Warriors and truth seekers!

Listen here 🎧

Fundamentalist thinking doesn’t just reside in religious circles—it also permeates wellness and healing spaces. Just as high-control religions exploit human vulnerability, so does diet culture.

High control religion and diet culture both capitalize on the brain’s tendency to interpret things in a binary black-and-white manner by presenting clear-cut rules, guidelines, and belief systems that simplify complex issues into easy-to-follow directives.

Clear Rules and Regulations:

High Control Religion: Provides rigid doctrines, moral codes, and commandments that delineate right from wrong, good from evil, and righteous from sinful.
Diet Culture: Promotes strict dietary regimes, cleanses, and “good” vs. “bad” foods, categorizing eating behaviors as virtuous or detrimental.

In both of these contexts, this black-and-white thinking oversimplifies complex issues related to spirituality and health, offering a sense of clarity and control in exchange for individual autonomy and critical thinking.

I used to be fixated on healing, always chasing the next fix. When I later dove into a high-control religion, this perpetual quest for self-improvement morphed into the religious ritual of sanctification—an equally exhausting endeavor.

Healing should be about presence, connection, and truly living—not an endless pursuit of perfection.

Have you noticed this shift in your own or others’ healing journeys?

Here are some examples of fundamentalist thinking and behaviors found in both high-control religions and wellness/healing spaces:

Aspect	High-Control Religion	Wellness Spaces
Strict Rules and Regulations	Rigid doctrines and moral codes with severe consequences	Strict dietary regimes or detox plans with inflexible guidelines, labeling deviations as harmful or sinful
Authority Figures	Centralized figures with unquestionable teachings	Gurus or practitioners whose advice is taken as absolute truth
Us vs. Them Mentality	Clear divisions between the “righteous” and “sinful” outsiders	Labeling foods, behaviors, or people as “clean” or “toxic,” fostering an in-group/out-group mentality
Fear-Based Tactics	Fear of damnation or punishment to maintain control	Instilling fear of illness or toxins to enforce adherence to wellness practices
Exclusive Truth Claims	Belief that their interpretation of faith is the only truth	Claiming their diet or lifestyle is the only path to true health and well-being
Shame and Guilt	Using shame and guilt to enforce compliance	Shaming individuals for not adhering to specific diets or wellness protocols
Community Pressure	Intense pressure to conform within the community	Social pressure to adhere to specific wellness practices, with fear of ostracism for non-compliance
Promised Rewards	Promises of spiritual rewards or salvation for adherence	Promises of optimal health or purity through strict adherence to wellness practices

Fundamentalist thinking and behaviors found in both

Seeking Clarity during Stress

Gravitating towards fundamentalism after experiencing hyper-charismatic or new age movements can seem understandable. The strict rules and structure provide a perceived sense of safety. Particularly during times of stress and uncertainty, we can gravitate towards the need for a sense of control & structure. However, this rigidity and extreme control often lead to increased trauma over time.

As I deconstruct from the Christian faith, I am re-evaluating beliefs, questioning long-held doctrines, and confronting the challenges faced within spiritually abusive environments.

Fundamentalism’s rigid adherence to traditional beliefs and practices can create significant challenges, fostering environments that can stifle personal freedom, promote division, and sometimes lead to conflict and violence. We also see intolerance towards individuals or groups who hold different beliefs or lifestyles, leading to discrimination, ostracism, or even violence towards perceived “outsiders” or “heretics.”

This is due to the dogmatism, this fundamentalist ideology tends to promote rigid, inflexible interpretations of religious or ideological principles, discouraging questioning or exploration of ANY alternative viewpoints.

Fundamentalists are often resistant to change and innovation within religious doctrine or practice, viewing such developments as departures from true faith.

I recently shared a post on Instagram, reflecting on my journey of deconstruction and exploring progressive spaces, I’ve noticed a concerning trend: the lack of nuance and the prevalence of an ‘us vs. them’ mentality.

Even within progressive Christianity, there’s pressure to conform to certain social norms and ethical behaviors. Disagreement is often met with resistance, and group identity politics can dominate discussions.

Please review this blog for more information and resources: Understanding Fundamentalism: Rigid Beliefs, Division, and Psychological Impact I am hoping these resources provide comprehensive insights into the dangers of fundamentalism, illustrating its potential to foster intolerance, social division, and conflict

Understanding these parallels helps us recognize and challenge fundamentalist thinking in all areas of life, promoting a more balanced and critical approach to wellness and healing, and JUST EXISTING!

Let’s move away from the dualistic thinking and judgment that these ideologies promote, and instead, embrace a more holistic and compassionate path forward.

That’s all I have for you today folks! Thanks again for listening/reading. Next week, we will continue the conversation breaking from Diet Culture and for future episodes:

•Dr. Mark Gregory Karris, author of The Diabiological Trinity Healing Religious Trauma from a Wrathful God, Tormenting Hell & a Sinful Self, Religious Refugees: (De)Constructing Toward Spiritual and Emotional Healing and more
•@neilyvanneily is a philosopher and cognitive scientist known for his work in the intersection of religion, cognition, and culture. He holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from Princeton University. We will be discussing his new book- “Religion as Make-Believe,” which offers a thought-provoking analysis of the nature of religious belief and its role in human societies.

•@mburtwrites To discuss Biblical Counseling & a little bit of the evolution of Christian parenting, along with Kelsey McGinnis, they offer a comprehensive exploration of the historical, cultural, ideological, political, and social factors that have influenced Christian parenting over time.

@carielmoore to discuss Franciscan theology: which focuses on simplicity, poverty, and love for all. Inspired by Saint Francis, it’s about imitating Christ and caring for the marginalized. 🌿 she also explores parenting through the lens of spirituality, theology, and childhood liberation ✨

and MORE! Until then, maintain your curiosity, embrace skepticism, and keep tuning in! 🎙️🔒

Have a great week!

🙏 Please help this podcast reach a larger audience in hope to encourage others! To do so: leave a 5⭐️ review and send it to a friend! Thank you for listening! I’d love to hear from you, find me on Instagram!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @taste0ftruth⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Pinterest!