For many, the term “deconstruction” has come to represent a deeply personal process of questioning inherited beliefs, especially in the context of religion. While there’s no official “deconstruction community,” it has become a popular buzzword online, flourishing in spaces like Instagram, TikTok, and podcasts. (The New Evangelicals,Dr. Pete Enns (The Bible for Normal People), Eve was framed,Jesus Unfollower, Dr. Laura Anderson just to name a few.) These platforms provide room to question everything and dismantle rigid systems of belief—at least in theory.
But what happens when these communities become echo chambers of their own? Instead of fostering true intellectual freedom, the deconstruction movement often serves as a pipeline into new forms of dogma. Rather than encouraging critical thinking, it frequently replicates the same tribalism and groupthink that so many participants are trying to escape.
This is not growth. It’s trading one set of chains for another.
From Evangelicalism to Progressive Extremism
It’s ironic: people leave far-right evangelical Christianity believing they’ve found freedom, only to stumble into another extreme—progressive leftist ideologies. Why does this happen?
To understand this, we need to step back and look at human nature. Political scientists have found that public opinion is shaped far more by group identity than by self-interest. As Jonathan Haidt explains in The Righteous Mind, politics is deeply tribal. We’re hardwired to align with groups, not necessarily because they offer truth, but because they provide belonging.
This tribal impulse is magnified in the context of deconstruction. Many who leave evangelical Christianity are grappling with disillusionment, loss, and a hunger for community. For some, the progressive left offers a sense of safety and a clear moral framework, mirroring what they once found in their faith. The partisan brain, already trained to see the world in “us versus them” terms, naturally clings to another tribe rather than embracing the discomfort of uncertainty.
Research even suggests that extreme partisanship may be addictive. Our brains are rewarded for performing the mental gymnastics that protect us from beliefs we don’t want to confront. This dynamic—coupled with the fear of being ostracized by a new community—creates an environment where dissenting voices are silenced, and ideological purity becomes the new gospel.
Woke Ideology as a Secular Faith: A Closer Look
John McWhorter argues that wokeism functions like a full-fledged religion. It provides a moral framework that mirrors traditional religious beliefs. Instead of concepts like original sin, wokeism offers “privilege,” positioning those with it as morally compromised. In place of rituals like prayer, adherents perform acts like confessing their biases. And, similar to the salvation promised in traditional religions, salvation in wokeism comes through activism and striving for societal change. For McWhorter, this structure offers a sense of moral clarity and purpose, but the movement’s refusal to tolerate dissent makes it dangerous. He suggests, “What we’re seeing isn’t a quest for justice but a demand for unquestioning orthodoxy.”
Keep your eyes 👀out for that blog post, for it will be coming soon, and it will be called “Oh Woke night, The Sacred Beliefs of the Left”
Fragility and the “Three Great Untruths”
The allure of the deconstruction space isn’t just about leaving religion; it’s about embracing a new narrative. But narratives, like dogmas, can distort reality when they’re based on false premises. Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt explore this in their book The Coddling of the American Mind, identifying three “Great Untruths” that have come to dominate cultural discourse:
“What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker.”
“Always trust your feelings.”
“Life is a battle between good people and evil people.”
These untruths encourage fragility, discourage critical thinking, and foster an “us versus them” mentality. They create a world where discomfort is seen as harmful, emotions override evidence, and disagreement is equated with moral failure.
Sound familiar? For anyone who grew up in evangelical circles, these patterns mirror the same rigidity and moral absolutism they left behind. And yet, these same traits are now pervasive in parts of the deconstruction space. This creates an ironic cycle: people flee one form of oppression, only to adopt another, packaged in new language but rooted in the same fear-based thinking.
One of the most seductive ideas in the deconstruction movement is the belief in reason as the ultimate guide to truth. On the surface, this sounds like an antidote to dogma. But here’s the catch: reason isn’t the unbiased tool we like to imagine.
French cognitive scientists Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber argue that reasoning didn’t evolve to help us discover truth. Instead, it evolved for argumentation—to persuade others and protect our own beliefs. This explains why confirmation bias isn’t just a quirk of human psychology; it’s a feature of our argumentative minds.
As individuals, we’re not wired to produce open-minded, truth-seeking reasoning—especially when our identity or reputation is on the line. This is why intellectual and ideological diversity is so important in any truth-seeking community. Without it, reasoning becomes a tool for reinforcing tribal loyalty, not uncovering deeper truths.
The philosopher John Stuart Mill captured this in On Liberty, arguing that free speech and open debate are essential for discovering truth. Mill believed that truth isn’t static or simple; it emerges when differing perspectives clash, forcing ideas to be tested, refined, and strengthened. Worshiping reason as an infallible guide is, in itself, a kind of faith—one as flawed and potentially dangerous as religious dogmatism.
The Rise of the Fake Intellectual
2020 and the pandemic didn’t just disrupt our lives; it disrupted how we think about authority and expertise. Franklin O’Kanu, in his Substack UNORTHODOXY, describes the emergence of a new archetype: the “fake intellectual.”
These individuals position themselves as ultimate authorities, wielding data and studies to validate their perspectives. But often, their arguments lack intellectual rigor. They cherry-pick evidence, appeal to emotion, and create the illusion of expertise without true depth.
In the realm of public health and pharmaceuticals, there’s a well-documented phenomenon known as the “revolving door” between regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. This term refers to the cyclical movement of personnel between roles as regulators or policymakers and positions within the industries they oversee.
What Is the Revolving Door?
The revolving door concept highlights a pattern where high-ranking officials from organizations such as the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) transition into influential roles within pharmaceutical companies, and vice versa. This fluid movement raises critical questions about the integrity and impartiality of regulatory oversight.
The deconstruction space is fertile ground for this phenomenon. Disillusioned individuals, hungry for guidance, are particularly vulnerable to voices that seem authoritative. But the rise of fake intellectuals doesn’t just mislead; it stifles genuine curiosity and critical thinking, replacing one form of blind faith with another.
A Call for Intellectual Diversity
If the goal of deconstruction is freedom, then it must embrace intellectual diversity. True growth happens when we allow our ideas to be challenged—when we resist the urge to label dissenters as enemies and instead engage with them in good faith.
This is why Mill’s defense of free speech is more important than ever. Truth isn’t found in the safety of ideological purity; it’s forged in the discomfort of debate. Communities that discourage dissent are not liberating—they’re suffocating.
Conclusion: Toward True Freedom
Deconstruction should be a crossroads, not a pipeline. It’s an opportunity to question everything—including the ideologies we’re tempted to adopt in place of the ones we’ve left behind.
To truly grow, we must embrace complexity, engage with opposing perspectives, and remain humble in the face of our own limitations. The path to freedom isn’t about finding the “right” tribe—it’s about stepping beyond tribes altogether and seeking truth with courage, curiosity, and an open mind.
Bonus Episode: Reflections on the Election Cycle – A Message for the Deconstruction Community
Welcome to today’s deep dive into a topic that’s been stirring within me for months. If you’re new here, let me explain the deconstruction space, or the deconstruction community—a movement that’s gaining momentum for those of us disentangling ourselves from rigid, fundamentalist beliefs. This process is supposed to be healing and, ideally, a source of growth, but it’s not without its share of controversy. That’s what we’re here to talk about.
In my podcast episode titled Faith Unbound: Navigating the Process of Disentanglement—or rather, Deconversion after my own journey took a deeper turn—I discussed my initial discovery of this space back in February. At that point, I’d begun to question my former beliefs, and the deconstruction community felt like a safe haven. After 6-7 months in, I’m seeing patterns that are unsettlingly familiar. The community has been valuable, yet I’ve grown concerned as it increasingly mirrors the same kinds of rigidity and tribalism many of us were trying to escape.
My posts and Instagram reels have hinted at this frustration, but I’m here today to pull these thoughts together more fully. Moving away from one dogma only to embrace another feels to me, like a new form of entrapment. The craving for certainty and “the right side” is strong, and without realizing it, we’re swapping one rigid system for another. In this space that’s supposed to champion open-mindedness, judgment and exclusion seem to have replaced curiosity and true critical thought.
It’s a reminder that true growth and change happen only when we’re open to different perspectives—not quick to label those who disagree with us as enemies. As the philosopher John Stuart Mill argued in his 1859 work, On Liberty, Free speech is essential for discovering the truth. He believed true understanding and truth itself emerge only through open debate and free expression. This highlights the complexity of truth, it’s only when differing perspectives clash that ideas are refined and strengthened. Let’s explore how that idea relates to today’s topic.
Setting the Stage: The Political and Psychological Landscape
Before we dig into the deconstruction community, let’s set the stage with something I found really interesting. Back before the 2024 election, journalist Mark Halperin expressed some serious concerns on Tucker Carlson’s podcast (cue the BOOs and HISSS from all the progressives–I hear you!) about what would happen if Trump were to win a second term. He predicted widespread psychological distress, especially among Democrats, which would affect everything from mental health to social interactions. And, wow, did that hit the mark.
Since Trump’s victory, movements like the 4B movement have surged among women on social media, particularly in response to reproductive rights concerns and conservative gender roles. Originating in South Korea, the movement’s name, “4B,” stems from “B,” shorthand for “no” in Korean, symbolizing “No sex, No dating, No marrying men, and No children.” Recently, the movement has sparked a 450% increase in Google searches in the U.S., with many calling it the “4 Nos” or referencing “Lysistrata” for its radical stance against traditional gender expectations. I’ve shared my thoughts on traditional gender expectations in a previous episode.
The Blue Bracelet Movement: Solidarity or Performative Gesture?
Following the 2024 election, white women supporting Kamala Harris have rallied around an unexpected symbol: a blue bracelet. For many, it represents allegiance, a small but visible way to signal “I’m not with them” to women who voted for Trump. But like other quick-fix political symbols, it’s raising questions: Does this bracelet truly contribute to progress, or is it merely performative—a way to sidestep deeper, tougher conversations within their communities?
The trend echoes past symbolic movements like 2017’s “pussy hats,” which aimed to unify and empower but were later criticized for their lack of sustained action. Today, similar critiques have emerged around the bracelet, with critics suggesting it’s more of a comforting gesture for its wearers than a true commitment to change. Some Black activists and allies have pointed out that symbols alone aren’t enough; they want allies willing to challenge and change the beliefs of those around them, including friends and family who may hold differing views.
Could the Blue Bracelet Movement become a lasting emblem of allyship or fade as a passing trend? Its fate rests on whether those wearing it step up to engage in hard conversations and meaningful action.
Misinformation and Its Impact on Abortion Laws
But let’s get back to deconstruction—and something that’s been coming up a lot lately, particularly within that space: misinformation about abortion laws. Here’s the thing: there is no federal abortion ban in place. I repeat, NO federal abortion ban.
The Trump administration’s role in the overturning of Roe v. Wade has sparked fierce debates on both sides, but it’s important to clarify that the administration never stated it aimed to eliminate abortion nationwide. Instead, the ruling simply returned the power to regulate abortion to individual states. Some conservative figures have even used quotes from Ruth Bader Ginsburg to suggest she supported a more gradual, state-based approach. However, Ginsburg critiqued the federal approach, arguing a more state-focused shift could have garnered broader public support for gender equality. Polls consistently show that while many Americans support the legality of abortion, most also favor restrictions—especially in later stages of pregnancy. This nuance, however, often gets lost in campaign rhetoric, which is typically framed in absolute terms to galvanize voter turnout. But as we’ve seen, such messaging has not always yielded the intended results, revealing the complexity of public opinion on this issue.
Yes, the Roe v. Wade decision was overturned, but all that did was give states the power to regulate abortion. Some states have restrictions, sure, but no federal law is imposing a nationwide ban. And without a massive shift in Congress and the courts, it’s unlikely that will happen.
I don’t think it will. Trump himself has spoken out against that. His wife has spoken for protecting these in some way, shape or form. We have other folks coming over from the Democratic Party under this Unity Party bracket. I just don’t think that they’re going to force Christian nationalism, and abortion bans across the entire nation. I guess we’ll see.
Then, there’s this idea going around that women won’t be able to access life-saving procedures if they have a miscarriage. This is just false. In fact, most states with abortion restrictions still allow medical treatments for miscarriages, like dilation and curettage (D&C), which are essential to protect a woman’s health. What’s actually being restricted are elective abortions—not necessary procedures.
But here’s where things get really tricky. The spread of these exaggerated claims taps into the emotional centers of our brains. If you remember our previous episodes, we talked about amygdala hijacking—the brain’s response to fear and anxiety. When we hear these alarmist claims, it triggers that fear-based reaction, shutting down our ability to think rationally. Instead of focusing on the facts, we’re just reacting emotionally.
The Dangers of Misinformation
Let’s talk about the danger of this. Misinformation, especially when it involves highly emotional issues like reproductive rights, isn’t just harmless chatter—it’s psychological warfare. It keeps people in a constant state of anxiety, preventing them from thinking rationally. The real issue? People are more likely to believe in the fear-based narrative than to actually check the facts. They’re too busy being triggered emotionally.
This plays directly into the hands of the fearmongers. It becomes easier to control a population if you can make them afraid, right? And what do we see happening? Misguided campaigns around “miscarriage care,” the spread of exaggerated stories, and people feeling like their rights are under direct attack. It’s chaos. And it’s all based on misinformation, yet the ones who are screaming the loudest about misinformation are the very ones spreading it.
Can you already hear the echoes of evangelicalism? This brings me to the concepts of Jonathan Haidt’s the Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion because they apply here. Haidt explains how our moral intuitions drive our beliefs and politics, often dividing us along different moral foundations.
Many folks in the deconstruction space, now lean left, where values like care and fairness are paramount. Meanwhile, conservative values like loyalty and authority are often viewed as suspect, fostering an “us vs. them” mentality that can feel righteous but alienating. Ironically, in striving for freedom and empathy, the deconstruction space sometimes ends up falling into the same black-and-white thinking it critiques.
In tandem, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s book The Coddling of the American Mind offers a useful framework for understanding these shifts, identifying “Three Great Untruths”: 1) “What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker,” 2) “Always trust your feelings,” and 3) “Life is a battle between good people and evil people.” These untruths, they argue, create fragility, discourage critical thinking, and foster a tribal mentality—traits that increasingly characterize the deconstruction space and parts of the progressive left.
It’s ironic to me that some people leave evangelical Christianity thinking they’re free, only to stumble into a new form of dogma within the deconstruction space. My experience is different—I didn’t grow up in the church but was recruited during the pandemic. Having lived outside of purity culture, I feel fortunate not to carry that baggage. While I empathize with those navigating their journeys, it’s tough to see them act as critics and bullies. Let’s unpack these dynamics by exploring three key untruths in this space.
1. The Untruth of Fragility: “What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker.”
For many, deconstructing from fundamentalist beliefs took resilience and a willingness to confront discomfort. Yet, in today’s deconstruction space, there’s an emphasis on avoiding ideas seen as “unsafe” or “harmful”—typically anything that deviates from progressive orthodoxy. and I mean, I genuinely felt this way. I think that might be somewhat of a trauma response. I was like, I hate the patriarchy. I must stand up against this. This is harmful. This is dangerous. And there is a lot of data proving that this isn’t true, whether we want to look at the history of the ancient church or just, you know, the research data that I’ve shared in previous episodes but my point–this fragility, reinforced by social media algorithms, cultivates an environment where disagreement feels threatening rather than enriching.
This approach mirrors the fundamentalist rejection of “dangerous” secular ideas, where dissent is demonized. The irony is that what began as a call for open-mindedness has become a kind of brittle certitude, one that isolates rather than connects. Instead of learning resilience, we’re re-teaching fragility, limiting our growth and deepening the ideological chasm.
Protestors outside a Temple of Satan
2. The Untruth of Emotional Reasoning: “Always trust your feelings.”
Fundamentalism often equates strong feelings with truth—“If I feel it, it must be right.” In the deconstruction space, there’s a similar emphasis on emotional reasoning. If something feels offensive or unsettling, it’s treated as harmful. This approach is amplified by social media, where outrage and personal offense are rewarded with visibility.
Haidt’s work reminds us that emotions shape our moral judgments but don’t always lead to truth. Reacting purely on feeling closes off critical thinking, creating echo chambers where alternative perspectives are rarely considered. Instead of fostering deeper understanding, emotional reasoning entrenches our biases, fueling judgment rather than curiosity.
3. The Untruth of Us vs. Them: “Life is a battle between good people and evil people.”
The most divisive untruth is the idea that the world can be split into “good” and “evil” camps. This is evident in how some in the deconstruction community approach politics and social issues, painting conservatives or moderates as morally inferior. We see a rigid, “with us or against us” mentality, where anyone who questions progressive narratives is labeled “deplorable,” “harmful,” “Trash”, “Nazi” or worse.
Haidt’s research reveals that moral division is natural; we all tend to view those who disagree with us as misguided or even morally flawed. But when we approach every difference as a moral battleground, we close off true dialogue. Coming from a high-Calvinist church—one of the most cult-like, fundamentalist circles you can get into—I know what it’s like to think the rapture is imminent or to believe that if you don’t say all the “right” words exactly, you’ll burn in hell. My journey has taken me from being pro-choice in Portland, OR, having had three abortions myself, to joining an abolitionist movement to outlaw abortion. I haven’t even spoken about the profound pain and regret I carry about this. Yet here I am, reflecting on how divisive our society has become, with so little room for understanding across political lines. In the deconstruction space, you’d expect a shared empathy after leaving behind rigid belief systems, but instead, the culture seems to mirror the very exclusivity and “us vs. them” mentality of evangelical spaces.
Living in Portland, surrounded by ideologies that often pushed the limits of what I felt was morally comfortable, I wrestled with the impacts of various movements. I started to question whether certain messages of empowerment—like third-wave feminism—truly uplift or, instead, encourage behaviors that commodify women’s bodies and promote sexualization from a very young age. And while sex work has become a celebrated concept under the mantra “sex work is real work,” my own painful experiences in that industry make me see things differently. To me, it’s not empowering; it’s the opposite. Instead of championing it, I believe we should work to dismantle the industry.
It’s not just isolated concepts; there’s a broader pattern of glorifying “anything goes” hedonism and dismissing traditional values in the progressive space, which I find deeply troubling. Living in that environment left me with a raw understanding of how damaging these ideologies can be, leaving permanent scars. I grieve over the three abortions I’ve had. I cry because, despite being told it was just “a clump of cells,” I knew it was more than that. Watching the left demand “trust the science” while denying that life begins at conception feels twisted to me.
Moreover, there’s a deep, dark history in the advocacy of reproductive rights that gets glossed over—like the disturbing eugenics past of Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger. Are we just going to ignore that?
Since the last election ended with a Trump landslide victory, rather than sparking any self-reflection, this moral absolutism seems to have intensified. The comments sections on many deconstruction accounts reveal the same tribal thinking they claim to oppose. Instead of creating bridges, we see entrenched sides, instead of open-mindedness, we see judgment.
Look, I’ve been there. I was a proud Democrat in the past. I voted for Obama. But now, as an independent, I’m calling it like I see it. Democrats need to take a good hard look at themselves if they want a chance at victory. Blaming the electorate isn’t the answer. You cannot keep denying biology and pretending men. Along in women’s sports, restrooms or prisons. The idea that kids should undergo irreversible changes. It’s misguided and is absolutely out of touch. The open border agenda. It’s hurting American workers, pushing down wages and driving up the cost of housing. When will you start protecting your own people instead of pandering to these extreme policies? Discriminating against whites, Asians and men and the name of countering past wrongs is not only setting us back, but it’s racist in itself. Abandoning merit-based selection is wrecking our economy and opportunities for everyone. I mean, you cannot let people camp, defecate and shoot up in public spaces and expect things to improve. The average voter is seeing all of this and they’re rejecting it. If Democrats want to win again, they need to rethink their approach and get back to reality. Enough is enough.
The Pipeline Problem: How Social Media Radicalizes
This divide is worsened by social media, where algorithms favor outrage and tribalism, pulling people toward extreme ideologies. Just as researchers have observed a “crunchy hippie to alt-right pipeline,” there’s a similar dynamic at play in progressive spaces, where folks in the deconstruction space are drawn into radical social justice ideologies that feel every bit as dogmatic as evangelicalism.
In this progressive pipeline, identity politics becomes a weapon, and moral purity is enforced through a power/victim binary that discourages complexity and invites fear of being labeled an oppressor. This kind of ideological purity resembles the control and certainty we experienced in evangelicalism, only now with a new political coat of paint.
And this leads me into the horseshoe theory suggests that the far-left and far-right, though seemingly at opposite ends of the spectrum, often mirror each other in attitudes and tactics. This theory, initially presented by French philosopher Jean-Pierre Faye, proposes that the extremes of any ideology may end up behaving similarly—both tending toward authoritarianism and totalitarian thought despite their stated differences. Although this theory has its critics, the broader concept of ideological mirroring holds up in our analysis of what’s happening in the deconstruction space. At first, it was all about freedom—breaking away from oppressive systems, rejecting dogma, and embracing openness. But ironically, as people deconstruct their faith, they can fall into a similar trap: from being free thinkers to members of a new ideological cult.
Basically, when you leave fundamentalism without fully deconstructing dogmatic thinking, you risk trading one rigid ideology for another. Without cultivating humility and empathy, we will perpetrate the very same cycles of judgement and exclusion.
The Path Forward: True Openness and Curiosity
What’s the solution here? Jonathan Haidt’s insights remind us that real dialogue begins by understanding the values behind other people’s beliefs, even if we disagree with them. Progress and healing require that we listen beyond the labels, engaging in good faith rather than moral grandstanding. If we are to avoid replicating the very structures we’re deconstructing, we need to make space for differing perspectives and approach them with curiosity.
So, this means you cannot demonize conservatives, you cannot call everyone that voted for Trump a bigot, racist, misogynist. There’s something wrong with that thinking. You have been sold these three untruths. It’s a tired accusation that doesn’t hold up when you look at the numbers. Trump support among white voters did drop from 57% in 2020 to 49% in 2024. But the kicker is his support among black and Latino voters actually went up from 38 to 42%. So, against all odds, Trump is doing something that the Democratic Party has failed to do for decades. He’s making the Republican Party more diverse than has been in 60 years. Let’s cut out the divisive name calling and start acknowledging the reality of his growing appeal across different communities.
Real change happens when we go beyond just labeling others and instead build spaces where critical thought can flourish—even when it’s uncomfortable. This is my message to the deconstruction community and beyond!
It’s simple: stop pretending that we have all the answers. True freedom of thought is not about certainty. It’s about curiosity. It’s about asking the tough questions, not just parroting whatever’s trendy on social media or echoing the louder voices in your ideological group.
We need to do away with the binary thinking that divides us into “good” or “evil,” “us” or “them,” and start embracing true diversity of thought. Only by having those uncomfortable, nuanced conversations will we ever break free from the ideological cults—whether they’re rooted in religion, politics, or even deconstruction itself.
So, as we wrap up today’s episode, remember this: It’s time to get real. Misinformation is everywhere, and sometimes, it’s coming from the very people who claim to be fighting it. Whether it’s the left, the right, or the deconstruction space—don’t get caught up in the hype.
Thanks for tuning in to Taste of Truth Tuesdays. Until next time, keep questioning, keep learning, and never, ever stop thinking for yourself.
Welcome to Taste of Truth Tuesdays, where we unravel the strange, the mysterious, and today—the terrifying. This post delves into one of history’s darkest chapters: the witch hunts. We’ll explore how fear, superstition, and control shaped centuries of persecution and how these patterns are still evident in the modern world. Witch hunts aren’t just a thing of the past—they’ve evolved.
The European Witch Hunts – Early Modern Europe
Let’s start in early modern Europe. Scholar Peter Maxwell-Stuart illuminates the rise of demonology, where the fear of magic and the devil became a weapon of control for those in power. Beginning in the 1500s, political and religious leaders manipulated entire populations by tapping into their deep-rooted fears of ‘evil forces.’ The Church, in particular, weaponized these beliefs, positioning itself as the protector against witches—women (and sometimes men) believed to consort with devils or conjure dark forces. As the idea took hold that witches could be behind every famine, illness, or death, this created a perfect storm of paranoia.
Stuart argues that demonology texts—many sanctioned by the Church—fueled mass hysteria, feeding the narrative that witches were not just local troublemakers but cosmic agents of Satan, hell-bent on destroying Christendom. Ordinary people lived in constant fear of betrayal by their neighbors, leading to accusations that could swiftly escalate into brutal trials, with the accused often tortured into confessing their ‘diabolical’ crimes.
To understand how demonology in Europe gained such traction, we need to go back to Augustine of Hippo. We have mentioned him before in previous episodes, whose writings in the 4th and 5th centuries laid the foundation for Christian perceptions of the devil and demons. Augustine’s ideas, especially in City of God, emphasized the constant spiritual warfare between good and evil, casting demons as agents of Satan working tirelessly to undermine God’s plan. He argued that humans were caught in this cosmic battle, susceptible to the devil’s temptations and tricks.
‘Augustine before a group of demons’, from ‘De civitate Dei’ by Augustine, trans. by Raoul de Presles, late 15th Century
Augustine’s Doctrine of Demons
According to Augustine, demons were fallen angels who had rebelled and now sought to deceive and destroy humanity. While Augustine didn’t explicitly discuss witches, his interpretation of demons helped fuel the belief that humans could be manipulated by evil spirits—whether through pacts, possession, or magical practices. This idea later influenced medieval and early modern European demonology.
Augustine’s views on original sin—that humanity is inherently flawed and in need of salvation—also intensified fears that people, especially women (who were seen as ‘weaker’ spiritually), were more vulnerable to the devil’s influence.
SIDE NOTE: We have discussed the theological concept of original sin in previous episodes: Franciscan wisdom navigating spiritual growth and challenges with Carrie Moore, we specifically spun the doctrine of original sin on its head and then also Unpacking Religious Trauma: Navigating the Dynamics of Faith Deconstruction with Doctor Mark Karris.
In the centuries that followed, these ideas were weaponized to justify witch hunts. Augustine’s legacy is evident in how later theologians and demonologists, such as Heinrich Kramer (author of the infamous Malleus Maleficarum), built upon his ideas of demonic interference to condemn witchcraft as a real, existential threat to Christian society.
Maxwell-Stuart reveals that the creation of demonology wasn’t just religious but deeply political. Kings and clergy alike realized they could consolidate power by stoking the flames of fear, casting witches and sorcerers as a common enemy. The trials served a dual purpose: they reinforced the Church’s supremacy over the spiritual realm and gave ruling elites a tool for maintaining social order. Accusing someone of witchcraft was an effective way to silence dissent or settle personal scores.
Fear as a Tool of Control
Fear wasn’t just manufactured by rulers—it was deeply ingrained in the societal, religious, and legal systems of the time. Scholar Sophie Page reveals how beliefs in magic and the supernatural were not fringe ideas but core components of medieval and early modern life. Magic wasn’t merely a mysterious force; it was a pervasive explanation for any calamity. Failed harvests, plagues, or unexplained illnesses were often attributed to witches or the devil, creating a society constantly on edge, where supernatural forces were believed to lurk behind every misfortune.
By embedding these beliefs into legal codes, authorities could target suspected witches or sorcerers under the guise of protecting the community. Page’s work illustrates how rituals once seen as protective or healing gradually became demonized. Harmless folk practices and herbal remedies, used for centuries, began to be recast as witchcraft, especially when things went wrong. People, particularly those in rural areas, were vulnerable to this thinking because religion and superstition were inseparable from daily life.
Partisan scholars have long debated whether Catholics or Protestants were the “real” witch hunters, but they’ve made little headway. One important change in Christian morality, as discussed by John Bossie, occurred between the 14th and 16th centuries. The moral focus shifted from the Seven Deadly Sins—pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, anger, and sloth—to the Ten Commandments. This change, influenced by reform movements that shaped the Protestant Reformation, prioritized sins against God over those against the community. Idolatry and the worship of false gods became viewed as the gravest offenses.
This redefinition of witchcraft followed suit. Instead of being seen as harmful actions toward neighbors, witchcraft was now linked directly to devil worship and regarded as serious heresy. Scholars and church leaders began merging various forms of folk magic and healing into this new narrative, suggesting that practitioners were either knowingly or unknowingly making deals with the devil. Confessions of pacts or attendance at “witch gatherings” were shaped to highlight community failings, like envy and resentment. Consequently, educated society began to see witchcraft as a real threat rather than mere superstition. While traditional beliefs about magic still existed, they were overshadowed by fears of violent backlash from reformers.
The Power of Dualistic Thinking
This dualistic thinking, influenced by St. Augustine, gave rise to a semi-Manichean worldview, where the struggle between good and evil became more pronounced. Manichaeism, an ancient belief system, viewed the world as a battleground between equal forces of good and evil. Although orthodox Christianity rejected this dualism, the focus on the devil’s role in everyday life blurred those lines for many people. By emphasizing the devil’s pervasive influence, religious leaders inadvertently created a belief system in which evil seemed as powerful as good.
In this semi-Manichean view, the devil was not just a tempter of individuals but a corrupting force within communities and even within political and religious practices deemed heretical. Fears of devil-worshipping conspiracies became intertwined with anxieties about witchcraft and moral decay. Reformers, particularly in Protestant movements, fueled these fears by branding idolatry, Catholic rituals, and even folk healing as dangerous openings for the devil’s influence. This perspective transformed witchcraft from a local issue into a broader threat against God and society.
The result was a potent mix of dualistic thinking and an intense focus on spiritual warfare. This not only intensified the persecution of supposed witches but also reinforced the obsession with eliminating anything considered “satanic.” The ideological shift redefined witchcraft as a communal danger, turning innocent healing practices into accusations of demonic pacts.
Every village had its own ‘cunning folk’—individuals skilled in healing and folk magic—yet these very people could easily become scapegoats when something went wrong. The legal structures played a vital role in perpetuating this cycle of fear. Church courts, bolstered by theologians and demonologists, were empowered to try individuals accused of witchcraft, and the accusations quickly spiraled into mass hysteria. Trials often relied on tortured confessions, reinforcing the belief that witches and the devil were real and tangible threats to society. This institutionalized paranoia was a perfect storm of religion, fear, and control.
The Rise of Organized Witch Hunts
Beginning in the late 15th century, witch trials escalated into full-blown hunts, particularly after the publication of the Malleus Maleficarum in 1487. This infamous witch-hunting manual, written by Heinrich Kramer and endorsed by the Pope, offered legal and theological justifications for hunting down witches. It encouraged harsh interrogations and set guidelines for identifying witches based on superficial evidence like birthmarks, behaviors, and confessions extracted under torture. The legal system, which had already started to turn against folk healers, now had a codified method for persecuting them.
In regions like Germany, Scotland, and Switzerland, these legal trials turned into widespread witch hunts. Hundreds, even thousands, of individuals—predominantly women—were accused and executed. What’s particularly fascinating is that these witch hunts often peaked during periods of societal or economic instability when fear and uncertainty made people more susceptible to attributing their misfortunes to external, supernatural forces.
By institutionalizing the persecution of witches, rulers and religious leaders could manage social unrest and solidify their authority. The trials often reinforced the power structures by demonstrating that anyone perceived as a threat to societal order—whether through suspected witchcraft or merely social nonconformity—could be eradicated.
Witch Hunts and Gender
The scapegoating of women played a crucial role in these witch hunts. Owen Davies’ work reveals how the demonization of witches intersected with misogyny, turning the hunts into a gendered form of control. Midwives, healers, or outspoken women were more likely to be targeted, reinforcing patriarchal authority. The very skills that had once been valued, such as healing and midwifery, were redefined as dangerous and linked to dark powers.
As witch hunts spread, the legal frameworks across Europe became more refined and institutionalized, creating a climate where fear of witches and demonic possession became the norm. The trials’ obsession with confessions—often coerced under brutal conditions—further fueled public paranoia, as the more people confessed to witchcraft, the more tangible the ‘threat’ seemed.
The Modern Echoes of Witch Hunts
Fast forward to today, and we find that the legacy of witch hunts lingers. The tactics of fear-mongering, scapegoating, and social control can still be observed in modern contexts. Contemporary movements often mirror historical witch hunts, targeting marginalized groups through accusations and public shaming. Just as witch hunts flourished in times of societal uncertainty, modern societies can succumb to similar dynamics.
In the age of social media, legal accusations spread like wildfire, and the court of public opinion often acts faster than the courts themselves. Political enemies are dragged through the mud with allegations that may or may not have a basis in fact.
The case of Michael Jackson serves as a poignant example of how media narratives can distort reality. The beloved pop icon faced multiple allegations of child molestation, with the most notable case occurring in 2005 during a highly publicized trial. Accusers claimed that Jackson had abused them, yet the defense presented compelling counterarguments, including challenges to the credibility of the witnesses and highlighting inconsistencies in their testimonies. After a lengthy trial, Jackson was acquitted of all charges, but the media frenzy surrounding the case fueled public debate and sensationalism, earning him the derogatory nickname “Wacko Jacko.” This smear campaign perpetuated false narratives about his character and actions. Behind the scenes, Jackson was embroiled in a lawsuit against Sony Music, a battle he was reportedly winning at the time of these allegations. Furthermore, his controversial doctor, Conrad Murray, who administered drugs to Jackson, faced serious legal consequences for his role in the singer’s death, including manslaughter charges. The intersection of these legal battles and the media frenzy created a complex narrative that ultimately tarnished Jackson’s legacy, and that’s what truly breaks my heart.
By the time these individuals have the chance to clear their names, their reputations—and often their careers—are already in ruins. Davies’ research shows us that while modern witch hunts don’t involve burning at the stake, they do involve trial by media and mob justice.
And we can’t talk about modern-day witch hunts without bringing the CIA into the conversation. Since its inception, the CIA has been at the heart of international political manipulations—using covert methods to shape public perception, interfere in foreign governments, and even influence elections here in the United States. In the 1960s, the agency coined the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ to discredit anyone who questioned the official narratives surrounding events like the assassination of JFK. Those who didn’t toe the line were labeled as ‘paranoid’ or ‘dangerous.’ It was the modern version of labeling someone a witch—turning them into a social outcast, not to be trusted.
Fast forward to today: we see similar tactics used against whistleblowers, journalists, and activists who challenge the powerful. Think about Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, and even political figures targeted by intelligence communities. The second they start exposing uncomfortable truths, they are vilified. Whether through leaks, smear campaigns, or selective legal action, these modern-day ‘witches’ face an onslaught of accusations, designed to discredit them before they can fully tell their story.
In many cases, the evidence behind these accusations is shaky at best. The CIA’s involvement in manipulating public perception goes all the way back to Operation Mockingbird, a secret program to influence media narratives, which showed that controlling information was one of the most powerful tools they had. During the Cold War, the United States engaged in a concerted effort to influence and control media narratives to align with its interests, which involved recruiting journalists and establishing relationships with major media outlets.
Edward Bernays, often referred to as the father of public relations, played a pivotal role in these discussions on media manipulation. Working with several major companies, including Procter & Gamble, General Electric, and the American Tobacco Company, Bernays was instrumental in promoting the cigarette brand Lucky Strike, famously linking it to the women’s liberation movement. His connections extend to notable figures like Sigmund Freud, who was Bernays’ uncle, Freud’s psychoanalytic theories significantly shaped Bernays’ PR strategies. Throughout his career, Bernays leveraged media to influence public perception and political leaders, raising profound questions about the power dynamics of media and its capacity to shape societal narratives. (If you’re intrigued by the intricate interplay of media and propaganda, this is a rabbit hole worth exploring!)
Today, that same fear-mongering tactic is played out on a much larger scale. Accusations, whether of conspiracy, treason, or subversion, become tools to silence anyone questioning the status quo. Just as witches in the past were seen as ‘different’ and thus dangerous, today’s targets are often people who challenge the system.
And while throughout the 1300-1600s, there was no due process for the accused witches, today, we see something similar in the digital realm. There’s no real accountability or fairness in the court of public opinion. All it takes is a viral accusation—a tweet, a blog post, or a video—and the person’s career, family, and mental health can be obliteratedovernight. No evidence required, no trial, no defense.
So, what can we learn from this history? From the witch hunts of early modern Europe to today’s viral accusations and political fearmongering, there’s one key lesson: fear remains one of the most dangerous tools of control. When we allow fear to dictate our actions—whether it’s fear of witches, outsiders, or anyone who doesn’t fit into the mold—we lose sight of reason and humanity.
In closing, I’d like to examine the phenomenon of witch hunts through the lens of amygdala hijacking, a topic we discussed in a previous episode. This term refers to the brain’s immediate response to perceived threats, where the amygdala—the emotional center of the brain—takes control, often resulting in irrational and impulsive actions.
During the witch hunts, communities gripped by fear of the unknown succumbed to a mob mentality whenever someone fell ill or misfortune struck. The amygdala triggered a fight-or-flight response, compelling individuals to find scapegoats, with cunning folk and those deviating from societal norms becoming prime targets. As accusations spiraled, fear dominated decision-making instead of rational thought. Today, we observe similar patterns in how social media can incite panic, leading to modern witch hunts. When fear takes over, reason often fades, resulting in unjust vilification—echoing the dark lessons of history.
As we navigate our modern world, let’s remain vigilant against the echoes of this history, seeking truth and questioning the narratives that shape our beliefs. Fear may be powerful, but curiosity and critical thinking are our greatest allies in maintaining our autonomy and humanity.
Resources:
Briggs, Robin. Witches and Neighbors: The Social and Cultural Context of European Witchcraft. Oxford University Press, 1996.
This book provides a comprehensive exploration of the social dynamics surrounding witch hunts in early modern Europe, highlighting the interplay of fear, community, and cultural beliefs.
Maxwell-Stuart, Peter G.Witchcraft in Europe, 1100-1700: A Sourcebook. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
This sourcebook compiles essential documents related to the history of witchcraft in Europe, providing insights into how fear and persecution were constructed and justified.
Page, Sophie.Magic in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
This book offers an analysis of the cultural and religious practices surrounding magic during the medieval period, emphasizing how these beliefs shaped societal attitudes toward witchcraft.
Bossy, John.Christianity in the West, 1400-1700. Oxford University Press, 1985.
Bossy examines the transformation of Christian morality during the Reformation, providing context for the changing perceptions of witchcraft and heresy.
Davies, Owen.Popular Magic: Cunning Folk in English History. Continuum, 2007.
This work explores the role of cunning folk—those who practiced folk magic—and how their practices were perceived within the broader context of witchcraft accusations.
Baroja, J. C.Witches and Witchcraft. University of California Press, 1990.
Baroja’s work examines the historical and cultural significance of witchcraft, providing insights into the social conditions that fueled witch hunts and the cultural implications of these beliefs.
🎙️ Welcome Back! Join me as I chat with Katherine Spearing, MA, CTRC — founder of Tears of Eden 🌸, a nonprofit supporting survivors of spiritual abuse, and former host of the groundbreaking Uncertain podcast 🎧. Katherine is also the host of Trauma & Pop Culture, a Certified Trauma Recovery Practitioner 🧠, and an expert in helping those who have survived cults, high-control environments, and sexual abuse 💔. She even offers specialized trauma-informed career coaching 💼!
In this episode, we discuss: 💡 The most impactful themes from Uncertain — including her powerful episode with Dr. Laura Anderson on anger 😡 and the concept of second-wave fundamentalism. 🎭 How creative arts therapies are aiding survivors of sexual abuse in their healing journey, and how these methods differ from traditional therapy 🎨. 🛑 Managing the emotional weight of working with spiritual abuse survivors and Katherine’s personal journey to avoid burnout 🧘♀️. 👩🎤 Challenging traditional gender roles in Christianity — how they’ve shaped perceptions of women’s worth and agency, and steps for creating more inclusive spaces 🚺. 🛡️ Building healthy community dynamics to protect against spiritual abuse while fostering authentic, supportive connections 🌱. 🔥 A sneak peek into Katherine’s upcoming book on spiritual abuse, including why the church is so obsessed with sex 💭.
Tune in now for an insightful conversation on healing, resilience, and challenging the status quo! 🗣️✨
Don’t miss out on Katherine’s wisdom and unique perspective. 🎧
🙏 Please help this podcast reach a larger audience in hope to edify & encourage others! To do so: leave a 5⭐️ review and send it to a friend! Thank you for listening! I’d love to hear from you, find me on Instagram! @taste0ftruth or Pinterest!
At the beginning of my journey into multi-level marketing (MLM), I felt an overwhelming sense of serendipity. Like many others, I was drawn into the promise of freedom, financial independence, and the power of owning my own business. That initial excitement felt so right, I even got a “trust the process” tattoo to anchor myself in the belief that I was on the right path. But the deeper I delved into this world, the more I realized the complexities and underlying control tactics that defined it.
Reflecting on my early days in the MLM space, I can’t help but think of how magical the thinking felt. I truly believed I was guided into the opportunity. But as time went on, the inconsistencies, emotional manipulation, and exploitative nature became impossible to ignore. It’s been a journey of grieving that magical thinking—something I now understand as part of a coercive, controlling system designed to keep me chasing an illusion.
Brandie, my guest on this episode, shares a similar experience. As a mother, writer, speaker, and advocate, she’s been at the forefront of exposing MLMs as commercial cults, wellness scams, and even legalized labor trafficking. She has spoken extensively about how her journey, which started with serendipity, eventually led her to scrutinize MLMs more critically. Her insights reflect the emotional complexity many face when disentangling from these organizations.
Here are some key aspects of our conversation:
The Magical Thinking Trap: Both Brandie and I felt an initial sense of serendipity, which was reinforced by the community and mentors telling us to “trust the process.” This belief system is intentionally nurtured in MLMs to keep participants emotionally invested.
Leveraging Credentials: We discussed how MLMs often leverage the credentials and influence of professionals like doctors, nutritionists, and influencers to give the illusion of legitimacy. Brandie emphasized how this tactic makes MLM pitches more persuasive, especially to vulnerable individuals seeking validation.
The “Mother” Angle: Brandie shared how MLMs often target mothers, using manipulative language that preys on their desire for financial freedom and the ability to work from home while caring for their families. The messaging can be so powerful that mothers internalize guilt and blame when they don’t succeed, despite the system being rigged against them.
Unpaid Labor and Emotional Manipulation: We delved into how MLMs strategically manipulate participants into performing unpaid labor, like attending large-group-awareness trainings or MLM conferences, under the guise that these events will lead to success. This creates a cycle of emotional dependency on the MLM structure.
Coercive Control Beyond the Home: Brandie highlighted the growing movement to criminalize coercive control, not just in domestic environments but also in online groups and commercial cults, including MLMs. Canada’s Bill C-332 and California’s SB 1141 are steps toward addressing this kind of manipulation in non-physical forms.
Misleading Social Media Practices: MLMs are notorious for using social media posts to bait others into joining, often hiding the true nature of the opportunity behind attractive lifestyle imagery and vague promises of success.
Paid Certifications as Funnels: Another tactic we discussed is the use of paid certifications and courses as entry points to recruit others into MLMs or similar for-profit groups, disguising recruitment as personal development.
Power Dynamics and Influence: Brandie warned about individuals in positions of power, like pastors or healthcare professionals, who pitch MLM opportunities using their influence, creating a dangerous overlap between authority and exploitation.
Bait-and-Switch in Non-Profits: Some MLMs use non-profit organizations as fronts to recruit members, exploiting charitable intentions for financial gain.
Brandie’s Substackrecently covered how Canada’s Bill C-332 and California’s SB 1141 aim to combat coercive control. These laws recognize that coercion doesn’t always result in physical harm but can have long-lasting emotional and psychological effects. Extending these protections to online and commercial environments, like MLMs, is a crucial step toward addressing the hidden abuse happening in plain sight.
MLM Compensation Plans
For those unfamiliar with how MLMs work, here’s a breakdown of their typical compensation plans, which all hinge on recruitment:
Binary: You recruit two people, who recruit two more, forming a pyramid. You earn based on the sales and recruits of those beneath you.
Unilevel: You can recruit as many people as possible, with everyone directly under you. You earn a percentage of sales from your downline.
Forced Matrix: There’s a limit to how many people you can recruit directly, so recruits are placed under others in your team, further embedding the hierarchical structure.
Although MLMs claim that participants can make money from sales alone, true financial gain only comes from recruiting others. Companies avoid pyramid scheme accusations by paying bonuses on downline commissions rather than direct recruitment. Still, this setup exploits participants, most of whom will never see a living wage.
MLM Profitability
Studies and reports paint a grim picture for those involved in MLMs:
FTC Report: According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), approximately 99% of MLM participants end up losing money.
Profit Sources: Success in MLMs often hinges on recruiting new participants rather than selling products to consumers, which creates a structure where the majority are positioned at the bottom, struggling to make a profit.
When it comes to making a profit, the comparison between lottery odds and MLM (multi-level marketing) success rates reveals a stark reality: both paths are fraught with significant financial risk, but MLMs typically offer even lower chances of profitability.
If you’re evaluating an MLM opportunity, watch out for:
Deceptive earnings claims
Manipulative recruitment tactics disguised as “personal development”
High-pressure tactics to attend unpaid events
Cult-like devotion to leadership or the company itself
As Brandie and I peeled back the layers, it became clear that MLMs are not just financial traps—they are systems of coercive control designed to exploit both financially and emotionally. With legal movements like Bill C-332 gaining traction, there’s hope that MLMs and similar organizations will finally face the scrutiny they deserve.
Grieving the magical thinking days has been bittersweet. In some ways, it was easier to believe in the serendipity, but now, stepping into a space of scrutiny offers greater growth and clarity. In that sense, the journey may be more challenging, but it’s also far more rewarding.
How MLMs and high-control religions exploit narratives to control and isolate
As we have discussed in a previous blog post, in both MLM companies and high-control religions, sophisticated methods of narrative control and emotional manipulation are used to maintain adherence and deflect objections. These organizations craft carefully curated stories of success, empowerment, and belonging, reinforcing a strong sense of group identity while discouraging critical thinking. Objections are met with pre-scripted narratives designed to dismiss doubts and isolate dissenters, creating environments where questioning becomes taboo.
By understanding the parallels between these two worlds, we can begin to recognize the underlying tactics used to manipulate emotions and maintain control. Whether it’s an MLM promising financial freedom or a religious group offering spiritual salvation, the emotional hooks are the same: they both rely on your commitment to their carefully constructed reality. Breaking free means reclaiming your own narrative, embracing skepticism, and fostering critical thought in the face of pressure to conform.
🙏 Please help this podcast reach a larger audience in hope to edify & encourage others! To do so: leave a 5⭐️ review and send it to a friend! Thank you for listening! I’d love to hear from you, find me on Instagram! @taste0ftruth or Pinterest!
Here are some of the best resources for learning more about commercial cults and anti-MLM movements:
Books:
Ponzinomics: The Untold Story of Multi-Level Marketing by Robert L. FitzPatrick – This book provides a thorough exploration of MLMs and their business structures, helping readers understand how they operate like legal pyramid schemes.
Cultish: The Language of Fanaticism by Amanda Montell – Analyzes how cults (including MLMs) use language and manipulation techniques to maintain control over their members.
Duped: Compulsive Consumers and the Culture of Shame by Ron Jonson – While not MLM-specific, this book delves into how we’re manipulated by industries that exploit our insecurities.
Websites & Blogs:
Truth In Advertising (TINA.org) – A watchdog organization that exposes deceptive marketing practices, including MLM earnings claims and false advertising.
MLMTruth.org – A resource dedicated to educating the public on the dangers and tactics of MLMs, providing reports and analysis on popular companies.
The Anti-MLM Coalition – This coalition provides insight, resources, and stories from those who’ve escaped MLMs, along with analysis of companies and their harmful practices.
YouTube Channels:
The Anti-MLM Coalition – A YouTube channel that breaks down how MLMs operate, featuring stories from former MLM participants and experts in cult dynamics.
Savannah Marie – A former MLM participant who creates in-depth critiques and investigative videos on popular MLM schemes.
The Recovering Hunbot – Focuses on exposing the emotional manipulation and false promises made by MLM companies.
Hannah Alonzo-Hosts commentary-style videos relating to multi-level marketing companies, scams, cults, and influencer/social media culture.
Podcasts:
The Dream – A highly-rated podcast that dives deep into the world of MLMs, offering an in-depth investigation into the industry’s history and practices.
Life After MLM – Hosted by Roberta Blevins, this podcast features interviews with former MLM participants, exploring the mental and financial impacts of MLMs.
Opportunity Cost-Hosted by a past guest, Jill, and is about multi-level marketing, each episode she covers inner workings, origins, nuances, and tries to answer the question: Is this the opportunity of a lifetime? Or the illusion of one?
Conferences & Activist Groups:
The Anti-MLM Conference – A yearly event that gathers MLM critics, industry experts, and scholars to discuss deceptive practices in MLMs and their broader social impacts.
Multi-Level Marketing Conference (MLM Conference) – A scholarly conference that brings together academics, legal experts, and former MLM participants to discuss MLMs from a critical perspective.
Pyramid Scheme Alert – Run by Robert FitzPatrick, a pioneer in anti-MLM activism, this organization focuses on educating the public about the dangers of pyramid schemes and MLMs.
These resources provide a wide range of perspectives on commercial cults and MLMs, making them essential for those looking to understand and dismantle the harmful structures behind these organizations.
The late 19th and early 20th centuries were a time of profound change, a period when the boundaries between science, religion, and society were continually reshaped. This era saw the emergence of groundbreaking technological innovations, the rise of new belief systems, and the popularization of ideas that were once considered fringe. These developments didn’t just redefine technological progress—they also deeply influenced the way people understood the world and their place in it. Let’s explore some of the key transformations that marked this fascinating period.
🏭 An Era of Transformation
The Second Industrial Revolution: Shaping the Modern World
The Second Industrial Revolution, which spanned from the late 19th to the early 20th century, was a time of explosive growth and innovation. The advent of new technologies and processes fundamentally changed industries and daily life. Key advancements included:
Steel Production: The Bessemer process revolutionized steel production, making it faster and more cost-effective. This development laid the groundwork for the expansion of railways, the construction of skyscrapers, and the growth of cities.
Electric Power: The introduction of electric lighting and power systems transformed urban landscapes, extending work hours and improving the quality of life in cities. Innovations in electrical engineering also paved the way for the modern electronics industry.
Mechanized Production: The rise of large-scale factories and mechanized production processes changed the face of manufacturing. These innovations increased productivity and lowered costs, contributing to the mass production of goods and the rise of consumer culture.
The Second Great Awakening: A Religious Revival with Social Impact
Running parallel to technological advancements was the Second Great Awakening, a religious revival movement that swept across the United States in the early 19th century. This movement was characterized by fervent enthusiasm, emotional sermons, and mass conversions. Key aspects include:
Personal Salvation: Leaders like Charles Finney emphasized personal salvation and a direct, emotional connection with God. This focus on individual spirituality led to the growth of various Christian denominations and movements.
Social Reform: The revivalist spirit of the Second Great Awakening also fueled social reform movements, including abolitionism, temperance, and women’s rights. Religious fervor became a driving force behind efforts to reshape society according to Christian principles.
The Intersection of Science and Religion
The Birth of the Scientist: A New Approach to Understanding the World
The term “scientist” was first coined by philosopher William Whewell in 1833, marking a significant shift in how knowledge was pursued. This period saw the establishment of scientific societies and the professionalization of research, laying the foundation for modern science. Key developments included:
Systematic Inquiry: The emergence of the “scientist” as a distinct profession reflected a growing commitment to systematic, empirical methods for understanding the natural world. This approach contrasted with earlier, more philosophical or speculative methods of inquiry.
Scientific Societies: The formation of scientific societies provided a platform for the exchange of ideas and the dissemination of research. These organizations played a crucial role in advancing scientific knowledge and fostering collaboration among researchers.
Charles Darwin’s Evolutionary Theory: A Paradigm Shift
One of the most significant scientific developments of this era was the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species in 1859. Darwin’s theory of natural selection revolutionized biology and had profound implications for religion and society. Key points include:
Natural Selection: Darwin proposed that species evolve over time through a process of natural selection, where organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This theory challenged traditional creationist views and sparked intense debate.
Impact on Religion: Darwin’s work provoked significant controversy, particularly among religious communities. The idea that life could evolve without direct divine intervention challenged established religious doctrines and forced a reevaluation of the relationship between science and faith.
A Period of Dynamic Change
The late 19th and early 20th centuries were a time of dynamic change, where the interplay between technological progress, religious revival, and scientific discovery reshaped society in profound ways. The advancements and debates of this era laid the groundwork for many of the intellectual and cultural developments that continue to influence us today. As we reflect on this period, it’s clear that the convergence of science, religion, and society was not just a backdrop to history—it was a driving force that shaped the modern world.
Crisco and the Industrialization of Food: A Public Health Dilemma
David Wesson’s Innovations: Paving the Way for Processed Fats
Before Crisco became a household name, a critical innovation by chemist David Wesson set the stage for the transformation of cottonseed oil into a viable commercial product. Wesson developed industrial bleaching and deodorizing techniques that removed impurities and odors from cottonseed oil, making it suitable for consumption. These innovations turned what was once considered a waste byproduct of the cotton industry into a popular ingredient in processed foods.
The Transformation of Cottonseed Oil: Prior to Wesson’s advancements, cottonseed oil was largely discarded due to its unpleasant taste and smell. However, his techniques made it possible to produce a neutral-tasting oil, paving the way for its widespread use in cooking and food manufacturing. This not only provided a new revenue stream for the cotton industry but also introduced a new type of fat into the American diet.
Setting the Stage for Crisco: Wesson’s innovations in refining cottonseed oil directly influenced the creation of Crisco. In 1911, Procter & Gamble capitalized on this now-viable oil by using it as the base for their new product, Crisco, the first hydrogenated vegetable oil. Crisco was marketed as a cleaner, healthier alternative to traditional animal fats, further embedding processed fats into the American diet.
of nutrition.
The Flexner Report: Redefining Medical Education and Marginalizing Nutrition
The Medicalization of Health
In 1910, Abraham Flexner, an educator commissioned by the Carnegie Foundation, published a report that would fundamentally reshape medical education in the United States. The Flexner Report criticized the state of medical schools at the time, advocating for a more scientific and rigorous approach to medical training. While this led to significant improvements in the quality of medical education, it also had unintended consequences that continue to affect the healthcare system today.
Pharmaceutical Focus: One of the key outcomes of the Flexner Report was the shift towards a model of medical education that heavily emphasized pharmaceutical treatments and the biomedical approach to disease. This focus on treating symptoms with drugs often sidelined other aspects of health, such as nutrition, lifestyle, and preventive care.
Marginalization of Nutrition: As medical education became more specialized and disease-focused, the role of nutrition in maintaining health was increasingly neglected. The curriculum in medical schools began to prioritize pharmacology and surgery over dietary interventions and holistic approaches to health. This trend has persisted, contributing to a healthcare system that often overlooks the importance of nutrition in preventing and managing chronic diseases.
Lasting Impact: The legacy of the Flexner Report is still evident in today’s healthcare system, where physicians receive minimal training in nutrition and preventive care. This has led to a disconnect between the medical profession and the growing body of evidence supporting the role of diet and lifestyle in health. Patients often find that their doctors are more likely to prescribe medication than to offer dietary advice, perpetuating a cycle where symptoms are treated rather than underlying causes.
Rockefeller’s Indirect Role in Crisco’s Creation
One of Rockefeller’s lesser-known ventures was cottonseed oil. Standard Oil was involved in refining oil, and as the company expanded, it ventured into agricultural byproducts like cottonseed oil, which had ties to industrial processes similar to those used in petroleum refining. Rockefeller’s influence in the oil refining industry paved the way for technologies that would later be used in the food industry, such as hydrogenation. Hydrogenation is a process that was originally developed in the oil industry—primarily petroleum.
Crisco and the Industrialization of Food: A Public Health Dilemma
The Rise of Crisco: From Industry to Kitchen
Just a year after the publication of the Flexner Report, Procter & Gamble introduced Crisco, a revolutionary new product that would transform the American diet. Crisco was the first hydrogenated vegetable oil, created through a process that turned cottonseed oil—a byproduct of the cotton industry—into a solid, shelf-stable fat. Marketed as a cleaner, healthier alternative to animal fats like lard and butter, Crisco quickly became a staple in kitchens across the country.
Industrialization of Food: Crisco’s success marked a significant step in the industrialization of the food supply. It was one of the first mass-produced food products that relied on industrial processes to create something entirely new, rather than simply refining or preserving traditional foods. This innovation paved the way for the widespread use of processed foods, which today dominate the American diet.
The Introduction of Trans Fats: The hydrogenation process that created Crisco also produced trans fats, which were largely unknown to the public at the time. For decades, trans fats were used extensively in processed foods due to their stability and low cost. However, research eventually revealed that trans fats are highly detrimental to health, significantly increasing the risk of heart disease, stroke, and other chronic conditions.
Public Health Consequences: The widespread adoption of Crisco and other hydrogenated oils contributed to a dramatic shift in the American diet, away from natural fats and towards processed, industrially produced fats. This shift has been linked to the rise in obesity, cardiovascular disease, and other diet-related health issues that continue to plague the population today.
The intersection of industry, medicine, and nutrition in the early 20th century had profound and lasting impacts on public health. Two significant events—the publication of the Flexner Report in 1910 and the introduction of Crisco in 1911—played pivotal roles in shaping the way we approach food, health, and medicine. These influences continue to resonate in modern healthcare and nutrition science, often to the detriment of public health. Let’s explore how these developments unfolded and the lasting effects they’ve had on our understanding of nutrition.
The Impact of Historical Influences on Nutrition: How the Flexner Report and Crisco Reshaped Public Health
The intersection of industry, medicine, and nutrition in the early 20th century had profound and lasting impacts on public health. Two significant events—the publication of the Flexner Report in 1910 and the introduction of Crisco in 1911—played pivotal roles in shaping the way we approach food, health, and medicine. These influences continue to resonate in modern healthcare and nutrition science, often to the detriment of public health.
The Influence of Religious Movements on Nutrition
Seventh-Day Adventism and Nutritional Reform
The Seventh-Day Adventist Church, founded in the mid-19th century, had a profound impact on American dietary practices. Ellen G. White, a key figure in the church, advocated for dietary restrictions based on her religious beliefs. Her recommendations included vegetarianism, the avoidance of stimulants like caffeine and alcohol, and a focus on holistic health. These recommendations were driven by religious beliefs rather than scientific evidence, leading to misleading dietary practices and a restrictive diet culture rather than genuinely beneficial health habits.
Her health reforms, which emphasized vegetarianism and whole foods, were institutionalized through health institutions like the Battle Creek Sanitarium and figures like Dr. John Harvey Kellogg. The sanitarium’s success and the dissemination of these dietary principles led to the establishment of the American Dietetic Association in 1917, which originally promoted many of these plant-based, whole-food principles. The Adventist emphasis on preventive health care and diet principles laid the groundwork for many modern dietary guidelines and continue to influence discussions around veganism.
Sylvester Graham and the Health Food Movement: A Critical Perspective
Sylvester Graham, a key figure in early American health reform, is often remembered for his influence on the health food movement and the creation of the Graham cracker. However, his dietary principles were deeply intertwined with his moral and religious views, particularly his beliefs about suppressing sexual urges.
The Man Behind the Movement
Sylvester Graham (1794–1851) was a Presbyterian minister whose health reform efforts were driven by more than just a desire for better nutrition. His dietary recommendations were rooted in his belief that physical health was closely linked to moral and spiritual purity. Graham’s ideas were based on the notion that a simpler diet, free from stimulants like caffeine and alcohol, would not only improve physical health but also help suppress sexual desires, which he and his contemporaries saw as a moral failing.
Dietary Principles and Moral Agenda
Graham’s health principles included:
Vegetarianism: He promoted a diet free from meat, believing it would enhance both physical health and moral restraint.
Avoidance of Stimulants: He advised against consuming caffeine and alcohol, which he associated with negative moral and physical effects.
Simplicity and Moderation: His diet emphasized plain, unprocessed foods and self-restraint.
Graham’s dietary reforms were part of a broader attempt to control what he saw as unhealthy and immoral behavior. He believed that a disciplined diet would help curb sexual urges, which he viewed as a major threat to individual and societal purity.
The Graham Cracker: A Tool for Reform
The Graham cracker, a product of Graham’s dietary reform, was created with the intention of supporting digestive health and satisfying cravings in a morally acceptable way. While it has become a popular snack, its creation was driven by Graham’s broader health and moral agenda. The cracker was designed to be a healthful alternative to more stimulating and indulgent foods.
Graham’s dietary principles were part of a larger movement that sought to reform not just food habits but also moral behavior. His ideas reflected a concern with maintaining moral purity through dietary control, a concept that influenced various health reform efforts of the time. However, it’s important to recognize that many of Graham’s claims were not based on rigorous scientific evidence but rather on his own beliefs and the prevailing moral attitudes of his era.
While Graham’s advocacy for dietary reform contributed to the development of health foods and the broader health movement, his ideas were also deeply entwined with his attempts to control sexual behavior. This connection reflects a historical context where dietary practices were often used as a means of enforcing moral and social norms.
The Graham cracker, though still a common snack, serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between health reform and moral ideologies. Today, it’s essential to approach such historical figures with a critical understanding of how their personal beliefs influenced their recommendations.
Sylvester Graham’s impact on the health food movement was significant, but it was also rooted in a broader moral agenda that sought to suppress sexual urges through dietary control. While his ideas helped shape dietary practices and health food development, they were not always grounded in scientific evidence. By understanding the historical context of Graham’s work, we can better appreciate the evolution of dietary reform and the need for evidence-based approaches to health.
Learning from History: Integrating Nutrition into Modern Health Practices
The historical narratives of the Flexner Report, Crisco, and influential dietary movements like Seventh-Day Adventism reveal the intricate connections between industry, religion, and health. The Flexner Report’s emphasis on pharmaceuticals and Crisco’s promotion of processed fats underscores significant shifts in health practices that have had lasting impacts on public health.
A Shift in Priorities: The Flexner Report’s focus on pharmaceuticals often came at the expense of a more holistic understanding of health, one that includes nutrition and lifestyle as key components. Similarly, the industrialization of food, exemplified by Crisco, introduced dietary patterns that are now recognized as harmful.
Learning from History: As we continue to navigate challenges in nutrition and healthcare, it’s crucial to reintegrate a holistic approach to health that includes both nutrition and preventive care. Recognizing the historical impacts of these developments helps us advocate for a healthcare system that values comprehensive care and a food industry that prioritizes public health over profit.
Reclaiming Health Through Nutrition
Ellen G. White’s health reforms, emphasizing vegetarianism and whole foods, were institutionalized by the Battle Creek Sanitarium and figures like Dr. John Harvey Kellogg. This led to the 1917 founding of the American Dietetic Association, initially promoting these principles. Meanwhile, the Flexner Report and Crisco’s introduction highlight historical forces shaping health and nutrition. These events underscore the need for a holistic health approach that integrates nutrition and addresses industrialization’s impacts. Moving forward, it’s crucial to advocate for a healthcare system focused on preventive care and a food industry that prioritizes public health.
As we wrap up our exploration of conspiracy chronicles this week, we’ve uncovered how the 20th century marked a pivotal shift in the rise of political paranoia and corporate influence. Powerful corporations, fueled by rapid technological and social changes during the Second Industrial Revolution, began to wield unprecedented control. From the Fletcher Report to the invention of Crisco and Ancel Keys’ flawed dietary research, lobbying and payoffs set the stage for policies that still impact public health today.
In fact, a 2020 study revealed that 95% of members on the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee have conflicts of interest with industry giants like Kellogg, General Mills, Kraft, and Dannon. These ties, whether through research funding or board memberships, call into question the impartiality of public health recommendations. With corporate agendas deeply embedded in sectors like food and pharmaceuticals, the guidelines shaping what we eat are under scrutiny, reminding us that the influence of these forces remains a pressing issue. Read more here.
📚 Further Reading
Dive deeper into these captivating topics with these resources:
Explore these intriguing developments and see how they continue to shape our understanding of health, religion, and science today. 🌟
If you’re looking to explore the topic of conflicts of interest in the U.S. food system, including the influence of corporate lobbying on dietary guidelines and public health, here are some credible resources:
Marion Nestle’s Work Marion Nestle, a renowned nutritionist and public health advocate, has extensively written about the politics of food and how corporate interests shape food policies. Her book “Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health” is a foundational resource that explores conflicts of interest in detail. She has also published several articles and blog posts that can be found on her website, Food Politics.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) CSPI is a non-profit organization that advocates for public health and transparency in the food industry. They regularly publish reports and articles on how industry lobbyists influence dietary guidelines and public health policies. Visit their site for comprehensive resources: CSPI.
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) JAMA has published several peer-reviewed articles on the conflicts of interest within the committees that develop dietary guidelines. You can access these studies through JAMA.
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) UCS focuses on the intersection of science, policy, and industry influence, and they have published reports on the food industry’s role in shaping guidelines. You can find their reports here: UCS Food System Work.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Health Freedom Platform RFK Jr.’s organization, Children’s Health Defense, provides reports and articles on corporate influence in healthcare and the food system. While this source may reflect RFK Jr.’s specific views, it offers insights into his arguments and data regarding industry control. Children’s Health Defense.
Are you ready to unravel the layers of reality, challenge the narratives we’ve been fed, and embrace the journey toward deeper understanding? Welcome to this week’s episode of Taste of Truth Tuesdays, where curiosity is your compass and skepticism your guide. Our wonderful guest, Carie Moore, dives into the profound wisdom of St. Francis of Assisi, exploring how his teachings not only resonate with modern challenges but also empower us to live with intention, compassion, and an unyielding quest for truth.
Buckle up, because we’re about to explore a spiritual path that’s as relevant today as it was centuries ago.
In a world filled with complexity and challenges, finding a spiritual path that resonates with both ancient wisdom and modern realities can be a profound journey. The teachings of St. Francis of Assisi offer a unique perspective that blends a deep reverence for nature with a compassionate approach to faith, making Franciscan principles a valuable guide for our spiritual growth today. Let’s explore how these timeless ideas can address some of the pressing issues we face and enrich our spiritual lives.
Scripture as a Living Guide
Franciscan theology views scripture not merely as a static set of rules but as a dynamic, living guide that evolves with our understanding and experiences. This perspective encourages a more flexible and personal approach to faith, where scripture becomes a tool for reflection and growth rather than a rigid doctrine. By seeing scripture as alive, Franciscan wisdom invites us to continually engage with it, allowing its teachings to shape our journey in a way that is relevant to our current challenges and questions.
Nature as a Reflection of God’s Beauty
St. Francis is renowned for his deep connection to nature, seeing all of creation as a reflection of God’s beauty. This reverence for the natural world resonates strongly in today’s context, where environmental concerns and the pursuit of sustainable living are increasingly important. Gardening, growing our own food, and nurturing our health can be seen as spiritual practices in the Franciscan tradition, ways of honoring the divine in the everyday world around us. By cultivating a mindful relationship with nature, we align ourselves with the Franciscan view of creation as a sacred gift.
Embracing Original Goodness
In mainstream Western Christianity, the doctrine of Original Sin is a cornerstone of theological understanding. This belief, rooted in the Genesis account of Adam and Eve’s disobedience in the Garden of Eden, posits that humanity inherited a fallen, sinful nature as a result of this first transgression. According to this view, Original Sin not only taints every human being but also separates them from God. This inherent flaw necessitates redemption and salvation through Jesus Christ, emphasizing a view of human nature that is fundamentally flawed and in need of divine intervention for reconciliation with God.
This perspective on Original Sin often frames human beings as inherently imperfect and prone to moral failings, which can create a backdrop of guilt and shame. It underscores the need for a savior and reinforces a narrative of human inadequacy that is to be addressed through faith, repentance, and adherence to divine commands.
In contrast, Franciscan theology offers a refreshing and radically different perspective. St. Francis of Assisi and his followers emphasize the concept of Original Goodness rather than Original Sin. This approach reinterprets the story of humanity’s beginnings not as a tale of inherent sinfulness but as one that highlights the fundamental goodness with which humanity was created. According to Franciscan thought, while humanity has the capacity for error, it is fundamentally good and created in the image of God. This view shifts the focus from a narrative of inherent guilt and sinfulness to one of intrinsic worth and potential.
By embracing the idea of Original Goodness, Franciscan theology challenges us to view ourselves and others through a lens of inherent dignity and potential rather than judgment and condemnation. This perspective fosters a more compassionate and hopeful outlook on human nature. It encourages us to see beyond our flaws and recognize the divine spark within ourselves and others, promoting a mindset of acceptance and love rather than guilt and shame.
In a world often dominated by negativity, judgment, and the harshness of modern life, adopting the Franciscan view of Original Goodness can be profoundly liberating. It allows for deeper self-acceptance and a more loving approach to our interactions with others. By acknowledging the fundamental goodness in every person, we can cultivate a more nurturing and supportive environment, both within ourselves and in our relationships.
Thus, while mainstream Christianity’s focus on Original Sin highlights human imperfection and the need for redemption, Franciscan theology invites us to celebrate the inherent goodness in each person, leading to a more compassionate and hopeful approach to life and faith.
The Incarnation as a Divine Choice
The Incarnation: A Tale of Two Theologies
The Incarnation—the belief that God became human in the person of Jesus Christ—is a central doctrine in Christianity, but its interpretation can vary significantly between mainstream Western Christianity and Franciscan theology. Understanding these differences can offer profound insights into how we relate to God and perceive our own sense of purpose.
Mainstream Western Christianity: The Response to Sin
In mainstream Western Christianity, particularly within traditions influenced by Augustine and later theological developments, the Incarnation is often framed primarily as a response to the problem of sin. According to this view, God became human because humanity’s original sin created a chasm between God and creation. The divine act of becoming incarnate is seen as a necessary step to address and rectify this separation.
Here, the focus tends to be on Jesus’s role as the savior who redeems humanity from the consequences of sin and reconciles them with God. The Incarnation is thus viewed through the lens of necessity and redemption—a divine remedy to the human flaw of Original Sin. This perspective underscores the idea that the primary purpose of Christ’s coming was to offer salvation and atonement, highlighting human sinfulness and the need for divine intervention.
Franciscan Theology: A Choice of Love and Closeness
In contrast, Franciscan theology offers a more nuanced and profoundly relational interpretation of the Incarnation. According to Franciscan thought, the Incarnation was not merely a response to sin but a free and loving choice by God. This perspective emphasizes that God’s decision to become human was motivated by a deep desire to be intimately close to humanity, rather than solely to address the problem of sin.
St. Francis of Assisi and his followers believed that God’s incarnation represented an expression of divine love and a way to embrace the human experience fully. In this view, the Incarnation is seen as a gift of presence, revealing God’s profound love and willingness to share in human suffering, joy, and daily life. It is an act of divine solidarity that highlights the inherent worth and dignity of human life.
Implications for Our Relationship with God and Sense of Purpose
Understanding the Incarnation through the Franciscan lens can have significant implications for our personal relationship with God and our sense of purpose:
A Loving Relationship: Viewing the Incarnation as an expression of God’s love rather than a mere solution to sin fosters a relationship with God that is centered on intimacy and mutual connection. It emphasizes that God’s presence in our lives is rooted in love and closeness, rather than just as a response to our shortcomings. This understanding can make our relationship with God feel more personal and nurturing, focusing on divine companionship rather than just divine intervention.
Embracing Human Experience: Recognizing that God chose to become human and share in our experiences encourages us to embrace our own lives with a sense of purpose and dignity. It suggests that our daily experiences, struggles, and joys are deeply valued by God. This perspective can inspire us to live more fully and authentically, knowing that our human lives are part of a divine narrative of love and connection.
Redefining Redemption: While redemption remains a crucial aspect of Christian faith, understanding it through the lens of God’s loving choice rather than solely as a response to sin can shift the focus from guilt and atonement to a broader view of spiritual growth and transformation. It invites us to see redemption as an ongoing process of deepening our relationship with God and living out the love and presence that the Incarnation signifies.
Purposeful Living: Finally, this understanding of the Incarnation encourages us to find purpose in embodying the love and closeness that God demonstrated through becoming human. It inspires us to act with compassion, to engage with others in meaningful ways, and to approach life with a sense of divine purpose and connection.
By reflecting on the Franciscan view of the Incarnation, we gain a richer appreciation of God’s relationship with humanity and how that relationship can shape our own lives. It reminds us that our faith is not just about addressing sin but about embracing a profound and loving connection with the divine.
Walking in Christ’s Footsteps
Walking in the Footsteps of Christ: Franciscan Spirituality vs. Mainstream Christianity
In the heart of Franciscan spirituality lies a profound call to embody the teachings and life of Jesus Christ. St. Francis of Assisi’s invitation to “walk in the footsteps of Christ” is not just about personal piety or theological correctness; it’s about a holistic approach to living out one’s faith in every aspect of life. This call for transformative living extends beyond personal spiritual growth to include how we engage with and impact the world around us.
Franciscan Spirituality: Embodying Love and Compassion
For St. Francis and his followers, walking in Christ’s footsteps means living a life marked by radical love, compassion, and humility. This journey is deeply intertwined with how one interacts with others and the world:
Acts of Service: Central to Franciscan spirituality is the practice of serving others selflessly. This involves reaching out to those in need, whether through direct acts of charity, social justice efforts, or simply offering a listening ear and a helping hand. By prioritizing service, Franciscans aim to mirror the compassion of Christ, who served and cared for the marginalized and downtrodden.
Care for the Environment: St. Francis is famously known for his deep connection to nature, seeing all of creation as a reflection of God’s beauty. Walking in Christ’s footsteps, from a Franciscan perspective, involves stewardship of the environment. This includes advocating for sustainable practices, respecting the natural world, and recognizing the interconnectedness of all life. The care for creation reflects a commitment to honoring the divine gift of the world.
Being Present with Others: Franciscan spirituality emphasizes being fully present with others, practicing active listening, and fostering genuine relationships. This presence is an expression of love and respect, reflecting the way Christ engaged with people during his ministry. By valuing and investing in personal relationships, Franciscans strive to embody the love and empathy exemplified by Christ.
Mainstream Christianity: Focus on Belief and Salvation
In contrast, mainstream Western Christianity often places significant emphasis on doctrinal correctness and salvation. This focus manifests in various ways:
Protecting from Hell: A central concern in mainstream Christianity is ensuring that individuals are saved from eternal damnation. This focus often leads to a preoccupation with adherence to specific beliefs, confessions, and rituals designed to secure one’s place in heaven. The emphasis is on right belief and confession as the primary means of salvation.
Belief and Confession: Theological correctness and confession of faith can become central to the Christian experience, sometimes overshadowing the practical aspects of living out one’s faith. There is a strong emphasis on believing the right things and making the correct confessions, which can lead to a focus on doctrinal purity rather than living out the teachings of Christ in daily life.
Carie Moore’s Insight: The Living Faith vs. Theoretical Faith
Carie Moore’s observation highlights a critical distinction between these approaches. While mainstream Christianity often focuses on ensuring that people hold the correct beliefs and are protected from hell, Franciscan spirituality challenges believers to focus on living like Christ. This living faith involves:
Authentic Application: Instead of merely adhering to doctrinal statements, Franciscan spirituality calls for the practical application of Christ’s teachings. This means living a life of love, humility, and service, embodying Christ’s example in tangible ways.
Transformational Living: Franciscan spirituality emphasizes that the true measure of faith is not just in correct beliefs but in how those beliefs translate into actions. It’s about personal transformation that leads to meaningful engagement with the world and others.
Holistic Faith: The Franciscan approach integrates spiritual beliefs with everyday actions, suggesting that a genuine walk with Christ involves living out one’s faith in all aspects of life—through service, environmental care, and compassionate presence.
Conclusion
In summary, while mainstream Christianity often emphasizes correct belief and salvation as its primary focus, Franciscan spirituality invites a broader and more integrated approach to faith. Walking in the footsteps of Christ, according to Franciscan teachings, is about embodying love, compassion, and humility in every action and interaction. Carie Moore’s insight points to a profound shift from a focus on theoretical correctness to a lived experience of faith, encouraging a holistic and impactful approach to embodying the teachings of Christ in our daily lives.
How does this call shape your spiritual journey and your interactions with the world?
The wisdom of St. Francis offers a rich and nuanced approach to spirituality that is deeply relevant to the challenges we face today. By embracing Franciscan principles, we can find new ways to grow spiritually, nurture our connection to nature, and engage with our faith in a dynamic and meaningful way. As you reflect on these questions, consider how Franciscan wisdom might illuminate your own spiritual path and inspire you to live with greater purpose and compassion.
To dive deeper into Franciscan spirituality, a variety of resources can provide valuable insights into the teachings and practices associated with St. Francis of Assisi and his followers. Here are some highly regarded books, articles, and online resources to help you explore Franciscan spirituality:
Books
“The Little Flowers of St. Francis” by St. Francis of Assisi
This classic work offers a collection of stories about the life and teachings of St. Francis, providing a glimpse into his spiritual practices and his approach to living a Christ-like life.
“Francis of Assisi: A Revolutionary Life” by Adrian House
A comprehensive biography that explores the life of St. Francis, his spiritual journey, and the impact of his teachings.
“St. Francis and the Foolishness of God” by Richard Rohr
Richard Rohr, a contemporary Franciscan friar, provides a modern interpretation of St. Francis’s spirituality and its relevance to today’s world.
“The Franciscan Journey: A Guide to Franciscan Spirituality” by Thomas of Celano
This book offers insights into Franciscan spiritual practices and the historical context of St. Francis’s life.
“Daily Devotions with St. Francis of Assisi” by Susan Helen Wallace
A practical guide for integrating Franciscan spirituality into daily life through devotions and reflections.
Articles and Journals
“Franciscan Spirituality and Its Influence” by William Short
An article exploring the historical development and impact of Franciscan spirituality within the Christian tradition.
“The Spirituality of St. Francis of Assisi” by Richard Rohr
An article by Richard Rohr that delves into the key elements of Franciscan spirituality and how they can be applied to contemporary life.
“Franciscan Spirituality: A Historical and Theological Overview” in the Journal of Franciscan Studies
Academic articles providing scholarly analysis of Franciscan spirituality and its theological implications.
A website dedicated to sharing information about Franciscan spirituality, including articles, podcasts, and resources related to St. Francis and his teachings.
The official website of the Franciscan Order provides resources on Franciscan spirituality, history, and contemporary practices.
Richard Rohr’s Center for Action and Contemplation (cac.org)
Richard Rohr’s organization offers various resources, including articles, podcasts, and online courses on Franciscan spirituality and contemplative practices.
Many parish websites include resources on Franciscan spirituality, including spiritual reflections, teachings, and community activities.
Franciscan Spirituality on YouTube
Search for video resources and talks on Franciscan spirituality. Channels such as Franciscan Friars of the Renewal often provide videos on St. Francis and Franciscan practices.
These resources will help you gain a comprehensive understanding of Franciscan spirituality, its historical context, and its application to modern life.
Nostalgia has always been a powerful psychological force, often serving as a coping mechanism during times of uncertainty or rapid change. In recent years, its resurgence could be linked to various social and cultural factors, including economic instability, political polarization, and the overwhelming pace of technological advancements. However, nostalgia isn’t just about reminiscing; it’s a complex emotional response that plays a significant role in our psychological well-being.
The Psychology of Nostalgia: Comfort in Uncertainty
Nostalgia was once viewed as a negative emotion, associated with homesickness or a longing for the past. However, modern psychology recognizes it as a complex, bittersweet experience that can foster a sense of continuity, meaning, and identity. Nostalgia tends to emerge more during periods of transition or distress, offering comfort by reconnecting individuals with a perceived “better” or simpler time.
Nostalgia serves as a mental protective mechanism. Through a process known as “rose-colored retrospection,” people tend to recall the past in a more favorable light than it might have actually been. This selective memory process can result in an idealized version of the “good ol’ days,” where negative aspects are minimized or forgotten, and positive experiences are amplified.
Nostalgia as a Tool for Emotional Regulation
Interestingly, nostalgia isn’t just a passive experience; it can be consciously invoked to regulate emotions. When people deliberately recall positive memories, they can stabilize their mood, reduce anxiety, and increase a sense of control over their current situation. This is because the past, as we remember it, is fixed and unchangeable, offering a sense of predictability and safety that contrasts with the unpredictability of the future.
Nostalgia also acts as a psychological anchor during times of upheaval or change. By tapping into nostalgic memories, individuals can create a mental environment that feels familiar and safe, reducing the anxiety that comes from unpredictability. This sense of predictability is particularly comforting during periods of rapid change, as it provides a mental sanctuary in a chaotic world.
The Trad Wife Movement: Nostalgia as Identity Anchoring
The rise of the Trad wife movement—a trend where women embrace traditional gender roles and domesticity—can be understood as a form of nostalgia-driven identity anchoring. In a world that often feels chaotic and uncertain, many women (and men) find comfort in returning to what they perceive as a more stable, moral, and ordered past.
For some, adopting the Trad wife lifestyle is a way to reconnect with what they believe to be a more “authentic” version of femininity or womanhood. This version is often based on an idealized image of the past that emphasizes domestic skills, submissiveness, and clear gender roles. By embracing these ideals, individuals may feel that they are preserving a core part of their identity that they believe has been lost or undermined by modern society.
The Dangers of Nostalgia-Driven Resistance
While nostalgia can provide comfort and continuity, it can also serve as a form of resistance against social progress. The Trad wife movement often emerges in response to the perceived erosion of traditional values due to feminism, LGBTQ+ rights, and other social changes. In this context, nostalgia becomes a way to resist or reject modernity by clinging to a past that is seen as morally superior or more “natural.”
This selective use of nostalgia can reinforce regressive social norms and create tension between those who long for the past and those who advocate for continued social change. By idealizing a past that may never have truly existed as we remember it, the Trad wife movement and similar trends risk promoting an illusion that can hinder progress and inclusivity.
Conclusion: Navigating Nostalgia with Awareness
Nostalgia is far more than mere longing for the past. It’s a sophisticated psychological tool that individuals can harness to enhance their well-being, regulate their emotions, and maintain a sense of control. However, it’s important to approach nostalgia with a critical eye, recognizing that the past may not have been as perfect as we remember it.
The Trad wife movement, driven by nostalgia, may offer comfort in a rapidly changing world, but it also risks perpetuating outdated and harmful gender roles. By understanding the psychology behind nostalgia, we can better navigate its influence in our lives and make more informed choices about how we engage with the past—and the future.
Want to learn more about the complex interplay between nostalgia and modern social movements like the Trad wife trend? Tune into this week’s episode of Taste of Truth Tuesdays where we dive deep into this topic. https://youtu.be/15kgRldlqoY?si=L_uToPjGIQTf_kIl
In recent years, social media has revolutionized the way individuals and organizations promote their values and products. For the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), commonly known as the Mormon Church, this digital age presents both opportunities and challenges. Mormon influencers leverage their social media platforms not only to promote their faith but also to engage in network marketing and endorse various products. This post explores how these influencers operate, the intersection of faith and commerce, and the ethical implications of their strategies.
The Rise of Mormon Influencers
Mormon influencers utilize their platforms to promote a range of products, often integrating their religious values into their marketing strategies. Here’s how they do it:
1. Selling Products
Network Marketing: Influencers often participate in network marketing companies like Young Living, doTERRA, and Monat. These companies thrive on personal networks for sales and recruitment, which aligns with the close-knit nature of the Mormon community.
Brand Partnerships: Many influencers collaborate with brands to promote products such as health supplements, fashion items, and home goods. Their content typically reflects a wholesome, family-oriented lifestyle that resonates with their followers.
Homemade and Handcrafted Goods: Some influencers sell their own creations, such as crafts, clothing, or digital products. Their personal brand often emphasizes values like family, self-reliance, and creativity.
2. Recruiting into Their Religion
Personal Testimonies: Sharing personal faith stories is a common tactic. Influencers discuss how their beliefs positively affect their lives, making their faith appealing to potential followers.
Showcasing Lifestyle: By highlighting a family-centric and clean-living lifestyle, influencers subtly promote the benefits of their faith. This can attract those seeking community and moral guidance.
Incorporating Faith into Content: Faith is often woven into daily content, making religious practices and values a natural part of the influencer’s brand.
Service and Community Involvement: Influencers highlight their community service projects, showcasing the active and supportive nature of the Mormon community.
Network Marketing and the LDS Church
Amway and the LDS Church
The blog post “Amway and the Mormon Church” explores the historical connections between Amway, a prominent network marketing company, and the LDS Church. Many Mormons have been involved in Amway’s business model, which relies on personal networks for sales and recruitment. The Mormon community’s strong emphasis on personal relationships and trust makes it a fertile ground for such network marketing ventures.
Key Points from the Article:
Historical Connections: The LDS Church has had historical ties with network marketing companies like Amway, with many members participating in their business models.
Community and Trust: The close-knit nature of the Mormon community fosters an environment where network marketing can thrive, as trust and personal connections play a significant role in sales and recruitment.
Melaleuca and its Relationship with LDS Influencers
Melaleuca, Inc., a wellness product company based in Idaho, was founded by Frank L. VanderSloot, an LDS Church member. While Melaleuca is not officially affiliated with the LDS Church, its founder’s faith influences its business practices and marketing strategies.
Melaleuca’s Key Points:
Product Marketing: Distributors often promote Melaleuca’s products within their personal and community networks, including religious communities.
Health Claims: Some distributors may make exaggerated health claims about Melaleuca’s products, which can veer into sensationalism and conspiracy theories about conventional medicine.
The Trad Wife Controversy and Traditional Values
In the ongoing conversation about traditional values and gender roles, the Ballerina Farm controversy provides a significant example of how these ideals are presented and critiqued. Ballerina Farm, a popular social media presence, showcases a vision of traditional domestic life that aligns with the “trad wife” movement. This movement emphasizes traditional roles and domestic fulfillment, which some individuals see as empowering personal choices.
Houseinhabit’s Perspective: Houseinhabit’s analysis of Ballerina Farm shared her perspective on this issue. According to Houseinhabit, “Hannah’s story isn’t about regression; it’s about choice. She embodies a version of success not measured by corporate titles but by personal contentment and family harmony that is, at the core, rooted in her faith in God. Ultimately, the real goal of feminism should recognize and respect the diverse paths women take. Critique should foster understanding rather than perpetuating division.” Houseinhabit argues that Ballerina Farm presents traditional roles as voluntary and desirable, rather than acknowledging their roots in patriarchal structures.
Patriarchal Norms and Cultural Context: This perspective is important, but it’s also crucial to consider the role of patriarchal norms within such movements. Consequently, practices that may seem problematic to outsiders—such as Daniel’s rushed engagement and his control over Hannah’s education—are often normalized within their cultural context. These actions reflect a broader adherence to patriarchal values, including homeschooling with a Christian Mormon syllabus, which underscores their commitment to traditional gender roles.
The LDS Church’s Use of Social Media Influencers
Adding another layer to this discussion, recent research into Mormon influencers reveals how the LDS Church is using social media to attract new recruits. Influencers, particularly families, are employed to promote Mormonism through platforms like Instagram and YouTube. This strategy capitalizes on the appeal of traditional family values and domestic harmony to attract a broader audience. The church’s use of social media influencers can be seen as a recruitment tool that highlights the appealing aspects of traditional lifestyles while potentially overshadowing the complexities and criticisms associated with these roles.
Ethical Considerations and Transparency
The use of social media for religious and commercial purposes raises several ethical questions:
Commercial vs. Faith Promotion: Influencers must navigate the fine line between promoting their faith and commercial interests. Transparency about religious intentions behind promotions is crucial.
Sensationalism and Conspiracy Theories: Some network marketing practices, particularly in the wellness sector, involve sensationalizing health benefits or promoting anti-mainstream narratives. This can lead to misinformation and mislead consumers.
Regulatory Concerns: Companies like Melaleuca are subject to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations that aim to prevent deceptive marketing practices. Ensuring compliance and transparency is essential to maintaining consumer trust.
Conclusion
The intersection of social media, faith, and network marketing presents both opportunities and challenges for LDS influencers. While they effectively use their platforms to promote products and their faith, ethical considerations about transparency, sensationalism, and the blending of commercial and religious messages remain significant. The Ballerina Farm controversy and the LDS Church’s social media strategies illustrate a broader societal pattern where traditional values and modern media intersect, raising important questions about how these dynamics influence perceptions of gender roles and faith.
Books and Articles
“Mormonism and the Politics of Gender: Gender, Family, and Identity” by Anne C. Lovell
Explores the role of gender within Mormon culture and how it impacts family and identity dynamics.
“How the LDS Church Uses Social Media to Grow Its Congregation” – A detailed article discussing the strategies employed by the LDS Church to use social media for growth.
These resources should provide a solid foundation for understanding the LDS Church’s use of social media influencers and the broader implications for religious outreach and media influence.
This week, I’m diving headfirst into the turbulent intersection of women’s suffrage, the resurgence of Christian patriarchy, and the trendy ‘trad wife’ movement. Buckle up as we unravel how these historical battles and modern movements collide, revealing their surprising connections—from the ongoing struggle for gender equality to the modern reinvention of traditional roles. Prepare for a journey through past and present that challenges conventional wisdom and ignites critical conversations.
🎧Listen here!
My Deconstruction Journey
In recent months, I’ve explored how radicalization, conspiracies, and religion have shaped my life. In Episode 5 of my podcast, we tackled the “crunchy hippie to alt-right pipeline,” but now it’s time to shine a light on the radicalization of the left—a topic often overlooked. Why did I go from progressive circles to mingling with Trump supporters and Christians? This shift was marked by a range of events and trends reflecting broader changes within progressive movements and their impact on American politics and culture.
Black Lives Matter Protests and Social Justice Movements
The murder of George Floyd ignited the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, but what often goes undiscussed is the scrutiny BLM faced over fund management. Allegations of financial mismanagement emerged in 2021, raising questions about how substantial donations were handled. The movement also brought the call to “defund the police” into the spotlight, advocating for reallocating funds to social services and community programs. However, cities like San Francisco, which initially reduced police funding, faced rising crime rates and eventually reinstated funding in 2022, acknowledging that some defunding measures had not achieved their intended outcomes.
Increased Political Activism and the Role of Cancel Culture
The 2020s saw a rise in intersectionality and identity politics, aiming to address overlapping forms of oppression. However, this sometimes led to contentious debates over ideological purity and inclusivity, particularly in online activism. Cancel culture became prominent, with debates over holding public figures accountable for perceived offenses. While some view it as necessary for social justice, others argue it suppresses free speech and stifles constructive dialogue.
Vaccine Hesitancy and the Crunchy-to-Patriarchy Pipeline
My reluctance to receive an experimental vaccine led to severe ostracism, as those hesitant about COVID-19 vaccines often faced dehumanization and cancel culture. This harsh treatment highlighted how cancel culture can suppress nuanced debate and alienate individuals with genuine concerns.
Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a prominent figure in vaccinology, and some of his colleagues recently published an article that has drawn significant attention. The article acknowledges that vaccines are not as thoroughly studied as previously claimed, particularly in terms of safety, both before and after they are licensed. This has raised concerns among critics, who argue that for decades, the public was assured that vaccines underwent rigorous safety testing.
Key points from the article include the admission that prelicensure clinical trials often have limited sample sizes and short follow-up periods, which may not fully capture long-term safety data. Additionally, there are currently no dedicated resources for post-authorization safety studies, relying instead on annual appropriations approved by Congress. This lack of resources for ongoing safety monitoring has been criticized as inadequate, particularly given the widespread use of vaccines.
This revelation has been met with strong reactions, especially from those who have long questioned the rigor of vaccine safety studies. They argue that these acknowledgments confirm their concerns that vaccine safety has not been as thoroughly investigated as it should be.
In a previous episode, we scratched the surface of the Trad Wife and Stay-at-Home Girlfriend Movements. These movements, advocating traditional gender roles, see them as spiritually fulfilling and empowering, rejecting modern feminism while embracing modern cultural influences. We discussed the fear tactics within this online content that manipulates users by promoting apocalyptic scenarios and moral decay. Today, we’re diving deeper into this topic.
Historical Context and Kitchen Design
Before delving into the 19th Amendment, let’s explore the evolution of kitchen design as a reflection of changing gender roles and societal expectations:
Post-Civil War to Early 20th Century (1865-1930s): Kitchens transitioned from being managed by enslaved people to paid workers, with labor-saving appliances emerging and the housewife ideal taking shape.
Mid-20th Century (1930s-1960s): The post-WWII era emphasized suburban living and reinforced the housewife’s role as a symbol of the American dream, driven by economic prosperity and suburban expansion.
1974 Bill on Women’s Financial Independence: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act granted women the right to open bank accounts and obtain credit cards in their names, a significant step towards financial equality.
Today’s ‘trad wife’ movement glamorizes the mid-century housewife as a personal choice, not a patriarchal trap. But let’s be real—this nostalgic comeback is less about empowerment and more about rolling back feminist progress, cherry-picking conservative values to fit a romanticized narrative. It’s time to call out the toxicity and acknowledge that the nuclear family ideal doesn’t have to be a patriarchal prison.
Connecting Women’s Suffrage and Christian Nationalism
This week marks the anniversary of the 19th Amendment, a milestone for women’s rights. However, despite granting voting rights, many women of color continued to face disenfranchisement. The rise of ideologies challenging this progress, such as Nancy Pearcey’s claim that women’s suffrage was a net loss, reflects a broader trend of dominionism and Christian nationalism. Pearcey’s book, The Toxic War on Masculinity, embraced by right-wing fundamentalist figures, has been criticized for its logical fallacies and misrepresentation of research.
A Critique of Nancy Pearcey’s The Toxic War on Masculinity
Pearcey argues that the expansion of women’s roles and rights has led to a “war on masculinity,” promoting binary gender stereotypes and overlooking intersectional perspectives. Critics point out that Pearcey’s use of John Gottman’s research is misleading. Gottman’s studies indicate that emotionally intelligent husbands succeed in both egalitarian and hierarchical marriages, but Pearcey omits that her argument falls apart when complementarian men abandon hierarchical behaviors, exposing a significant ideological bias in her work.
Contextualizing These Views
These views reflect a broader conversation within conservative Christian circles about gender roles. Figures like Joel Webbon and Doug Wilson argue against women’s suffrage from a theological standpoint, emphasizing traditional gender roles and critiquing the expansion of women’s public and political presence as contrary to biblical principles. The Southern Baptist Convention’s conservative shift and the rise of New Calvinism further illustrate this trend, as these movements emphasize male-led church governance and promote traditional gender roles.
Motivations Behind the Movements
Supporters of traditional values aim to uphold stability and traditional family roles, rejecting modern feminism and valuing a nurturing home environment. Fear tactics are prevalent in online content that merges wellness with extreme ideologies, manipulating users by promoting fear of worldly dangers, apocalyptic scenarios, or spiritual consequences.
Historical Precedents: Satanic Panic and Moral Panics
Movements like the Satanic Panic of the 1980s and ’90s stoked fears of occult influences, leading to widespread moral panic. Similarly, today’s online narratives can exaggerate or fabricate threats to bolster ideological adherence, using fears of societal collapse or moral decay to urge followers towards conservative values.
Personal Reflections: Manipulation and Belonging
I remember the day I was first drawn into evangelical Christianity. It wasn’t through logic or a carefully reasoned argument; it was through the power of a story—a testimony, to be exact. The speaker shared a dramatic tale of transformation, from the depths of despair and darkness into the light of salvation. Her voice trembled with emotion, and tears glistened in her eyes as she described the overwhelming peace and joy she found in Christ. I was captivated. It wasn’t just a story; it was a call, a plea for me to experience the same miraculous change.
The manipulation was subtle but powerful. The emotions stirred within me were intense, almost overwhelming. I felt a sense of urgency, as if my own life depended on making the same decision she had. It was as though I could feel the darkness closing in on me, and the only escape was to step into the light she described so vividly. Fear played a significant role in this manipulation. I was warned of the dire consequences of rejecting this path, of the eternal damnation that awaited those who turned away. This fear was not just for my soul but for my life here and now. I was told that without Jesus, I would continue to live in confusion, loneliness, and despair.
What made it all the more compelling was the promise of belonging. I had always felt somewhat out of place, disconnected from those around me. But here was a community that promised acceptance, a family where I would always belong. The concept of biblical femininity and submission was introduced as a path to fulfillment, as a way to finally fit into a role that had been designed specifically for me by God. I was told that by embracing my role as a submissive wife and mother, I would find true happiness and purpose.
But looking back, I realize how these tactics exploited my vulnerabilities. The emotional manipulation, the fear-based messaging, and the promise of belonging were all tools used to mold me into someone I wasn’t. They weren’t concerned with my true self; they wanted to shape me into their image of the ideal Christian woman—submissive, obedient, and unquestioning.
What’s more disturbing is how these tactics aren’t unique to evangelical Christianity. I’ve since learned that similar strategies are employed in other religions, such as Islam. I’m sure you’re like me, and have heard that it is the fastest growing religion, but have you looked into the pew research into why? There’s a growing pressure on women within some Islamic communities to recruit other women. They shower potential converts with love, bombarding them with messages of acceptance and sisterhood. It’s all designed to draw them in, to make them feel special and chosen. Once they’re in, the pressure to marry and fulfill their role as a wife and mother can be intense. Just as I was drawn into a community that promised to complete me, these women are often led to believe that their worth is tied to their role within the family and the broader religious community.
The parallels are striking. Both exploit the human need for connection and purpose. Both use emotional manipulation and fear to control and convert. And both can lead to a loss of self, where the individual’s identity is subsumed by the demands of the group.
Reflecting on my experience has been painful, but it’s also been empowering. I now see how I was manipulated, how my fears and desires were used against me. And I’m committed to helping others recognize these tactics for what they are—tools of control, not pathways to truth.
Delving into Christian Interpretations of Morals and Values
As we wrap up today’s discussion, let’s delve into the complexities surrounding Christian interpretations of morals and values, particularly through the lens of historical and cultural relativism. Critics of biblical revelation question the reliability and authenticity of the biblical manuscripts, highlighting the human elements that have shaped the text’s transmission and interpretation.
When it comes to contentious issues like abortion, the selective interpretations of scripture used by some pro-life Christians illustrate a broader trend of reconciling faith with personal and societal values. Historically, Christian views on abortion were more diverse and often more permissive, with significant shifts occurring in the 1970s with the rise of the Religious Right.
Reflecting on these issues, Niel Van Lewen pointed out an intriguing observation: the pro-life stance might often function more as a signaling mechanism than a genuine, consistent commitment to protecting life. This dichotomy suggests that pro-life evangelicals might seek to pass laws protecting unborn embryos while avoiding practical measures—like universal daycare—that could significantly reduce the number of abortions.
This illustrates the ethical and scriptural inconsistencies surrounding the pro-life stance. By examining these discrepancies, we gain a clearer understanding of the challenges inherent in reconciling pro-life advocacy with practical, compassionate approaches to supporting life.
The Trad Wife Controversy: Unpacking Traditional Values in Modern Contexts
The discussion around traditional values and gender roles is gaining momentum, and the “trad wife” movement sits at the heart of this debate. One prime example that brings these ideals to light is the Ballerina Farm controversy, a social media phenomenon showcasing a curated version of traditional domestic life. This aligns closely with the trad wife ideals, which have faced criticism for romanticizing a regressive view on gender roles.
The Ballerina Farm Controversy: Empowerment or Regression?
Ballerina Farm presents a vision of traditional domestic life that resonates with many who see it as an empowering choice. However, it also faces criticism for glamorizing roles that are deeply rooted in patriarchal norms. Houseinhabit, a popular commentator, argues that Ballerina Farm isn’t about regression but about choice. She suggests that Hannah Neeleman, the face behind Ballerina Farm, embodies success measured not by corporate titles but by personal contentment and family harmony, grounded in her faith. This perspective emphasizes that true feminism should respect the diverse paths women take, fostering understanding rather than division.
The Patriarchal Norms Behind the Ideal
While Houseinhabit’s perspective is important, it’s crucial to examine the patriarchal underpinnings of such movements. Practices that might seem problematic to outsiders—like Daniel’s rushed engagement and control over Hannah’s education—are often normalized within their cultural context. These actions reflect broader adherence to patriarchal values, including homeschooling with a Christian Mormon syllabus, underscoring a commitment to traditional gender roles.
Mormon Influencers: A New Recruitment Strategy?
Adding another layer to this discussion is the role of Mormon influencers in social media recruitment. Recent research reveals how the LDS Church uses social media to attract new recruits, with influencers, particularly families, promoting Mormonism on platforms like Instagram and YouTube. This strategy leverages the appeal of traditional family values and domestic harmony to attract a broader audience. The Church’s use of influencers as a recruitment tool highlights the appealing aspects of traditional lifestyles while potentially overshadowing the complexities and criticisms associated with these roles.
Media, Tradition, and Patriarchy
This interplay between traditional values and modern media illustrates a broader societal pattern where the presentation of traditional roles can obscure their roots in patriarchal structures. Media portrayals, while sometimes uncomfortable, are not about dehumanizing individuals but about revealing systemic issues. Often, patriarchal norms are defended as personal choices, overlooking the deep societal influences at play. If gender roles were reversed, these issues might become more apparent, prompting a need for more nuanced discussions on how traditional values intersect with contemporary gender dynamics.
My Experience with Patriarchal Ideologies
Critically evaluating such content is essential, as these narratives can have far-reaching implications for personal beliefs and societal attitudes. From my own experience with evangelical Christianity, I was involved in a biblical counseling program that reinforced patriarchal control, severely limiting my autonomy. In one workbook, I was given an excerpt from The Excellent Wife by Martha Peace, which outlined ways a wife should glorify her husband. The expectations included:
Asking your husband about his goals for the week.
Organizing household duties meticulously, prioritizing your husband’s needs over everything else.
Talking about him positively to others, regardless of the truth.
These teachings were not just fringe ideas but central resources within Biblical Counseling, the Southern Baptist Convention, and many non-denominational churches. This ideology, deeply woven into church communities, perpetuates a system where a wife’s identity and value are entirely subdued under her husband’s goals and image.
The Harmful Implications of Patriarchal Ideologies
Idolatry of the Husband: Obeying a husband is equated with obeying God, placing the husband in the position of an idol. This subordinates divine will to a human figure, distorting spiritual faith and leaving no room for a wife’s autonomy or moral agency.
A Warped View of Womanhood: Women are seen as more susceptible to deception, and their rightful place is akin to a ‘slave’ who should expect no recognition. Basic human desires, like wanting to be treated with kindness, are labeled as ‘idolatrous.’
Enabling Abuse: The book glorifies suffering within marriage as a form of righteousness, encouraging women to endure cruelty and manipulation. This traps women in dangerous, often life-threatening, situations by positioning divorce as rebellion and making church discipline the first recourse instead of contacting authorities.
Stigmatizing Mental Health Care: Seeking professional help is equated with a lack of faith, alienating women from essential support systems that could help them navigate emotional and psychological challenges.
These ideas, while well-intentioned, perpetuate a system where the wife’s identity and value are entirely subdued under her husband’s goals and image. The dangerous implications of this ideology are not confined to overtly religious communities. Similar themes of female submission are found in movements rejecting modern egalitarian values in favor of a constructed ideal of natural order, which often masks deeply patriarchal and oppressive beliefs.
The Bigger Picture: Understanding the Trad Wife Trend
The trad wife trend isn’t just a nostalgic yearning for the past; it’s a deliberate effort to reinstate rigid gender roles that diminish women’s rights and freedoms. By critically examining resources like The Excellent Wife and drawing connections to broader social and cultural trends, we can better understand and challenge the insidious nature of this propaganda.
For those still in the church, it’s crucial to stand up against these harmful teachings. From my own experience, gender norms that emphasize tenderness over assertiveness hinder a woman’s ability to address unfair treatment effectively. Women submitting to their husbands is a dangerous ideology. Research shows that conservative, highly religious men are far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence. Hypermasculinity is one of the most powerful predictors of men’s likelihood to commit assault, and couples where the husband dominates decision-making processes are more likely to experience lower marital satisfaction.
Liberation and Progress
The liberation of women from oppression is crucial for fostering a more equitable and just society. When women are fully liberated, they can contribute their talents, perspectives, and skills to all aspects of life, including politics, economics, and culture. This liberation not only benefits women individually but also leads to societal progress by dismantling systemic barriers and promoting inclusivity.
Conclusion: Opening the Dialogue
I invite you to join the dialogue about gender, family, and cultural norms. Have you observed or encountered these dynamics? As a collective, we cannot ignore the role of algorithms and social media in amplifying compelling narratives and creating echo chambers. Understanding the motivations behind these movements allows us to engage in meaningful dialogue and advocate for continued advancements in gender equality.
Through my journey of deconstructing abuse within the church, I’ve realized that complementarianism, often presented as a theological stance, is fundamentally patriarchal and a root cause of oppression and abuse. Navigating these dynamics helps us grapple with the complexities of today’s ideological landscapes and invites us to critically evaluate how historical precedents and technological influences continue to shape our beliefs and societal structures.
Thank you for joining me in this exploration of faith, ideology, and societal change. Let’s continue to question, reflect, and engage with the world around us. And as always, maintain your curiosity, embrace skepticism, and keep tuning in.
Taste0ftruth Tuesdays 