Exposing the Philosophical Roots of Modern Pseudoscience and Self-Help

Ever wondered where all those ‘self-help’ mantras and pseudoscientific health claims originated?

Today, we’re diving into the tangled web of modern pseudoscience and self-help nonsense, tracing its roots back to the 18th century. Join us as we explore the historical figures and movements that laid the groundwork for today’s self-help industry and pseudoscientific practices.

The Age of Enlightenment and the Dawn of Pseudoscience

Mesmer claimed that an invisible magnetic fluid flowed through all living things and that he could manipulate this fluid to heal people. His methods, often referred to as ‘mesmerism,’ involved elaborate rituals where he would pass his hands over patients or use magnetic rods, supposedly restoring the natural flow of this magnetic energy. The concepts of ‘balancing your energies’ or ‘unblocking your internal flows’ that are familiar in modern self-help and wellness circles can be traced back to Mesmer’s influence.

During the Age of Enlightenment, the scientific revolution was reshaping our understanding of the universe. However, medical practices were still lagging behind, relying on outdated treatments like leeching and bloodletting. Amidst this backdrop of scientific progress and societal change, Franz Mesmer, a charismatic physician from Vienna, introduced his controversial theory of ‘animal magnetism.’

The Debunking of Mesmerism

In 1784, a Royal Commission led by Benjamin Franklin and Antoine Lavoisier was established to investigate Mesmer’s claims. Through a series of experiments, they debunked the existence of the magnetic fluid, revealing that the observed effects were likely due to the power of suggestion and placebo rather than any real magnetic force. This investigation was pioneering in its use of controlled clinical trials and provided early insights into the placebo effect and modern hypnotism.

The Rise of Charismatic Faith Healing

Alexander Dowie emerged in the late 19th century with a different approach to healing. Dowie, a charismatic faith healer, conducted dramatic healing sessions where he would lay hands on the sick, claiming that divine power was responsible for their recovery. His dramatic pronouncements, such as ‘Be healed in the name of the Lord,’ exemplified his method.

However, Dowie’s methods, like those of other high-control groups and charismatic faith healers, often involved emotional manipulation to maintain control over their followers. The promise of miraculous healing or spiritual enlightenment could exploit vulnerable individuals, leading them to invest emotionally and financially in unproven methods.

The Influence of Phineas Quimby

Phineas Quimby, another influential figure of the 19th century, took a different approach. Quimby believed that the mind wielded incredible power over physical health and reality itself. His writings, which were published posthumously in 1921, propagated the notion that our thoughts could profoundly shape our lives. Quimby’s ideas significantly influenced the New Thought movement, which linked mind over matter with spiritual and mystical practices.

The Interplay of Occultism and New Thought

The New Thought movement was also intertwined with occultism and spiritism, which suggested that unseen spiritual forces could be harnessed to influence the material world. This blend of spiritual and pseudoscientific ideas contributed to the development of various modern self-help philosophies.

The Legacy in Modern Self-Help

Today, the legacy of these 19th-century ideas is evident in the booming self-help industry. Many contemporary ‘gurus’ draw on principles derived from Quimby’s teachings, promising that you can manifest your desires through positive thinking alone. However, it’s important to approach these claims with caution, as they can sometimes mask modern forms of manipulation, preying on individuals’ hopes and fears.

Modern Pseudoscience: German New Medicine and Joe Dispenza

Moving forward to more contemporary times, let’s examine some of the modern pseudoscientific claims making waves today.

German New Medicine (GNM): This theory, introduced by Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, posits that diseases are the result of unresolved psychological conflicts. While intriguing, GNM lacks solid scientific backing and is riddled with ethical and legal issues. Traditional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy, though challenging and not always successful, are grounded in extensive research. The frustration with their limitations often drives people towards alternative options, but not all alternatives are created equal.

Joe Dispenza: Known for his belief that the mind can heal the body, Dispenza’s ideas have gained popularity but often dip into pseudoscience. While there is some truth to the idea that mindset can influence well-being, it’s crucial to distinguish between positive thinking and unproven claims that can mislead vulnerable individuals.

Ancient Teachings and Their Modern Adaptations

The teachings of the Essenes, an ancient Jewish sect, offer another example of how historical ideas are repackaged for modern consumption. The Essenes believed in holistic healing and spirituality, and today, their practices are often marketed with a modern twist. While exploring the ‘lost teachings of the Essenes’ can be fascinating, it’s important to differentiate between genuine historical practices and modern marketing spin.

The Dangers of Mysticism and Extreme Practices

Mysticism sometimes promotes the idea that transcending physical needs through spiritual practices can lead to enlightenment. However, this can be extremely risky. Extreme fasting and other practices can cause nutritional deficiencies, severe malnutrition, and even mental health issues such as delusions and eating disorders.

Navigating the Fine Line Between Healing and Harm

Despite the lack of scientific proof, pseudoscientific ideas remain appealing, especially when traditional treatments fall short. Approach such claims with a critical mind and seek evidence-based practices. Knowledge is power, and staying informed is the best way to navigate health and wellness.

Critical Evaluation of Self-Help Claims

Common Themes:

  • 1. Misuse of Scientific Concepts: All three exploit complex ideas—quantum physics for Dispenza and GNM, and mystical ancient wisdom for the Essenes—to lend credibility to their claims.
  • 2. Lack of Scientific Evidence: None of these approaches are supported by credible scientific research, often relying on anecdotal evidence or misinterpretations of scientific principles.
  • 3. Potential Harm: By promoting unproven methods as alternatives to evidence-based medical treatments, they can lead individuals to make dangerous health choices.

While some people find inspiration in these teachings, it’s crucial to remember their origins and critically evaluate their claims. Just because something sounds empowering doesn’t mean it’s based on solid evidence.

Stay informed and be cautious of the fine line between genuine self-improvement and pseudoscientific hype. Thank you for reading!

Mesmerising Science: The Franklin Commission and the Modern Clinical Trial — The Public Domain Review

Mesmer-and-the-Rise-and-Fall-of-Animal-Magnetism.pdf (academia.dk)

Franklin, Lavoisier, and Mesmer: origin of the controlled clinical trial – PubMed (nih.gov)

The Sketchy Faith Healer Who Tried to Save New York From Vice – Atlas Obscura

Testimonies of former employees of Hamer – Psiram

Administrative Court of Sigmaringen, 17.12.1986 – Judgment in the Administrative litigation Hamer % University of Tübingen (archive.org)

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-67227-0_8

https://water.lsbu.ac.uk/water/memory_of_water.html

The German New Medicine a new Natural Science” by Professor Dr. Hans Ulrich Niemitz

Germanic New Medicine – Psiram

Victims of New Medicine – Psiram

The “Iron Rule of Cancer”: The dangerous cancer quackery that is the “German New Medicine” | Science-Based Medicine (sciencebasedmedicine.org)

Laws of biology: why so few? – PMC (nih.gov)

For those wanting to learn about the dangers of mysticism, pseudoscience, and the importance of proper nutrition, here are some solid resources:

Books

  1. “Bad Science” by Ben Goldacre: This book critically examines the misuse of science in various fields, including health and wellness, and debunks common pseudoscientific claims.
  2. “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark” by Carl Sagan: Sagan’s classic work promotes scientific skepticism and critical thinking, essential for understanding and debunking pseudoscientific beliefs.
  3. “Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine” by Simon Singh and Edzard Ernst: This book provides a thorough analysis of various alternative medicine practices, including the evidence (or lack thereof) supporting them.

Websites and Online Resources

  1. Quackwatch (quackwatch.org): A comprehensive resource for information on health frauds, myths, fads, and fallacies in the medical field.
  2. Science-Based Medicine (sciencebasedmedicine.org): A blog dedicated to evaluating medical treatments and products from a scientific perspective.
  3. Nutritional Resources from Mayo Clinic (mayoclinic.org): Provides evidence-based information on nutrition, diet, and healthy living.

Academic Journals and Articles

  1. PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov): A free search engine accessing primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. It’s an excellent resource for finding peer-reviewed studies on nutrition, health, and pseudoscience.
  2. “Nutrition” Journal (journals.elsevier.com/nutrition): Publishes peer-reviewed research articles on nutrition science.

Educational Videos and Courses

  1. TED Talks on Nutrition and Health: Various experts provide insights into the latest research and practical advice on maintaining a healthy lifestyle.
  2. Coursera and edX: These platforms offer courses from universities on nutrition, health sciences, and critical thinking skills.

Podcasts

  1. “Science Vs” by Wendy Zukerman: This podcast looks at what’s fact and what’s not in popular science topics, including health and wellness.
  2. “Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe”: A weekly science podcast discussing critical thinking, science, and pseudoscience.

By exploring these resources, individuals can gain a deeper understanding of the risks associated with mysticism and pseudoscientific beliefs, as well as the importance of evidence-based practices in health and nutrition.

Empower Your Healing Journey: The Diabolical Trinity Book Review

🌟 Book Review Alert! 🌟 This week’s podcast guest, Dr. Mark Gregory Karris, dives deep into religious trauma with his eye-opening book, “The Diabolical Trinity: Healing Religious Trauma from Original Sin, a Wrathful God, and Tormenting Hell.” 📚✨

Struggling with the remnants of religious fear and guilt? Dr. Karris’s insights are a game-changer. Swipe ➡️ to uncover why this book is a must-read for anyone on a healing journey.

Don’t miss our discussion on the podcast—catch up now before the next episode drops! 🎧💬

Tune in, transform, and take back your peace. 🙌

Listen here! 🎧

Dr. Mark Gregory Karris’s “The Diabolical Trinity: Healing Religious Trauma from a Wrathful God, Tormenting Hell, and Sinful Self” is a groundbreaking exploration of the psychological and emotional toll of harmful religious doctrines. Drawing from his extensive experience as a licensed therapist and ordained pastor, Karris skillfully dissects the “Diabolical Trinity”—the doctrines of a wrathful God, eternal torment in hell, and pervasive self-condemnation.

A Fresh Perspective on Religious Trauma

Dr. Mark’s has a compassionate and insightful approach to a topic often shrouded in silence and stigma. His work is praised for providing a fresh perspective on religious trauma, moving beyond mere critique to offer tangible steps toward healing. Karris’s ability to blend scholarly rigor with heartfelt empathy makes the book accessible to both academic and general audiences.

Empowering & Transformative

One of the most celebrated aspects of “The Diabolical Trinity” is Karris’s focus on empowerment. Critics have highlighted how the book not only identifies the sources of trauma but also provides practical tools for recovery. Karris’s therapeutic techniques and exercises are designed to help readers reclaim their sense of self-worth and foster a healthier, more compassionate spiritual outlook.

Critique & Redemption

While Karris does not shy away from critiquing harmful religious doctrines, he does so with a redemptive vision. He challenges readers to rethink their understanding of God, hell, and sin, offering an alternative that is both theologically sound and psychologically healing. This balanced approach has been particularly praised by critics who value both the deconstruction and reconstruction of faith.

Engaging & Accessible

The book’s engaging narrative style has also been a point of praise. Karris weaves personal anecdotes with clinical case studies, creating a compelling and relatable read. His clear and concise writing ensures that complex theological and psychological concepts are easily understood, making the book suitable for a wide audience.

Conclusion

In “The Diabolical Trinity,” Dr. Mark Gregory Karris offers a powerful and necessary contribution to the conversation on religious trauma. His work stands out for its depth of insight, practical guidance, and hopeful vision for healing. For anyone grappling with the damaging effects of rigid religious doctrines, this book provides a beacon of light and a path toward wholeness.

Religion, Emotion Suppression & Emotional Health

Anger itself isn’t fundamentally a sin; it’s a normal human emotion. However, as many of you know, I experienced spiritual abuse through ACBC Biblical counseling, also known as Nouthetic Counseling. This form of counseling, frequently used by the high-control religion I was part of, often employs various tactics to manipulate individuals into suppressing their anger.

High control religions often manipulate individuals against feeling anger by employing several tactics:
1. **Guilt and Shame**: They teach that anger is sinful or a sign of personal weakness, inducing guilt and shame in individuals who feel it.

2. **Doctrine and Indoctrination**: They emphasize doctrines that label anger as negative or spiritually harmful, encouraging followers to suppress it.

3. **Surveillance and Confession**: Constant surveillance and confession practices make individuals self-police their emotions, including anger.

4. **Isolation**: Isolating individuals from outside influences that might validate their feelings, keeping them within an echo chamber that reinforces the group’s views.

5. **Emotional Suppression**: Promoting emotional suppression as a virtue, advocating for calmness and forgiveness in all situations, often to the detriment of the individual’s mental health. 

These methods can deeply impact personal autonomy and emotional well-being, making it difficult for individuals to express or even recognize their anger.

In many religious and philosophical traditions, it’s acknowledged that feeling anger is a normal part of human experience. What can make anger sinful or morally problematic is how one responds to it and the actions it provokes.

The philosopher Aristotle described anger as a passion that, when experienced and expressed appropriately, can be virtuous.

The key is to be angry for the right reasons and in the right way.

Anger is understood as a normal emotional response to perceived threats or injustices. It’s part of the body’s natural fight-or-flight response and can be constructive when it motivates problem-solving and assertiveness.

Yet, High control religions often manipulate feelings of anger by framing them as sinful or spiritually harmful. They may discourage members from expressing anger or dissent, promoting instead the idea of forgiveness and submission to authority. Additionally, they may use guilt or shame to suppress anger, portraying it as a sign of weakness or lack of faith.

In extreme cases, anger may be labeled as a tool of the devil or a hindrance to spiritual growth, further reinforcing control over members’ emotions.

Suppressing anger can lead to negative health effects and mental distress, while constructive expression of anger can lead to positive change and resolution of conflicts.

Gender Roles & Expectations

  • Boys: Anger is often viewed as a more acceptable and natural response. They are frequently socialized to see anger as a sign of strength or assertiveness.

This can lead to a normalization of more aggressive behaviors and a lack of encouragement to explore other emotional responses.

  • Girls: In contrast, girls are often discouraged from expressing anger and are instead encouraged to use “nicer voices” or to remain calm and composed.

This reinforces traditional gender roles that value submissiveness, agreeableness, and emotional labor from women.

  • From a young age, girls are socialized to prioritize the needs of others and maintain harmony in relationships. Being assertive or expressing anger can be seen as disruptive to these social expectations.
  • Boys, on the other hand, might not receive the same level of guidance on emotional regulation, particularly concerning emotions like vulnerability or sadness, which are often socially discouraged in males.
  • From a young age, girls are socialized to prioritize the needs of others and maintain harmony in relationships. Being assertive or expressing anger can be seen as disruptive to these social expectations.
  • Boys, on the other hand, might not receive the same level of guidance on emotional regulation, particularly concerning emotions like vulnerability or sadness, which are often socially discouraged in males.

Long-term Consequences:

The reinforcement of these gender roles can perpetuate a cycle where men and women struggle with different aspects of emotional health. Men might face challenges in expressing vulnerability, while women might struggle with assertiveness and setting boundaries.

In professional and personal relationships, these dynamics can lead to power imbalances and communication issues, affecting everything from career advancement to personal satisfaction.

The way anger and other emotions are socially regulated based on gender reinforces traditional gender roles and affects the emotional development of individuals.

Recognizing and addressing these biases can lead to healthier emotional expressions and relationships for both men and women.

Sources:

Fierce Self compassion by Kristin Neff, PhD

Survey of Communication Study/Chapter 13 – Gender Communication – Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Exploring how religion suppresses emotions involves examining religious teachings, cultural practices, and the interpretation of sacred texts. Here are some resources that delve into this topic from various perspectives:

Books:

  1. “The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love” by bell hooks
    • This book discusses how cultural norms, often influenced by religious teachings, shape the emotional lives of men, encouraging the suppression of vulnerability and emotional expression.
  2. “Emotion and Religion: A Critical Assessment and Annotated Bibliography” by John Corrigan
    • This comprehensive work explores the complex relationship between emotion and religion, providing both theoretical discussions and annotated references for further research.
  3. “Holy Tears: Weeping in the Religious Imagination” edited by Kimberley Christine Patton and John Stratton Hawley
    • This collection of essays examines the role of tears and emotional expression in various religious traditions, offering insights into how certain emotions are both encouraged and suppressed.
  4. “The Varieties of Religious Experience” by William James
    • Although an older text, James’ exploration of religious experiences includes discussions on how different religions view and handle emotions, including suppression.

Articles:

  1. “Emotion Regulation in Religious Contexts” by Edward R. Canda in the Journal of Religion and Health
    • This article examines how religious contexts influence emotional regulation, including both the suppression and expression of emotions.
  2. “Religious Influences on Emotion Regulation” by Richard S. Lazarus in the book “Handbook of Emotions”
    • This chapter discusses how different religious traditions guide the regulation of emotions, often promoting certain emotions while suppressing others.
  3. “Religiosity and Emotion Regulation” by Charlotte van Schie and Michiel van Elk in Frontiers in Psychology
    • This research article explores how religiosity influences emotional regulation strategies, including suppression.

Academic Papers and Theses:

  1. “Emotion Suppression in Religion: A Study of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim Communities”
    • This thesis (or dissertation) might be found through university libraries and explores how different religious communities approach emotion suppression.
  2. “The Role of Religion in Emotion Regulation: Insights from a Psychological Perspective” by Kevin L. Ladd and Bernard Spilka in the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
    • This paper provides a psychological perspective on how religious beliefs and practices affect emotional regulation, including suppression.

Online Resources:

  1. Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life
    • Pew Research often publishes studies and reports on the intersection of religion and various aspects of life, including emotional health and expression.
  2. Psychology Today: Religion and Spirituality
    • This section of the Psychology Today website features articles on how religion impacts emotional well-being, including the suppression of emotions.
  3. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: “Emotion in Christian Philosophy”
    • This entry explores how Christian philosophy has historically viewed emotions and their expression or suppression.

These resources offer a broad overview of how different religious traditions and interpretations can influence the suppression of emotions. They provide insights from psychological, sociological, and theological perspectives.