Welcome back to Taste0ftruth Tuesdays Wellness Warriors and truth seekers!
Listen here 🎧
Fundamentalist thinking doesn’t just reside in religious circles—it also permeates wellness and healing spaces. Just as high-control religions exploit human vulnerability, so does diet culture.
I’ve had my share of blindly following extreme health regimens recommended by practitioners, ignoring my own discomfort along the way. It became clear that fundamentalism can crop up in various aspects of life, and part of healing is about recognizing and addressing these tendencies within us.
High control religion and diet culture both capitalize on the brain’s tendency to interpret things in a binary black-and-white manner by presenting clear-cut rules, guidelines, and belief systems that simplify complex issues into easy-to-follow directives.
Clear Rules and Regulations:
High Control Religion: Provides rigid doctrines, moral codes, and commandments that delineate right from wrong, good from evil, and righteous from sinful.
Diet Culture: Promotes strict dietary regimes, cleanses, and “good” vs. “bad” foods, categorizing eating behaviors as virtuous or detrimental.
In both of these contexts, this black-and-white thinking oversimplifies complex issues related to spirituality and health, offering a sense of clarity and control in exchange for individual autonomy and critical thinking.
I used to be fixated on healing, always chasing the next fix. When I later dove into a high-control religion, this perpetual quest for self-improvement morphed into the religious ritual of sanctification—an equally exhausting endeavor.
Healing should be about presence, connection, and truly living—not an endless pursuit of perfection.
Have you noticed this shift in your own or others’ healing journeys?
Here are some examples of fundamentalist thinking and behaviors found in both high-control religions and wellness/healing spaces:
Aspect
High-Control Religion
Wellness Spaces
Strict Rules and Regulations
Rigid doctrines and moral codes with severe consequences
Strict dietary regimes or detox plans with inflexible guidelines, labeling deviations as harmful or sinful
Authority Figures
Centralized figures with unquestionable teachings
Gurus or practitioners whose advice is taken as absolute truth
Us vs. Them Mentality
Clear divisions between the “righteous” and “sinful” outsiders
Labeling foods, behaviors, or people as “clean” or “toxic,” fostering an in-group/out-group mentality
Fear-Based Tactics
Fear of damnation or punishment to maintain control
Instilling fear of illness or toxins to enforce adherence to wellness practices
Exclusive Truth Claims
Belief that their interpretation of faith is the only truth
Claiming their diet or lifestyle is the only path to true health and well-being
Shame and Guilt
Using shame and guilt to enforce compliance
Shaming individuals for not adhering to specific diets or wellness protocols
Community Pressure
Intense pressure to conform within the community
Social pressure to adhere to specific wellness practices, with fear of ostracism for non-compliance
Promised Rewards
Promises of spiritual rewards or salvation for adherence
Promises of optimal health or purity through strict adherence to wellness practices
Fundamentalist thinking and behaviors found in both
Seeking Clarity during Stress
Gravitating towards fundamentalism after experiencing hyper-charismatic or new age movements can seem understandable. The strict rules and structure provide a perceived sense of safety. Particularly during times of stress and uncertainty, we can gravitate towards the need for a sense of control & structure. However, this rigidity and extreme control often lead to increased trauma over time.
As I deconstruct from the Christian faith, I am re-evaluating beliefs, questioning long-held doctrines, and confronting the challenges faced within spiritually abusive environments.
Fundamentalism’s rigid adherence to traditional beliefs and practices can create significant challenges, fostering environments that can stifle personal freedom, promote division, and sometimes lead to conflict and violence. We also see intolerance towards individuals or groups who hold different beliefs or lifestyles, leading to discrimination, ostracism, or even violence towards perceived “outsiders” or “heretics.”
This is due to the dogmatism, this fundamentalist ideology tends to promote rigid, inflexible interpretations of religious or ideological principles, discouraging questioning or exploration of ANY alternative viewpoints.
Fundamentalists are often resistant to change and innovation within religious doctrine or practice, viewing such developments as departures from true faith.
I recently shared a post on Instagram, reflecting on my journey of deconstruction and exploring progressive spaces, I’ve noticed a concerning trend: the lack of nuance and the prevalence of an ‘us vs. them’ mentality.
Even within progressive Christianity, there’s pressure to conform to certain social norms and ethical behaviors. Disagreement is often met with resistance, and group identity politics can dominate discussions.
Understanding these parallels helps us recognize and challenge fundamentalist thinking in all areas of life, promoting a more balanced and critical approach to wellness and healing, and JUST EXISTING!
Let’s move away from the dualistic thinking and judgment that these ideologies promote, and instead, embrace a more holistic and compassionate path forward.
That’s all I have for you today folks! Thanks again for listening/reading. Next week, we will continue the conversation breaking from Diet Culture and for future episodes:
•Dr. Mark Gregory Karris, author of The Diabiological Trinity Healing Religious Trauma from a Wrathful God, Tormenting Hell & a Sinful Self, Religious Refugees: (De)Constructing Toward Spiritual and Emotional Healing and more •@neilyvanneily is a philosopher and cognitive scientist known for his work in the intersection of religion, cognition, and culture. He holds a Ph.D. in philosophy from Princeton University. We will be discussing his new book- “Religion as Make-Believe,” which offers a thought-provoking analysis of the nature of religious belief and its role in human societies.
•@mburtwrites To discuss Biblical Counseling & a little bit of the evolution of Christian parenting, along with Kelsey McGinnis, they offer a comprehensive exploration of the historical, cultural, ideological, political, and social factors that have influenced Christian parenting over time.
@carielmoore to discuss Franciscan theology: which focuses on simplicity, poverty, and love for all. Inspired by Saint Francis, it’s about imitating Christ and caring for the marginalized. 🌿 she also explores parenting through the lens of spirituality, theology, and childhood liberation ✨
and MORE! Until then, maintain your curiosity, embrace skepticism, and keep tuning in! 🎙️🔒
Have a great week!
🙏 Please help this podcast reach a larger audience in hope to encourage others! To do so: leave a 5⭐️ review and send it to a friend! Thank you for listening! I’d love to hear from you, find me on Instagram! @taste0ftruth or Pinterest!
Fundamentalism refers to a strict adherence to specific theological doctrines typically characterized by a literal interpretation of religious texts. This approach often emphasizes the necessity of returning to the “fundamentals” or original beliefs and practices of a religion. It commonly arises as a reaction against modernist and secular influences perceived to undermine traditional religious values.
Gravitating towards fundamentalism after experiencing hyper-charismatic or new age movements can seem understandable. The strict rules and structure provide a perceived sense of safety. Particularly during times of stress and uncertainty, we can gravitate towards the need for a sense of control & structure. However, this rigidity and extreme control often lead to increased trauma over time.
As I deconstruct from the Christian faith, I am re-evaluating beliefs, questioning long-held doctrines, and confronting the challenges faced within spiritually abusive environments.
Key features of fundamentalism include:
Literalism: Fundamentalists often interpret Scripture texts in a literal or strict manner
Inerrancy: Fundamentalists typically uphold the belief in the inerrancy or infallibility of the Bible, viewing them as the ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice. Aka Biblicists
Separatism: Fundamentalist movements may advocate for the separation of believers from secular society or from other religious groups deemed to be impure or heretical.
Moral Conservatism: Fundamentalists often promote traditional moral values and social norms, opposing practices or lifestyles they perceive as contrary to their religious beliefs.
Resistance to Change: Fundamentalists are often resistant to change and innovation within religious doctrine or practice, viewing such developments as departures from true faith.
Intolerance: Fundamentalist groups may exhibit intolerance towards individuals or groups who hold different beliefs or lifestyles, leading to discrimination, ostracism, or even violence towards perceived “outsiders” or “heretics.”
Dogmatism: Fundamentalist ideology tends to promote rigid, inflexible interpretations of religious or ideological principles, discouraging questioning or exploration of alternative viewpoints.
Anti-intellectualism: Critics argue that fundamentalism can foster distrust or rejection of scientific knowledge, critical thinking, and scholarly inquiry, leading to a rejection of evidence-based reasoning and a preference for simplistic, black-and-white thinking
Potential Dangers to Society:
Intolerance and Division:
Fundamentalist ideologies often promote an “us versus them” mentality, leading to increased intolerance and division within society. This can result in discrimination against those who do not share the same beliefs (Harvard Book Store).
Suppression of Dissent:
In fundamentalist communities, questioning or deviating from established doctrines is often discouraged or outright condemned, suppressing intellectual freedom and critical thinking (Harvard Book Store) (Barnes & Noble).
Extremism and Violence:
Fundamentalist beliefs can sometimes justify extreme actions, including violence, against those perceived as threats to their worldview. This can lead to acts of terrorism or other forms of conflict and aggression (Harvard University Press) (Barnes & Noble).
Impact on Individual Rights:
Fundamentalism often imposes strict moral codes that can infringe on individual rights, particularly affecting women and minorities. Practices such as gender segregation, limitations on freedom of expression, and enforcement of strict behavioral norms are common (Barnes & Noble) (Harvard Book Store).
Resistance to Progress and Change:
Fundamentalist groups frequently resist scientific, social, and cultural advancements, hindering progress in areas such as education, healthcare, and human rights. This resistance can have broad negative impacts on societal development (Harvard Book Store).
Fundamentalism’s rigid adherence to traditional beliefs and practices can create significant challenges, fostering environments that can stifle personal freedom, promote division, and sometimes lead to conflict and violence.
Here are some resources that discuss the dangers of fundamentalism from various perspectives, including academic research, books, and articles:
Books
“The Fundamentalist Mindset: Psychological Perspectives on Religion, Violence, and History” by Charles B. Strozier, David M. Terman, and James W. Jones
This book provides a psychological analysis of the fundamentalist mindset, exploring how it can lead to intolerance, aggression, and violence.
“Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning” by Malise Ruthven
Ruthven examines the roots of fundamentalism in various religions and its socio-political impact, highlighting how it can lead to social fragmentation and conflict.
“The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism” by Karen Armstrong
Armstrong traces the history of fundamentalist movements in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, and discusses their impact on modern society, emphasizing the dangers of dogmatic thinking and resistance to change.
Articles
“The Dangers of Fundamentalism” by Andrew Sullivan (New York Magazine)
This article discusses the social and political dangers of religious fundamentalism, particularly its impact on democracy and individual freedoms. Read here.
“The Psychology of Religious Fundamentalism” by Ralph W. Hood Jr., Peter C. Hill, and W. Paul Williamson (Guilford Press)
This article explores the psychological mechanisms behind religious fundamentalism and its potential to foster rigid, intolerant, and sometimes violent behavior.
“Fundamentalism and the Control of Women” by Patricia Hill Collins (Journal of Women’s History)
Collins discusses how fundamentalist ideologies often lead to the suppression of women’s rights and freedoms, impacting gender equality and social justice.
Academic Papers
“Religious Fundamentalism and Its Impact on Democracy” by Mark Juergensmeyer (Journal of Democracy)
This paper explores how fundamentalist movements challenge democratic values and institutions, posing a threat to pluralism and civil liberties. Read here.
“Fundamentalism and the Paradox of Modernity” by Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby (American Academy of Arts and Sciences)
The authors analyze the paradoxical relationship between fundamentalist movements and modernity, highlighting the resistance to modern values and the implications for societal progress. Read here.
“The Social Psychology of Religious Fundamentalism” by Roy F. Baumeister, Laura Smart, and Joseph M. Boden (Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion)
This paper examines the social psychological aspects of religious fundamentalism, including its impact on group cohesion and intergroup conflict. Read here.
Online Resources
Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life
Pew provides numerous reports and articles on the impact of religious fundamentalism on society, politics, and culture. Visit Pew Research.
BBC: What is Religious Fundamentalism?
A concise overview of religious fundamentalism, its characteristics, and its potential dangers to global security and social harmony. Read here.
These resources provide comprehensive insights into the dangers of fundamentalism, illustrating its potential to foster intolerance, social division, and conflict.
Anger itself isn’t fundamentally a sin; it’s a normal human emotion. However, as many of you know, I experienced spiritual abuse through ACBC Biblical counseling, also known as Nouthetic Counseling. This form of counseling, frequently used by the high-control religion I was part of, often employs various tactics to manipulate individuals into suppressing their anger.
High control religions often manipulate individuals against feeling anger by employing several tactics: 1. **Guilt and Shame**: They teach that anger is sinful or a sign of personal weakness, inducing guilt and shame in individuals who feel it.
2. **Doctrine and Indoctrination**: They emphasize doctrines that label anger as negative or spiritually harmful, encouraging followers to suppress it.
3. **Surveillance and Confession**: Constant surveillance and confession practices make individuals self-police their emotions, including anger.
4. **Isolation**: Isolating individuals from outside influences that might validate their feelings, keeping them within an echo chamber that reinforces the group’s views.
5. **Emotional Suppression**: Promoting emotional suppression as a virtue, advocating for calmness and forgiveness in all situations, often to the detriment of the individual’s mental health.
These methods can deeply impact personal autonomy and emotional well-being, making it difficult for individuals to express or even recognize their anger.
In many religious and philosophical traditions, it’s acknowledged that feeling anger is a normal part of human experience. What can make anger sinful or morally problematic is how one responds to it and the actions it provokes.
The philosopher Aristotle described anger as a passion that, when experienced and expressed appropriately, can be virtuous.
The key is to be angry for the right reasons and in the right way.
Anger is understood as a normal emotional response to perceived threats or injustices. It’s part of the body’s natural fight-or-flight response and can be constructive when it motivates problem-solving and assertiveness.
Yet, High control religions often manipulate feelings of anger by framing them as sinful or spiritually harmful. They may discourage members from expressing anger or dissent, promoting instead the idea of forgiveness and submission to authority. Additionally, they may use guilt or shame to suppress anger, portraying it as a sign of weakness or lack of faith.
In extreme cases, anger may be labeled as a tool of the devil or a hindrance to spiritual growth, further reinforcing control over members’ emotions.
Suppressing anger can lead to negative health effects and mental distress, while constructive expression of anger can lead to positive change and resolution of conflicts.
Gender Roles & Expectations
Boys: Anger is often viewed as a more acceptable and natural response. They are frequently socialized to see anger as a sign of strength or assertiveness.
This can lead to a normalization of more aggressive behaviors and a lack of encouragement to explore other emotional responses.
Girls: In contrast, girls are often discouraged from expressing anger and are instead encouraged to use “nicer voices” or to remain calm and composed.
This reinforces traditional gender roles that value submissiveness, agreeableness, and emotional labor from women.
From a young age, girls are socialized to prioritize the needs of others and maintain harmony in relationships. Being assertive or expressing anger can be seen as disruptive to these social expectations.
Boys, on the other hand, might not receive the same level of guidance on emotional regulation, particularly concerning emotions like vulnerability or sadness, which are often socially discouraged in males.
From a young age, girls are socialized to prioritize the needs of others and maintain harmony in relationships. Being assertive or expressing anger can be seen as disruptive to these social expectations.
Boys, on the other hand, might not receive the same level of guidance on emotional regulation, particularly concerning emotions like vulnerability or sadness, which are often socially discouraged in males.
Long-term Consequences:
The reinforcement of these gender roles can perpetuate a cycle where men and women struggle with different aspects of emotional health. Men might face challenges in expressing vulnerability, while women might struggle with assertiveness and setting boundaries.
In professional and personal relationships, these dynamics can lead to power imbalances and communication issues, affecting everything from career advancement to personal satisfaction.
The way anger and other emotions are socially regulated based on gender reinforces traditional gender roles and affects the emotional development of individuals.
Recognizing and addressing these biases can lead to healthier emotional expressions and relationships for both men and women.
Exploring how religion suppresses emotions involves examining religious teachings, cultural practices, and the interpretation of sacred texts. Here are some resources that delve into this topic from various perspectives:
Books:
“The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love” by bell hooks
This book discusses how cultural norms, often influenced by religious teachings, shape the emotional lives of men, encouraging the suppression of vulnerability and emotional expression.
“Emotion and Religion: A Critical Assessment and Annotated Bibliography” by John Corrigan
This comprehensive work explores the complex relationship between emotion and religion, providing both theoretical discussions and annotated references for further research.
“Holy Tears: Weeping in the Religious Imagination” edited by Kimberley Christine Patton and John Stratton Hawley
This collection of essays examines the role of tears and emotional expression in various religious traditions, offering insights into how certain emotions are both encouraged and suppressed.
“The Varieties of Religious Experience” by William James
Although an older text, James’ exploration of religious experiences includes discussions on how different religions view and handle emotions, including suppression.
Articles:
“Emotion Regulation in Religious Contexts” by Edward R. Canda in the Journal of Religion and Health
This article examines how religious contexts influence emotional regulation, including both the suppression and expression of emotions.
“Religious Influences on Emotion Regulation” by Richard S. Lazarus in the book “Handbook of Emotions”
This chapter discusses how different religious traditions guide the regulation of emotions, often promoting certain emotions while suppressing others.
“Religiosity and Emotion Regulation” by Charlotte van Schie and Michiel van Elk in Frontiers in Psychology
This research article explores how religiosity influences emotional regulation strategies, including suppression.
Academic Papers and Theses:
“Emotion Suppression in Religion: A Study of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim Communities”
This thesis (or dissertation) might be found through university libraries and explores how different religious communities approach emotion suppression.
“The Role of Religion in Emotion Regulation: Insights from a Psychological Perspective” by Kevin L. Ladd and Bernard Spilka in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
This paper provides a psychological perspective on how religious beliefs and practices affect emotional regulation, including suppression.
Online Resources:
Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life
Pew Research often publishes studies and reports on the intersection of religion and various aspects of life, including emotional health and expression.
Psychology Today: Religion and Spirituality
This section of the Psychology Today website features articles on how religion impacts emotional well-being, including the suppression of emotions.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: “Emotion in Christian Philosophy”
This entry explores how Christian philosophy has historically viewed emotions and their expression or suppression.
These resources offer a broad overview of how different religious traditions and interpretations can influence the suppression of emotions. They provide insights from psychological, sociological, and theological perspectives.
Hey hey Truth seekers! Welcome back to Taste of Truth Tuesdays. It’s Megan Leigh here, your host, and today we’re mixing up our usual bite-sized conversations on fitness, nutrition, mindset, and spirituality with something a little different. Buckle up, because we’re diving headfirst into the fascinating (and sometimes unsettling) world of end-times obsession and its connection to conspiracy theories.
This season, we’re all about unpacking trends, debunking myths, and delivering practical tips for living a healthier, more balanced life. But today, we’re taking a detour. Have you ever found yourself tumbling down the rabbit hole of radical ideologies or swept up in the fervor of religious conversion? If so, you’re not alone. In fact, during the pandemic, I saw firsthand how deeply conspiracies and religious movements can intertwine, drawing people in with promises of belonging, purpose, and empowerment.
Picture this: it’s the height of the pandemic. Isolation, uncertainty, and fear are at an all-time high. Suddenly, conspiracy theories start to feel less like fringe ideas and more like a secret society offering answers and clarity. For many, including myself, this seductive pull can lead straight into the arms of cult-like dynamics. Let’s rewind a bit so I can share my journey.
From 2016 to 2020, I was caught in the grip of multi-level marketing (MLM) schemes. You know the ones—alluring promises of financial freedom and community, flashy products that claim to change your life but often come with unrealistic body standards and toxic relationships with food. At the time, I was searching for connection and a sense of control, but instead, I found myself hooked like a fish on a line, reeled into a world that felt more like a trap the deeper I went.
Now it’s 2020, the beginning of the pandemic, and I found myself knee-deep in conspiracy theories faster than you can say “tin foil hat.” Before I knew it, I was lured into the clutches of a high-control religion, complete with charismatic leaders and an intense “us versus them” mentality. Are you buckled up, folks? Good, because we’re about to embark on a wild ride through the intriguing world of religious prophecy, biblical interpretations, and the end-times obsession that has everyone talking.
Imagine modern American culture—a melting pot of beliefs and ideologies—stirred up with a hefty dose of religious prophecy. For centuries, Christians have been captivated by the idea of the apocalypse, with theological discussions diving deep into the mysterious realms of biblical prophecy. But hold onto your hats, because things have kicked into high gear in recent times. By “recent,” I mean the last 100-200 years. Evangelical Christians, in particular, have cranked their confidence levels to 11, interpreting every hiccup in current events as a surefire sign that the end is near.
Let’s rewind a little to the 19th century. This was a time of upheaval and change, where discoveries in science and historical criticism were turning the world on its head. This era sparked a renewed fervor for interpreting religious texts through a literal lens—a trend that still echoes today. Critics of the literal hermeneutic argue that it can be overly simplistic and fails to account for the complexities and nuances of ancient texts. They contend that a purely literal interpretation can overlook metaphorical or symbolic meanings, cultural contexts, and the evolving nature of language over time. Additionally, critics suggest that such an approach may lead to fundamentalism and rigid dogmatism rather than a deeper understanding of the text.
The lie of Biblical Inerrancy
And let’s not forget about the false doctrine of biblical inerrancy, another shiny new invention from the 19th century. Rogers and McKim argued that the Princeton theologians of the 19th and early 20th centuries, most notably B.B. Warfield, created the doctrine of inerrancy, which teaches that the Bible is entirely without error in all that it affirms. This little gem teaches that the Bible is without error—a claim that’s got more holes than a block of Swiss cheese. By focusing so heavily on inerrancy, proponents often miss the deeper, more nuanced messages these texts are trying to convey. 🚩🚩Read my blog: Rethinking biblical inerrancy.
Since the publication of C.I. Scofield’s edition of the King James Version in 1909, premillennial dispensationalism came to dominate evangelical thought. Premillennial Dispensationalism is a Christian theological perspective that combines premillennialism with dispensationalism. Here’s a breakdown of the components:
Premillennialism: This is the belief that Jesus Christ will return to Earth before (pre-) a thousand-year period of peace and righteousness known as the Millennium. According to premillennialists, the Second Coming of Christ will precede this millennial reign, during which Christ will physically rule on Earth.
Dispensationalism: This is a framework for interpreting the Bible that divides history into distinct periods or “dispensations.” Each dispensation is seen as a specific way in which God interacts with humanity. Dispensationalists typically identify seven such periods, ranging from the time of innocence in the Garden of Eden to the millennial kingdom and beyond.
When combined, Premillennial Dispensationalism holds that:
We are currently living in a dispensation known as the “Church Age,” which will end with the rapture of the church, where believers are taken up to meet Christ in the air.
This event will be followed by a seven-year period of tribulation, characterized by widespread suffering and the rise of the Antichrist.
At the end of the tribulation, Christ will return to Earth to defeat the forces of evil in the Battle of Armageddon.
Following this, Christ will establish His millennial kingdom, reigning for a thousand years of peace and justice.
After the Millennium, there will be a final rebellion, followed by the last judgment and the creation of a new heaven and a new earth.
Influence on Evangelical and Fundamentalist Thought
Widespread Adoption: The Scofield Reference Bible became a staple in many evangelical and fundamentalist seminaries, churches, and homes, solidifying dispensationalism’s dominance in American evangelicalism.
Theological Education: Institutions such as Dallas Theological Seminary, including prominent figures like Dwight Pentecost and John F. Walvoord, and Moody Bible Institute became centers for dispensationalist teaching, training generations of pastors, theologians, and missionaries.
Popular Culture: Dispensationalist ideas have permeated popular culture, particularly through books like Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” and the “Left Behind” series by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, which present fictionalized accounts of the rapture and tribulation period.
Political Influence: Dispensationalist beliefs have influenced the political views of many evangelicals, particularly regarding support for the state of Israel, which is seen as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
Dispensationalist beliefs have significantly influenced the political views of many evangelicals, particularly regarding support for the state of Israel, which is seen as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. This theological perspective interprets the establishment of Israel in 1948 as a pivotal event in God’s prophetic timeline, intensifying evangelical support for Israel in both religious and political spheres.
Historical Context and Political Engagement
The late 20th century marked a shift from evangelical separatism to active political engagement, notably through the emergence of the Christian Right. Influential figures like Jerry Falwell, founder of the Moral Majority in 1979, emphasized unwavering support for Israel, viewing its existence as central to divine prophecy. Falwell’s trips to Israel, sponsored by the Israeli government, underscored this commitment, and he became a prominent advocate for pro-Israel U.S. foreign policy.
This period also saw the rise of dispensationalist literature, such as Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth,” which linked contemporary events to biblical prophecies, further galvanizing evangelical support for Israel. Such works suggested that geopolitical developments involving Israel were direct fulfillments of scripture, reinforcing the theological imperative to support the Jewish state.
Contemporary Political Influence
In recent years, dispensationalist beliefs continue to shape evangelical political perspectives. Support for Israel remains a pivotal issue, often influencing voting patterns and policy advocacy. For instance, during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, evangelical leaders emphasized the importance of backing Israel, equating it with other core issues like pro-life advocacy. Ralph Reed, founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, stated that support for Israel rivals pro-life issues in evangelical importance, highlighting the enduring impact of dispensationalist theology on political priorities.
Furthermore, political figures have recognized and appealed to this demographic. Former President Donald Trump, for example, acknowledged the strong support for Israel among evangelical Christians, noting that “Christians love Israel more than Jews.” This statement reflects the deep-seated theological convictions that drive evangelical support for Israel, rooted in dispensationalist interpretations of biblical prophecy.
Critiques and Considerations
While dispensationalist-driven support for Israel is significant, it is not without controversy. My concern here is that such theological perspectives can lead to uncritical political alliances, potentially overlooking complex geopolitical realities and ethical considerations. The intertwining of religious prophecy with foreign policy raises questions about the implications of basing political decisions on specific theological interpretations.
Dispensationalist beliefs have profoundly influenced evangelical political views, particularly regarding support for Israel. This theological framework interprets the modern state of Israel as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy, driving political engagement and shaping policy advocacy among evangelicals.
One of the telltale signs of this belief is the date-setting historicism of figures like Hal Lindsey (which I mentioned on my testimony podcast episode, if you remember) who identify current events as the fulfillment of biblical prophecies. Here are a few more examples to watch out for! 🚩
David Jeremiah: Senior pastor of Shadow Mountain Community Church and author of several books on prophecy and end times, Jeremiah is a well-known contemporary dispensationalist preacher.
Chuck Missler: Chuck Missler (1934-2018) was a prominent figure in evangelical Christian circles, known for his deep and often controversial insights into biblical prophecy and end times. He was the founder of Koinonia House, a ministry dedicated to providing biblical teaching through various media.
Key Points about Chuck Missler:
Biblical Prophecy and Eschatology: Missler was well-known for his detailed studies on the book of Revelation and other prophetic scriptures.
Integration of Science and Scripture: He often discussed topics like quantum physics, extraterrestrial life, and the technological advancements in relation to biblical texts, aiming to show that modern science supports the Bible. 🚩
Controversial Views: His unconventional perspectives sometimes placed him on the fringes of mainstream evangelical thought, making him a figure of interest in conspiracy theory circles.
Promoted by Conspiracy Pages: Missler’s work has found a following among conspiracy theorist communities, including social media accounts like kingkat2.0.
Thomas Ice: Executive Director of the Pre-Trib Research Center, Ice is a prominent scholar and proponent of dispensational premillennialism.
Dave Hunt: Known for his critical works on Catholicism, mysticism, and New Age practices, Hunt was an influential figure in evangelical circles. His books often weave biblical prophecy with contemporary events, painting a picture of a world on the brink of divine judgment. 🚩 Hunt’s tendency to overemphasize conspiratorial themes, such as connections between the Vatican and global control, exemplifies the merging of theological and speculative narratives.
So, what’s the bottom line?
These ideologies offer a simplistic worldview where believers feel part of an exclusive group with hidden knowledge and a righteous mission from the big guy upstairs. Conspiracies can provide a framework for interpreting the world and understanding perceived injustices or challenges. They often exploit feelings of fear, uncertainty, and distrust, portraying religious or ideological adversaries as sinister forces working against the believer’s values.
As someone who has walked this path, I want to shed light on how these patterns develop and how we can break free from their grip. In today’s episode, we’ll explore the tactics that draw people into these worlds, the warning signs to watch for, and most importantly, how to reclaim your sense of self and create a balanced, fulfilling life beyond the allure of quick fixes and easy answers.
So, whether you’re curious about the psychology behind these phenomena or looking to make sense of your own experiences, this episode is for you. Together, we’ll unravel the mysteries of these enticing yet dangerous dynamics, one thread at a time.
Whether it’s an MLM, a conspiracy theory, or a religious sect, they all have one thing in common—they thrive on manipulation and exploitation. 😈 From emotional vulnerabilities to charismatic leaders who skillfully manipulate followers, these groups use tactics designed to control and exploit individuals for their own gain.
They often prey on people’s fears, insecurities, and desires for belonging, creating an environment where critical thinking is suppressed, and loyalty is demanded. By promising quick solutions, ultimate truths, or exclusive knowledge, they ensnare individuals into cycles of dependence and obedience, all while profiting from their followers’ dedication and sacrifice.
High control religions often employ a variety of psychological techniques that can be categorized as brainwashing to maintain control over their members. These methods can be understood through the following key strategies:
1. Isolation
Physical Isolation: Members may be encouraged or required to live in communal settings away from the outside world, reducing their exposure to differing opinions.
Social Isolation: Members are often discouraged from associating with outsiders, including family and friends who are not part of the religion, leading to an echo chamber effect.
2. Control of Information
Censorship: Access to information, particularly from outside sources, is heavily restricted. Members are often told to avoid books, websites, and media that might criticize or contradict the group’s teachings.
Propaganda: The group provides a controlled flow of information that consistently reinforces its beliefs and practices. This includes frequent meetings, sermons, and literature that promote the group’s ideology.
3. Induced Dependency
Emotional Dependency: The group fosters a sense of dependency by portraying itself as the sole source of spiritual truth and salvation. Leaving the group is often presented as leading to spiritual ruin or eternal damnation.
Economic Dependency: Members might be financially dependent on the group through communal living, shared resources, or expectations to donate a significant portion of their income.
4. Manipulation of Emotions
Fear and Guilt: High control religions often use fear tactics, such as threats of punishment, divine retribution, or ostracism, to maintain control. Guilt is also used to manipulate members into conforming to group norms and practices.
Love Bombing: New members often receive an overwhelming amount of attention and affection, creating a sense of belonging and making them more receptive to the group’s influence.
5. Cognitive Dissonance
Conflicting Information: The group may present conflicting doctrines or teachings that create cognitive dissonance. Members are then encouraged to resolve this dissonance by accepting the group’s explanation or by attributing any doubts to their own lack of faith or understanding.
Repetitive Messaging: Constant repetition of the group’s ideology helps to internalize beliefs, making it harder for members to question or think critically about them.
6. Control of the Environment
Regulation of Environment: The group regulates the environment of its members through strict schedules, rituals, and practices. This control extends to aspects of daily life, including diet, dress, sleep, and social interactions.
Totalist Doctrine: The group’s doctrine is presented as the absolute and only truth. Any dissent or deviation is harshly punished or suppressed.
7. Loss of Identity OR Identity Confusion
Role Confusion: Members are often given new identities or roles that are closely tied to the group’s ideology. This can include new names, titles, or responsibilities that align with the group’s goals.
Erosion of Personal Boundaries: Personal boundaries are often dissolved, with the group demanding complete loyalty and submission to its leaders and teachings.
8. Exploitation of Psychological Vulnerabilities
Targeting Vulnerable Individuals: High control religions often target individuals who are experiencing personal crises, loneliness, or seeking meaning in life. These individuals are more susceptible to the group’s message and control techniques.
Gradual Indoctrination: The process of indoctrination is typically gradual, starting with mild teachings and escalating to more extreme beliefs and practices as the member becomes more deeply involved.
By employing these techniques, high control religions can significantly influence and control their members’ thoughts, emotions, and behaviors, creating a closed system that is resistant to outside influence and critical thinking.
For a deeper understanding of brainwashing and related psychological manipulation techniques, you can explore a variety of resources spanning books, academic papers, and credible online articles. Here are some notable recommendations:
### Books 1. **”Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism” by Robert Jay Lifton**: This seminal work offers a detailed examination of brainwashing techniques used during the Chinese thought reform programs. 2. **”Cults in Our Midst: The Hidden Menace in Our Everyday Lives” by Margaret Thaler Singer and Janja Lalich**: This book provides insights into the psychological mechanisms of cults and brainwashing. 3. **”Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion” by Robert B. Cialdini**: While not exclusively about brainwashing, this book explores the principles of influence and manipulation. 4. **”Combatting Cult Mind Control” by Steven Hassan**: This book by a former cult member and mental health counselor offers practical advice and personal insights into the process of mind control and how to counter it.
### Academic Articles 1. **”Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control” by Kathleen Taylor**: This article, and the book of the same name, delve into the scientific basis of brainwashing and its effects on the brain. 2. **”Psychological Coercion and Human Rights: Exploring the Notion of Brainwashing”**: Various academic journals explore the intersection of psychological coercion and human rights, providing theoretical and empirical insights.
### Online Resources 1. **The International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA)**: Their website offers a wealth of articles, research papers, and resources on brainwashing, mind control, and cultic studies. 2. **APA PsycNet**: The American Psychological Association’s database provides access to numerous scholarly articles on brainwashing and related topics. 3. **TED Talks and Documentaries**: Several TED Talks and documentaries explore the impact of psychological manipulation and brainwashing, offering both expert insights and personal stories.
By exploring these resources, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, effects, and countermeasures related to brainwashing.
Hypermasculinity is a psychological term describing the exaggeration of male stereotypical behavior, emphasizing traits such as physical strength, aggression, and sexuality.
It involves an overemphasis on traditional masculine traits and behaviors, often to the exclusion of traits considered less traditionally masculine, such as empathy and emotional expression.
Hypermasculinity can lead to harmful behaviors and attitudes, including misogyny, homophobia, and violence, and is often perpetuated by cultural norms and media representations.
🏴☠️A Meta-analysis of 39 studies found hyper masculinity to be one of the most powerful predictors of men’s likelihood to commit assault. 🏴☠️
Pastors like Mark Driscoll, John Piper, John MacArthur, Steven Furtick, Robert Jeffress (to name a few) emphasize traditional masculine characteristics while downplaying traits that they perceive as “soft” or non-conforming to traditional gender norms.
Hyper masculinity within the church can take various forms including:
1. **Emphasis on Aggression**: Promoting the idea that men should be aggressive, assertive, and dominant, which can lead to conflict and hostility rather than fostering understanding and compassion.
2. **Rigid Gender Roles**: Enforcing strict gender roles where men are expected to be the leaders and decision-makers while women are relegated to supporting roles, limiting both men and women’s potential within the church.
3. **Resistance to Vulnerability**: Discouraging men from showing vulnerability or seeking help, leading to emotional repression and isolation, which contradicts the Christian values of empathy and support.
4. **Denigration of Feminine Traits**: Devaluing traits traditionally associated with femininity, such as sensitivity or nurturing, and promoting a narrow view of masculinity that excludes these qualities.
5. **Preoccupation with Power and Control**: Focusing excessively on maintaining power and control within the church hierarchy, rather than promoting humility, servanthood, and cooperation.
6. **Misuse of Scripture**: Misinterpreting or selectively using biblical passages to justify patriarchal structures and behaviors, rather than interpreting them in a way that promotes equality and mutual respect.
Conservative churches EVERYWHERE may perpetuate hypermasculinity through various means, including:
Gender Role Expectations: Conservative churches often promote traditional gender roles where men are expected to be strong, assertive leaders while women are expected to be nurturing and submissive. This reinforcement of rigid gender norms can contribute to the perpetuation of hypermasculine ideals.
Preaching and Teaching: Sermons and teachings in conservative churches may emphasize masculine traits such as dominance, power, and control, while downplaying or devaluing traits traditionally associated with femininity. This messaging can reinforce hypermasculine behaviors and attitudes.
Leadership Structure: Conservative churches may have hierarchical leadership structures where men hold positions of authority and power, while women are excluded from leadership roles or relegated to supporting roles. This reinforces the idea that leadership and authority are inherently masculine qualities.
Socialization of Boys: Conservative churches may socialize boys from a young age to conform to hypermasculine ideals through youth groups, boys’ clubs, and other activities that emphasize competitiveness, toughness, and aggression.
Response to Change: Conservative churches may resist societal changes that challenge traditional gender roles and masculinity, leading to a reinforcement of hypermasculine attitudes in response to perceived threats to traditional values.
Overall, conservative churches can contribute to the perpetuation of hypermasculinity through their teachings, practices, and socialization processes, which can have harmful effects on individuals and communities.
I hope by providing these examples it helps to illustrate how hyper masculinity within the church can distort Christian teachings and harm both individuals and the community as a whole.
To learn more about hypermasculinity and its societal impact, you can explore various academic journals, books, and online resources. Here are some recommendations:
Academic Journals:
“Psychology of Men & Masculinities”
“Men and Masculinities”
“Journal of Gender Studies”
“Feminism & Psychology”
Books:
“The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love” by bell hooks
“Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men” by Michael Kimmel
“Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era” by Michael Kimmel
“The Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help” by Jackson Katz
“Raising Cain: Protecting the Emotional Life of Boys” by Dan Kindlon and Michael Thompson
Online Resources:
Websites of organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA) or the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) often have articles and resources related to masculinity and mental health.
TED Talks and YouTube channels featuring talks by psychologists, sociologists, and activists discussing masculinity and its impact on society.
Online forums and communities where individuals share personal experiences and insights about masculinity and gender roles.
These resources provide a range of perspectives and insights into hypermasculinity and its effects on individuals and society.
The idea of biblical womanhood is more about human power structures than the message of Christ. When we examine church history, we can challenge the notion that this belief is inherently biblical.
In the early Christian church, there are several examples of female apostles and leaders:
Mary Magdalene: Mary Magdalene is one of the most prominent figures in the New Testament and is often referred to as the “apostle to the apostles.” She was present at Jesus’ crucifixion, burial, and resurrection, and she was the first to witness the risen Christ and announce his resurrection to the disciples.
Priscilla: Priscilla, along with her husband Aquila, played a significant role in the early Christian church. They are mentioned several times in the New Testament, often as fellow workers with Paul. Priscilla is commended for her teaching and ministry alongside her husband.
Junia: Junia is mentioned by Paul in his letter to the Romans as being “outstanding among the apostles.” This indicates that she held a significant leadership role in the early church and was recognized by Paul as a fellow apostle.
Phoebe: Phoebe is mentioned by Paul in his letter to the Romans as a deaconess or servant of the church in Cenchreae. She is commended for her service to the church and is likely to have held a leadership role.
These are just a few examples of the many women who played important roles in the early Christian church as apostles, leaders, and ministers. Their contributions highlight the diversity and inclusivity of the early Christian community.
The conservative ⛪️ promotes dangerous ideologies-women submitting to men aka Complementarianism.
This ideology has connections to movements like the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW), which promotes complementarianism and traditional gender roles within conservative Evangelicalism.
This started the rise of New Calvinism, spearheaded by influential figures such as John Piper, John MacArthur, and Mark Driscoll, further reinforcing these gender roles. 🚩
Female gender norms that emphasize tenderness over assertiveness hinder women’s ability to assert themselves and address unfair treatment effectively.
🚨 Women submitting to their husband is a dangerous ideology. 🚨
A major cause of s*xual mistreatment is societal: the structural inequality that gives men power over women.
The IFS report that showed that conservative highly religious men were far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence.
🏴☠️A Meta-analysis of 39 studies found hyper-masculinity to be one of the most powerful predictors of men’s likelihood to commit assault. 🏴☠️
Couples where the husband dominated decision-making were 2.6 times more likely to experience lower marital satisfaction compared to those who made decisions collaboratively.
This is why ab*se is so common in the ⛪️.
It’s the theology that’s bad. Not just how it’s interpreted.
As I’ve said before, it was deeply painful, realizing I had been influenced by the dangerous lies behind Nancy Pearcey’s book The Toxic War on Masculinity. Which was heavily promoted by David Wolcott, Alisa Childers, Alexa Clark & Frank Turek, who are often associated with right-wing fundamentalist Christianity. 🚩
She said “There’s no need to debate complementarianism or egalitarianism when it comes to marriage” 𝔸𝕔𝕥𝕦𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 ℕ𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕪, 𝕎𝕖 𝔻𝕠! Pearcey pulls findings from Gottman’s work, citing that in both egalitarian & hierarchical marriages “emotionally intelligent husbands have figured out the one big thing: how to convey honor and respect.” Thus, she claims, labels don’t matter.
However, she omits to mention the big finding Gottman uses to frame this entire chapter: Complementarian men only do well when they don’t act out hierarchy and put aside their beliefs. You can’t claim beliefs in complementarianism are irrelevant by quoting someone who found acting out those beliefs is disastrous.
This is only ONE of the major criticisms of the book pointing to the lack of empirical evidence to support the claims made in the book, particularly regarding the alleged “war on masculinity.” For more read this!
🚨 We should consider the consequences of promoting ideological narratives without empirical support. 🚨
The liberation of women from oppression is crucial for fostering a more equitable and just society.
When women are liberated, they can fully contribute their talents, perspectives, and skills to all aspects of life, including politics, economics, and culture. This liberation not only benefits women individually but also lead to societal progress by dismantling systemic barriers and promoting inclusivity.
Moreover, when women are empowered, it creates a ripple effect, positively impacting families, communities, and future generations. Ultimately, achieving gender equality and women’s liberation is essential for building a more prosperous and harmonious world for all.
Sources: Sheila Wray Gregoire and Joanna Sawatsky
For more ℹ️ •The Bible vs Biblical womanhood by Philip Payne critically examines the concept of “biblical womanhood” and challenges traditional interpretations of scripture that restrict the roles and authority of women in the church. Payne argues that many teachings on gender roles are based on cultural assumptions rather than biblical principles. He examines key passages in the Bible that are often used to support the subjugation of women and offers alternative interpretations that affirm the equality and dignity of women. Payne’s work is a scholarly exploration of the biblical texts related to gender and offers a fresh perspective on the role of women in the church and society. •Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters by Philip Barton Payne Philip Barton Payne is a comprehensive exploration of the biblical teachings regarding gender equality and roles within the Christian community. Payne examines Paul’s letters with a focus on understanding the true meaning behind passages often used to support hierarchical gender relationships. He argues that Paul’s writings affirm the equality of men and women in Christ and that traditional interpretations promoting male authority over women are based on misunderstandings or misinterpretations. Payne provides exegetical analysis and theological insights to support his argument, offering a scholarly perspective on gender equality within the church. Overall, the book challenges traditional views on gender roles and provides a compelling case for the equality of men and women in Christ. •Terran Williams’-How God Sees Women-explores the biblical perspective on the role and value of women in Christianity. Through a careful examination of scripture, Williams challenges traditional interpretations that have marginalized women and restricted their participation in religious life. He argues that God views women as equal partners with men in his divine plan and emphasizes the importance of empowering women within the church. Williams’ work offers a refreshing and inclusive perspective on gender equality within Christianity, inviting readers to reconsider their understanding of women’s roles in faith and society •The Making of Biblical Womanhood How the Subjugation of Women became Gospel Truth by Beth Allison Barr This book explores the historical development of gender roles within Christianity. Barr delves into the roots of traditional teachings on gender roles, revealing how they evolved over time and became ingrained as gospel truth. Drawing on historical research, Barr challenges the notion that traditional gender roles are biblical, arguing that they are instead products of cultural and theological developments. She examines key historical figures and events that shaped these teachings, shedding light on the ways in which women’s roles have been subjugated within the church. Ultimately, Barr advocates for a more egalitarian interpretation of scripture and a reevaluation of traditional teachings on gender within Christianity. Her book offers a thought-provoking critique of gender hierarchy in the church and calls for a reexamination of biblical womanhood. •Marg Mowczko’s work focuses on biblical studies and gender equality within Christianity. Through her writing and research, she explores various passages of scripture to challenge traditional interpretations that have limited the roles of women in the church. Mowczko argues for a more inclusive understanding of women’s participation in ministry, leadership, and theological scholarship. She highlights the presence of female leaders, apostles, and prophets in the early Christian church, advocating for their recognition and empowerment in contemporary religious communities. Mowczko’s work contributes to ongoing discussions about gender equality and biblical interpretation, inspiring readers to reevaluate their understanding of women’s roles in faith and spirituality.
MORE SOURCES: The IFS report that showed that conservative highly religious men were far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence (p. 36): -https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/reports/worldfamilymap-2019-051819.pdf -https://baptistnews.com/article/do-complementarian-men-do-better-a-response-to-nancy-pearcey/ -https://leo-cruz.medium.com/nancy-pearcey-pt1-44f98c2a3602
“Another wave of rejection surfaced when people either shamed us for not being in church or stopped talking to us all together. It left me wondering whether I was truly accepted by God–his people surely weren’t making me feel that way, except when I did what they wanted me to do” -Karl Forehand Out into the Desert
The Deconstruction of Christianity is something I’ve heard of since stepping into the world of theology, but I never thought I’d find myself smack dab in the middle of the movement. #deconstructioncommunity
Disentangling or #deconstruction is a phenomenon where individuals, often within the Christian faith, critically reevaluate their beliefs, doctrines, and practices. This process involves questioning and challenging long-held assumptions, teachings, and traditions within Christianity, with the goal of arriving at a more authentic and personally meaningful understanding of #faith.
The 𝑓𝑒𝑎𝑟 of rejection from God, from others, and actual rejection from others can feel suffocating as negative emotions become all consuming.
The feeling of loneliness when working through one’s doubts, questions and the decision to move away from harmful religious teachings can feel unbearable.
#Religioustrauma refers to psychological, emotional, or social harm caused by religious beliefs, practices, or communities.
Here are some quick facts:
1. **Definition**: It encompasses experiences of guilt, shame, fear, and anxiety resulting from religious teachings, practices, or communities.
2. **Causes**: It can stem from rigid dogma, abusive religious leaders, or pressure to conform to specific beliefs.
3. **Symptoms**: Symptoms may include anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, and difficulty trusting others.
4. **Triggers**: Certain events or experiences may trigger religious trauma, such as leaving a religious community, questioning beliefs, or encountering religious lingo.
5. **Treatment**: Treatment often involves therapy, support groups, and finding new sources of meaning and community.
6. **Impact**: Religious trauma can have long-lasting effects on individuals’ mental health, relationships, and sense of identity.
7. **Awareness**: Awareness of religious trauma is growing, leading to more resources and support for those affected.
“Religious trauma is the emotional and psychological damage caused by harmful religious experiences or teachings. It can result from authoritarianism, legalism, fear-based theology, and other forms of spiritual abuse.”
“Deconstruction often involves revisiting and reevaluating one’s religious upbringing, which can bring to light past trauma and contribute to healing.”
“The deconstruction movement recognizes the importance of addressing religious trauma and creating safe spaces for individuals to explore their beliefs without fear of judgment or retribution.”
“For many, deconstruction is not just about questioning beliefs, but also about processing and healing from religious trauma.”
“Navigating the deconstruction journey can be challenging, especially for those who have experienced religious trauma. It requires courage, self-compassion, and support from others who understand.”
The book When Religion Hurts you has served as a beacon of support and empowerment for those of us who are navigating the complexities of disentanglement from restrictive religious beliefs. It offers validation, guidance, and solidarity to individuals who are embarking on this journey.
“Complementarian men only do well when they don’t act out hierarchy and put aside their beliefs.” John Gottman of the world-renowned Gottman Institute.
A big part of my deconstruction process was realizing the dangerous lies behind Nancy Pearcey’s book The Toxic War on Masculinity. Which was heavily promoted by David Wolcott, Alisa Childers, Alexa Clark & Frank Turek, who are often associated with right-wing fundamentalist Christianity. 🚩It was such a disappointment to find out that this book, touted as a high quality, scholarly work, was clearly just an opinion piece full of logical fallacies, misrepresentation of research data, and poor quality (non-peer reviewed) sources.
She said “There’s no need to debate complementarianism or egalitarianism when it comes to marriage” 𝔸𝕔𝕥𝕦𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 ℕ𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕪, 𝕎𝕖 𝔻𝕠!
Pearcey pulls findings from Gottman’s work, citing that in both egalitarian & hierarchical marriages “emotionally intelligent husbands have figured out the one big thing: how to convey honor and respect.” Thus, she claims, labels don’t matter.
However, she omits to mention the big finding Gottman uses to frame this entire chapter: Complementarian men only do well when they don’t act out hierarchy and put aside their beliefs. You can’t claim beliefs in complementarianism are irrelevant by quoting someone who found acting out those beliefs is disastrous.
This is only ONE of the major criticisms of the book pointing to the lack of empirical evidence to support the claims made in the book, particularly regarding the alleged “war on masculinity.”
🚨 We should consider the consequences of promoting ideological narratives without empirical support. 🚨
Other concerns but not limited to:
Oversimplification of Gender Issues: Critics argue that Pearcey’s book oversimplifies complex gender issues by framing them as a “war on masculinity.” They suggest that this framing perpetuates a binary view of gender and fails to adequately address the diverse experiences and identities of individuals across the gender spectrum.
Perpetuating Gender Stereotypes: Critics contend that Pearcey’s characterization of masculinity as under attack reinforces traditional gender stereotypes and norms, which may contribute to harmful social expectations and restricts the freedom of individuals to express their gender identity authentically.
Lack of Intersectionality: Some critics argue that Pearcey’s analysis lacks intersectionality, as it fails to consider how factors such as race, class, sexuality, and disability intersect with gender to shape individuals’ experiences and social realities. This omission may result in a limited understanding of the complexity of gender dynamics.
Ideological Bias: Some critics suggest that Pearcey’s perspective reflects a conservative or right-wing ideological bias, as she tends to frame gender issues within a traditional Christian worldview. This ideological framing may alienate readers with different religious or philosophical beliefs and limit the book’s appeal to a narrow audience.
Nancy claimed in the book and on a podcast interview that women’s suffrage was a net loss!!!! This is dominionism aka Christian Nationalism.
This is a whole ‘nother rabbit hole, connected to the TRAD wife movement/conservative resurgence… let’s get into it a bit….
Beginning in 1979, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) experienced an intense struggle for control of the organization. Its initiators called it the conservative resurgence while its detractors labeled it the fundamentalist takeover. It was launched with the charge that the seminaries and denominational agencies were dominated by liberals. The movement was primarily aimed at reorienting the denomination away from a liberal trajectory.
This led to the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) At a 1986 meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society (ETS), Wayne Grudem gave a speech on “Manhood and Womanhood in Biblical and Theological Perspectives” in which he invited delegates to join “a new organization dedicated to upholding both equality and differences between men and women in marriage and the church.”[11] This was followed by a meeting in Dallas with Grudem, John Piper etc.
A subsequent meeting was held in Danvers, Massachusetts; at this meeting, the Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood was finalized. coining the term “complementarianism” in 1988.
This is connected to New Calvinism, also known as the Young, Restless, and Reformed Movement, is a movement within conservative Evangelicalism that reinterprets 16th century Calvinism under contemporary US values and ideologies.
The New Calvinism movement started in the 1980s, with the founding of the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood in 1987 in the United States, which stresses the complementarianism between men and women (in contrast to egalitarianism, and as opposed to feminism). The teaching of covenant theology (as opposed to Wesleyanism, or Arminian theology), a rejection of dispensationalism, and a church governance by male elders are also hallmarks of the movement.
The movement gained wider publicity with a conference held in Louisville, Kentucky, in 2006, Together for the Gospel by American pastors John Piper, Mark Driscoll, John MacArthur, Matt Chandler, Al Mohler, Mark Dever and CJ Mahaney. In March 2009, Time magazine ranked it as one of the “10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now”, while questioning if “more Christians searching for security will submit their wills to the austerely demanding God of their country’s infancy”.
Dominion theology, also known as dominionism, is a group of Christian political ideologies that seek to institute a nation governed by Christians and based on their understandings of biblical law. Extents of rule and ways of acquiring governing authority are varied. For example, dominion theology can include theonomy but does not necessarily involve advocacy of adherence to the Mosaic Law as the basis of government. The label is primarily applied to groups of Christians in the United States.
For further reading: •The Bible vs Biblical womanhood by Philip Payne •Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters by Philip Barton Payne •Terran Williams’ Book How God Sees Women •The Making of Biblical Womanhood How the Subjugation of Women became Gospel Truth by Beth Allison Barr •Marg Mowczko’s work
👇🏻Sources: Sheila Wray Gregoire and Joanna Sawatsky 👇🏻 👇🏻
The IFS report that showed that conservative highly religious men were far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence (p. 36):
MORE Resources: – Susan Ware, Why They Marched: Untold Stories of the Women Who Fought for the Right to Vote (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press) – Anita Anand, Sophia: Princess, Suffragette, Revolutionary (New York: Bloomsbury) – Manuela Thurner, “’Better Citizens without the Ballot’: American AntiSuffrage Women and Their Rationale During the Progressive Era,” Journal of Women’s History 5:1 (Spring 1993), 33-60 – Hallie Rubenhold, The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper (New York: Mariner Books An Imprint of HarperCollins) – Martha S. Jones, Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All (New York: Basic Books)
As y’all know, the deconstruction of Christianity is something I’ve heard of since stepping into the world of theology, but I never thought I’d find myself smack dab in the middle of the movement. There were numerous aspects that led me to begin unraveling, the real smack upside the head, realizing I was within a spiritual abusive biblical counseling relationship and program, that led me to notice the brutal similarities of abuse within IHOPKC, the scandals within the Grace Community Church & ACBC Biblical/Nouthetic counseling. Cover-ups of abuse within the church are deeply troubling & have been documented in various contexts & denominations.
Cover-ups within the institution of the church refer to the deliberate efforts by religious leaders or authorities to conceal or downplay instances of misconduct, abuse, or wrongdoing within the church community. These cover-ups often involve minimizing or denying allegations, protecting perpetrators, silencing victims, and avoiding accountability or legal repercussions.
In many cases, church leaders may prioritize protecting the reputation and image of the institution over addressing the harm caused to individuals who have experienced abuse or misconduct. This can perpetuate a culture of secrecy, mistrust, and impunity within the church, allowing harmful behavior to continue unchecked and undermining the safety and well-being of congregants.
Cover-ups within the church can take various forms, including:
Concealing allegations of abuse or misconduct by clergy or church staff.
Transferring accused individuals to other congregations or positions within the church rather than reporting them to authorities.
Discrediting or intimidating victims who come forward with allegations.
Failing to implement proper protocols for preventing and responding to abuse, such as background checks or training programs.
Withholding information or misleading congregants and the public about the extent of abuse or misconduct within the church.
Key points to consider:
1️⃣Institutional Protection: In some cases, church leaders or institutions have been accused of prioritizing the protection of their reputation or the reputation of the church over addressing allegations of abuse. This can lead to efforts to conceal or minimize reports of abuse, rather than taking appropriate steps to investigate and address them.
2️⃣Failure to Report: In jurisdictions where clergy are mandated reporters of abuse, failure to report allegations of abuse to law enforcement authorities can constitute a form of cover-up. Church leaders who fail to report abuse may face legal consequences and can contribute to ongoing harm to victims and survivors.
3️⃣Impact on Victims: Cover-ups of abuse can have devastating consequences for victims and survivors, who may feel betrayed by trusted religious leaders and institutions. Failure to address abuse allegations can perpetuate cycles of harm and contribute to ongoing trauma and suffering.
4️⃣Lack of Transparency: Cover-ups of abuse often involve a lack of transparency and accountability within the church hierarchy. Victims and survivors may be discouraged or silenced from speaking out, and internal investigations may be conducted without appropriate oversight or impartiality.
Please 🎧 into this week’s podcast, where we explore my journey of disentangling from restrictive religious beliefs and rediscovering personal faith and autonomy!
Listen here! 🎧
These cover-ups can have devastating consequences for victims, perpetuating cycles of abuse, trauma, and disillusionment. They also erode trust in church leadership and contribute to broader societal concerns about institutional integrity and accountability.
Addressing cover-ups of abuse within the church requires a commitment to transparency, accountability, and justice. Church leaders and institutions must prioritize the safety and well-being of all members of their community and take decisive action to prevent and address abuse in all its forms.
🎙️ In this week’s podcast episode, we explore my journey of disentangling from restrictive religious beliefs and rediscovering personal faith and autonomy.
Listen here! 🎧
I want to emphasize the importance of critical thinking and personal agency in shaping one’s spiritual journey.
I believe by embracing curiosity, authenticity, and openness to new perspectives, I am inviting listeners to cultivate a deeper, more nuanced understanding of faith that is grounded in personal conviction and integrity.
This book has been truly incredible for me on my deconstruction journey. I mentioned it multiple times in this week’s episode. I cannot recommend it enough!
It serves as a beacon of support and empowerment for those of us who are navigating the complexities of disentanglement from restrictive religious beliefs. It offers validation, guidance, and solidarity to individuals who are embarking on this journey.
Taste0ftruth Tuesdays 