Tag: Bible

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, faith, holistic health, JesusChrist, mental health, nervous system, newagetojesus, physiology, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Diabolical Trinity: Healing Religious Trauma from a Wrathful God, Tormenting Hell and Sinful Self

🌟 🎙️Welcome back, Get ready for a mind-expanding journey in this week’s episode! 🌟🎙️ We’re sitting down with Dr. Mark Gregory Karris to explore the twists and turns of his diverse professional journey and how it shapes his approach to tackling religious trauma.

 🎢 From deconstructing faith dynamics to navigating life after leaving religious traditions, Dr. Karris dishes out practical steps and deep insights like a pro. 📚 We dive into his latest book ‘Diabolical Trinity’ where he takes on the big questions—like transforming a wrathful God into a compassionate one and the impact of religious experiences on mental health. 🕊️ 

Join us as we uncover the power of community and holistic healing in this can’t-miss conversation! 🌈

Dr. Mark Karris is an experienced therapist with a rich and diverse background. He began his career working with adolescents and the severely mentally ill at Mental Health of Rockland County. In San Diego, he specialized in Emotionally Focused Couple’s Therapy under renowned mentors Kathryn de Bruin and Lisa Palmer Olson. He also spent three years in Japan, providing therapy on a military base and conducting international workshops for the Red Cross. He is now an adjunct professor at Point Loma Nazarene University. His educational background includes a Bachelor of Science in Psychology, a Master of Counseling, a Master of Divinity, and a PsyD with an emphasis in Marriage and Family Therapy.

Dr. Karris combines his extensive professional training with personal experiences of life’s ups and downs, making him uniquely equipped to guide his clients through their own journeys of healing and restoration.

He has authored several books that focus on topics related to spirituality, therapy, and personal growth. Some of his notable works include:

  1. “Divine Echoes: Reconciling Prayer with the Un-controlling Love of God” – This work explores the nature of prayer and God’s love, offering a fresh perspective on the power and purpose of prayer.
  2. “Season of Heartbreak: Healing for the Heart, Brain, and Soul” – In this book, Dr. Karris provides insights and strategies for healing from emotional and relational pain, drawing from his extensive experience as a therapist.
  3. “Diabolical Trinity: Healing Religious Trauma from a Wrathful God, Tormenting Hell and Sinful Self”

The interview begins with Dr. Mark sharing more about his own personal life and spiritual experiences that led him to be where he is today.

In his groundbreaking research, Dr. Mark Karris unveils the intricate layers of religious deconstruction through a lens of empathy and rigorous academic inquiry. His qualitative findings published in Clinical Pastoral Education challenge conventional evangelical narratives that attribute deconstruction solely to moral lapses or spiritual deception. Instead, Dr. Karris illuminates the diverse and often deeply personal reasons individuals undergo this transformative journey, shedding light on the complex interplay of faith, identity, and personal growth.

Here are some key insights from his study:

  1. Doctrinal and Theological Concerns: Many individuals experience faith deconstruction due to conflicts or doubts about core religious doctrines and beliefs. This can include questioning the validity of certain theological teachings or interpretations.
  2. Personal and Emotional Trauma: Religious trauma, stemming from negative experiences within religious contexts such as abuse, judgment, or oppression, often triggers a process of deconstruction as individuals seek healing and distance from harmful environments.
  3. Cultural and Social Factors: Changes in societal norms and cultural shifts can prompt individuals to reevaluate their religious beliefs and practices. This includes broader movements towards inclusivity, social justice, and equality that may conflict with traditional religious teachings.
  4. Intellectual Exploration: Increased access to diverse perspectives and information through the internet and education encourages critical thinking and exploration of alternative worldviews, leading to questioning of previously held religious beliefs.
  5. Existential and Spiritual Quests: Many people undergo faith deconstruction as part of a personal journey towards deeper existential meaning, spiritual growth, and authenticity. This involves exploring new spiritual paths or embracing a more flexible and inclusive understanding of spirituality.

Dr. Mark Karris’s shares a personal anecdote about encountering legalistic beliefs at a wedding highlights a broader issue within certain Christian traditions where behaviors are scrutinized through the lens of a wrathful God and the threat of hellfire. This theological framework often centers around doctrines like Original Sin, which have shaped Christian thought but are not universally accepted across all Christian denominations.

History and Evolution of Doctrine

1. Original Sin: The concept of Original Sin traces its roots to early Christian theologians such as Augustine of Hippo in the 5th century. Augustine argued that all humans inherit a sinful nature from Adam and Eve’s disobedience in the Garden of Eden, leading to a state of inherent moral corruption and separation from God.

2. Wrathful God: Throughout history, various Christian theologians and denominations have grappled with the portrayal of God as wrathful and vengeful, often emphasizing divine justice and punishment for sin. This perspective has been influential in shaping religious practices and beliefs, contributing to fears of divine judgment.

3. Hellfire and Eternal Damnation: The concept of hell as a place of eternal punishment for sinners is deeply embedded in Christian teachings, particularly in traditions emphasizing the consequences of disobedience to God’s will. This belief has profound psychological and emotional impacts, instilling fear and guilt among believers.

Critiques and Controversies

1. Cultural and Interpretive Differences: Not all Christian traditions adhere to the doctrines of Original Sin, a wrathful God, and eternal damnation in the same way. Some denominations interpret these concepts metaphorically or emphasize God’s love and mercy over punitive justice.

2. Psychological Effects: The emphasis on sin, guilt, and punishment can lead to harmful psychological effects, such as low self-esteem, anxiety, and religious trauma, especially when coupled with authoritarian interpretations that dictate strict moral codes and behaviors.

Diversity of Interpretations and Doctrines Within Christianity

Dr. Karris helps me challenge the claims of Clarity and Divine Truth. Here’s a breakdown of this issue:

  1. Diversity of Interpretations: The existence of over 45,000 Christian denominations worldwide reflects a wide range of doctrinal interpretations, from reformed traditions to Pentecostal beliefs. Each denomination asserts that their understanding of the Bible is correct and aligned with God’s truth. However, the diversity and sometimes contradictory nature of these interpretations suggest that clarity in biblical understanding is not as straightforward as proclaimed.
  2. Reasons for Diversity: The diversity in interpretations stems from a variety of factors:
    • Cultural and Historical Contexts: Different denominations interpret biblical texts through the lens of their cultural and historical contexts, which can lead to varied understandings.
    • Theological Emphases: Emphasis on different theological doctrines (such as salvation, baptism, worship practices) can shape how scriptures are interpreted.
    • Hermeneutical Approaches: Variations in interpretive methods (literal vs. allegorical, contextual vs. universal application) contribute to divergent doctrinal beliefs.
    • Human Fallibility: Interpretations are influenced by human limitations, biases, and subjective interpretations of scripture.
  3. Implications for Biblical Inerrancy and Infallibility: The existence of diverse and conflicting interpretations challenges the notions of biblical inerrancy (the belief that the Bible is without error in all matters) and infallibility (the belief that the Bible is incapable of error in matters of faith and practice). If the Bible were truly clear and unambiguous in its teachings, one might expect a greater consensus among denominations. However, the wide array of interpretations suggests that human understanding and cultural influences significantly shape biblical interpretation.
  4. Critical Assessment: Dr. Karris’s critique invites Christians to critically assess claims of absolute doctrinal clarity and instead recognize the complex and nuanced nature of biblical interpretation. It encourages humility in acknowledging the limitations of human understanding and the importance of dialogue and openness to diverse perspectives within Christian discourse.

The diversity of interpretations among Christian denominations challenges the notion of a singular, clear, and error-free interpretation of the Bible, thereby questioning traditional claims of biblical inerrancy and infallibility. Understanding and grappling with this diversity can foster deeper theological reflection and dialogue within the Christian community.

Navigating Anxiety in Fundamentalist Christian Circles During Deconstruction

People entrenched in fundamentalist sects of Christianity often experience heightened anxiety when they witness others going through a process of deconstruction. This reaction stems from their upbringing, where they were taught that deviation from established beliefs and practices is not only wrong but potentially dangerous. In fundamentalist environments, any departure from the accepted norms can be perceived as a threat to one’s faith, community, and even personal safety.

This anxiety is compounded by the fear that questioning or exploring alternative beliefs may lead to spiritual and moral peril. Fundamentalist teachings often instill a rigid worldview where conformity is equated with spiritual safety, and deviation is seen as a sign of weakness or susceptibility to worldly influences.

Moreover, the concept of narcissistic rage can be observed in some cases, where individuals deeply embedded in fundamentalist ideologies react with hostility or aggression towards those who challenge or question their beliefs. This reaction is different from a healthy spiritual practice, which encourages openness, curiosity, and respectful dialogue about different perspectives.

Navigating these dynamics requires empathy and understanding from both sides. Those undergoing deconstruction seek to reconcile their evolving beliefs with their personal experiences and spiritual growth, while those in fundamentalist circles may benefit from recognizing that diversity of belief does not necessarily threaten their own faith or spiritual well-being. Here’s how this dynamic unfolds:

  1. Fear of Deviation: Fundamentalist teachings often emphasize a strict adherence to doctrinal purity and established beliefs. Any questioning or deviation from these beliefs is viewed as a threat to faith and spiritual safety.
  2. Cognitive Dissonance: Witnessing others deconstructing their faith can trigger cognitive dissonance among fundamentalists. It challenges their worldview and belief system, leading to discomfort and anxiety.
  3. Fear of Consequences: Fundamentalist teachings may instill fear regarding the consequences of exploring different beliefs or questioning established doctrines. There’s a pervasive belief that straying from the accepted path could lead to spiritual peril or loss of salvation.
  4. Sense of Identity Threat: For individuals deeply embedded in fundamentalist communities, their identity and sense of belonging are closely tied to doctrinal conformity. Deconstruction challenges this identity, causing emotional distress and anxiety.
  5. Social Pressure: Fundamentalist communities often exert strong social pressure to conform to group norms and beliefs. The prospect of others deconstructing their faith can create social anxiety and a fear of ostracization or judgment from peers and leaders.

In essence, the anxiety experienced by individuals in fundamentalist sects when encountering deconstruction reflects deep-seated beliefs and teachings that equate divergence from established doctrines with spiritual peril. This anxiety underscores the psychological and emotional challenges inherent in questioning and evolving one’s faith within such contexts. Encouraging open dialogue and mutual respect can foster a healthier approach to spiritual exploration and community dynamics.

Challenges Faced by Religious Refugees

In his book Religious Refugees, Dr. Mark Gregory Karris explores the profound journey of individuals who have chosen to leave behind their religious traditions. He examines the challenges faced by these “religious refugees,” which include:

  1. Loss of Community and Identity: Leaving a religious tradition often means departing from a community that has provided identity, belonging, and social support. This loss can lead to feelings of isolation and disorientation.
  2. Existential Uncertainty: Departing from familiar religious beliefs can provoke profound existential questions about purpose, meaning, and the nature of existence. This existential uncertainty can be unsettling and challenging to navigate.
  3. Family and Social Rejection: Religious refugees may face rejection or judgment from family members, friends, or broader social circles who adhere to the traditional religious beliefs from which they departed. This can strain relationships and create emotional distress.
  4. Psychological Impact: The process of leaving a religious tradition can evoke emotional turmoil, including guilt, fear, grief, and confusion. Individuals may grapple with reconciling their past beliefs with new perspectives.
  5. Navigating New Belief Systems: After leaving a religious tradition, individuals often embark on a journey of exploring new belief systems or philosophical frameworks. This process requires openness, intellectual curiosity, and a willingness to challenge prior assumptions.

“Another wave of rejection surfaced when people either shamed us for not being in church or stopped talking to us all together. It left me wondering whether I was truly accepted by God–his people surely weren’t making me feel that way, except when I did what they wanted me to do” -Karl Forehand Out into the Desert

I’ve often expressed that becoming a Christian is one of my biggest regrets due to the intense religious harm I experienced. From my perspective, deconstructing from Original Sin, a wrathful God and Eternal damnation have been the most impactful. This trinity consists of toxic theology, abusive practices, and authoritarian leadership. These elements work together to create environments that are spiritually and psychologically harmful.

Doctrines such as original sin & eternal damnation can instill fear and guilt, while abusive practices and authoritarian leadership stifle personal autonomy and foster dependency.

The combination of these factors can lead to profound emotional and spiritual damage, manifesting as Religious Trauma Syndrome (RTS).

  • Some symptoms of religious trauma include:
  • Compulsive perfectionism
  • Faith crisis or becoming disillusioned with spirituality
  • Self-hatred or compromised self-worth
  • Constant feelings of shame or guilt
  • Hypervigilance
  • A distinct lack of boundaries between personal life and religious

Religious trauma can cause, contribute to, or otherwise worsen mental health disorders, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety.

Some steps in the recovery process include:
1️⃣Finding a trusted confidant with whom you can be honest and share your feelings

2️⃣Psychodynamic therapy or counseling, where individuals can explore their past religious experiences, learn to express painful emotions, challenge ingrained beliefs, and develop healthier coping mechanisms.

In Conclusion

Modern theologians and Christian thinkers have proposed alternative interpretations of sin, emphasizing human dignity, moral responsibility, and the transformative power of grace. These perspectives aim to promote a more compassionate and inclusive understanding of faith that supports mental and emotional well-being.

Dr. Karris’s reflection on the intertwined doctrines of a wrathful God, Original Sin, and eternal punishment underscores the complexity and diversity within Christian theology. By questioning and critiquing these doctrines, he invites dialogue on how theological beliefs impact individuals’ spiritual journeys and mental health. Recognizing the historical context and evolving interpretations of these doctrines is essential for fostering a more compassionate and supportive religious environment that promotes healing and personal growth.

🙏 Please help this podcast reach a larger audience in hope to edify & encourage others! To do so: leave a 5⭐️ review and send it to a friend! Thank you for listening! I’d love to hear from you, find me on Instagram!⁠⁠⁠ @taste0ftruth⁠⁠⁠ or⁠⁠⁠ Pinterest! ⁠⁠ ⁠

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, holistic health, JesusChrist, newagetojesus, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Breaking Free from the Gospel Hamster Wheel

The painful realization that the faith I once shared with others has now become a source of suffering has been incredibly challenging. Evangelical and fundamentalist Christianity, with its focus on personal piety, end-times prophecy, and rigid scriptural interpretations, often feels like a “spiritual hamster wheel,” perpetuating feelings of inadequacy and burnout.

The Cycle of Inadequacy

Teachings on personal righteousness, like Matthew 5:48 (“Be perfect…”), set an unattainable standard, leading to chronic feelings of failure. This is reinforced in passages like 1 Peter 1:15-16 (“Be holy, because I am holy”) and James 2:10 (“Whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at one point is guilty of breaking all of it”). These verses, meant to call believers to holiness, often make them feel like they will never measure up.

The story of the rich young ruler (Matthew 19:21-22) illustrates how even seemingly righteous individuals can fall short of the high demands set by scripture. This feeds into a cycle where striving to meet these impossible standards is never enough, and feelings of inadequacy become deeply ingrained.

The Cost of Legalism and Hypocrisy

In legalistic communities, strict adherence to rules becomes a source of judgment, leading to comparison and spiritual inferiority. Jesus’ condemnation of the Pharisees in Matthew 23:27-28 highlights the dangers of focusing on external piety while neglecting true righteousness of the heart: “You are like whitewashed tombs…,” he says, criticizing those who appear righteous outwardly but are corrupt within.

This emphasis on outward perfection can lead to emotional exhaustion. For individuals struggling with mental health issues, this pressure only deepens feelings of anxiety, depression, and burnout. The pursuit of a “perfect” faith can overshadow the core message of grace and peace that Jesus promised (Matthew 11:28-30), offering rest rather than striving.

Fear of Judgment and the End Times

Another harmful aspect of fundamentalist teachings is the constant fear of divine judgment, especially tied to eschatological beliefs. Matthew 24:42-44 warns of the unknown time of Christ’s return, fostering anxiety about being unprepared. Similarly, Luke 21:34-36 urges constant vigilance, contributing to a heightened sense of urgency and fear, especially for those who feel uncertain about their salvation.

This fear of judgment, particularly the idea of being “left behind,” creates a perpetual state of spiritual striving. Even when believers try to live out their faith, they can never shake the fear that they may not be found worthy. This undermines the very peace that faith is supposed to bring.

The Hypocrisy Within These Communities

Another painful realization in these environments is the hypocrisy in handling sin and misconduct. High-profile scandals, such as those within the Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), often involve the forgiveness of abusers without meaningful accountability. This directly contradicts the message of justice and compassion that these faith traditions profess.

For example, Romans 3:23 (“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”) underlines that all humans are imperfect, but the gospel calls for reconciliation and redemption. Yet, when perpetrators of abuse are shielded by church leadership without real consequences, it deeply undermines the faith’s integrity and causes further disillusionment.

Legalism vs. Grace

The constant focus on legalism and rule-following rather than grace often leads to a misunderstanding of salvation. While Ephesians 2:8-9 reminds believers that salvation comes by grace through faith and not by works, many communities continue to push the idea that adherence to rules is a condition for God’s love.

This contradiction creates a mindset where believers feel their worth is based on their performance rather than God’s unconditional love. Romans 7:18-19 highlights Paul’s internal struggle: “For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing.” This battle between human imperfection and divine expectation becomes a source of constant anxiety, leaving no room for true peace.

Moving Forward: Seeking Peace Amidst the Chaos

From New Age spirituality to conservative evangelicalism, I was promised peace in Jesus, but what I found instead was a cycle of spiritual exhaustion and inadequacy. These inconsistencies reflect the tensions within scripture, where teachings on grace, salvation, and divine judgment can feel contradictory.

If you find yourself grappling with these issues, here are some resources that explore the complexities of faith and mental health from a broader perspective:

Books:

  • The Human Faces of God by Thom Stark
  • Misquoting Jesus by Bart D. Ehrman

Podcasts:

  • The Liturgists Podcast explores a variety of theological perspectives and deconstruction journeys.

Courses:

  • Coursera and edX offer free courses on biblical studies and theology from various universities worldwide, offering critical insights into scriptural interpretation.

Faith should provide rest, not burden. It’s time to confront the theological hamster wheel and find a path to authentic peace, rooted in grace, not perfection.

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, wordofgod

Rethinking Biblical Inerrancy: Challenging Harmful Beliefs

One of the most frustrating parts of my deconstruction journey was discovering that I had been misled about the Bible being the word of God.

The Bible isn’t as clear as many believe, and insisting on its authority can be damaging and harmful. Let’s rethink and question these teachings to foster healthier, more inclusive perspectives. 🌟📖 #Deconstruction #QuestionEverything

Biblical inerrancy is the doctrinal position that the Bible, in its original manuscripts, is without error or fault in all its teachings. This includes not only spiritual and moral teachings but also historical and factual assertions made in the text. Here are the key components of the doctrine:

  1. Without Error: The belief that the Scriptures, as originally written, are completely free from error in all that they affirm.
  2. Original Manuscripts: Inerrancy applies to the original manuscripts (autographs) of the biblical texts. Copies and translations may contain errors due to human transcription or translation processes.
  3. All Teachings: Inerrancy covers all aspects of the Bible, including theological, moral, historical, and scientific assertions made by the text.
  4. Divine Inspiration: The belief that the Bible is divinely inspired, meaning that God guided the human authors in such a way that their writings can be considered the Word of God.
  5. Authority of Scripture: The doctrine implies that the Bible is the ultimate authority for faith and practice, as it is believed to be the true and accurate Word of God.

The doctrine of biblical inerrancy, as formally articulated, was developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It was a response to modernist theology and biblical criticism. The key historical moments include:

  1. Princeton Theological Seminary: In the late 19th century, scholars at Princeton Theological Seminary, like B.B. Warfield and A.A. Hodge, were pivotal in defining and defending the doctrine of inerrancy. They emphasized the original manuscripts of the Bible as being without error.
  2. The Fundamentals: Published between 1910 and 1915, these essays were a series of writings by conservative theologians aiming to reaffirm traditional Christian beliefs, including the inerrancy of the Bible.
  3. Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy: In 1978, the doctrine was formally codified by evangelical leaders in the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, which declared that the Bible is without error in all its teachings.

While the concept that the Bible is divinely inspired and authoritative has been a long-standing belief in Christianity, the specific articulation of “inerrancy” as we understand it today is relatively recent, emerging primarily in the context of responses to higher biblical criticism and theological modernism.

The doctrine of biblical inerrancy is considered false and harmful by various scholars, theologians, and critics for several reasons:

False Claims of Inerrancy

  1. Manuscript Variations: There are thousands of ancient manuscripts of the Bible, and none of them are exactly alike. These textual variations show that errors and changes were introduced over time.
  2. Historical and Scientific Errors: The Bible contains numerous statements that conflict with established historical and scientific knowledge, such as the creation account in Genesis or historical timelines that do not align with archaeological findings.
  3. Contradictions: The Bible includes various contradictions and inconsistencies within its texts, such as differing accounts of the same events in the Gospels.
  4. Human Authorship: The Bible was written by numerous human authors over centuries, each with their own cultural, historical, and personal influences, which introduces the possibility of human error.

Harmful Effects of Inerrancy

  1. Suppression of Inquiry: The belief in inerrancy can stifle intellectual and theological exploration, discouraging believers from asking questions or seeking understanding beyond the literal interpretation of the text.
  2. Justification of Harmful Practices: Inerrant readings of the Bible have been used to justify slavery, misogyny, homophobia, and other forms of discrimination and oppression.
  3. Cognitive Dissonance: Believers may experience cognitive dissonance when confronted with evidence that contradicts an inerrant view of the Bible, leading to emotional and psychological distress.
  4. Polarization: The insistence on inerrancy can create divisions within religious communities and between religious and secular communities, as it often leads to a rigid, uncompromising stance on various social and ethical issues.
  5. Moral Absolutism: Inerrancy can promote a black-and-white view of morality, where complex ethical issues are oversimplified, leading to judgmental attitudes and a lack of empathy.

Theological and Ethical Concerns

  1. Idolatry of the Text: Placing the Bible as an inerrant authority can lead to bibliolatry, where the text itself is worshipped rather than the divine principles it is supposed to convey.
  2. Disregard for Context: Inerrant views often ignore the historical and cultural contexts of the biblical texts, leading to misinterpretations and misapplications of its teachings.
  3. Undermining the Spirit of the Message: Focusing on inerrancy can overshadow the core messages of love, justice, and compassion that many believe are the true essence of the Bible’s teachings.

Scholarly Criticism

  1. Historical-Critical Method: Scholars using historical-critical methods have shown that the Bible should be understood in its historical context, recognizing the human elements of its composition.
  2. Theological Pluralism: Many theologians argue for a more nuanced view of the Bible, seeing it as a document that reflects the evolving understanding of God and morality by different communities over time.

Realizing that The Bible is not God’s word or God’s voice is crucial for a more peaceful society moving forward. The more holistic belief that it’s a collection of writings by the Israelites and early Christians that reflect their interpretations and understandings of God’s actions and teachings.

These texts capture their experiences, beliefs, and cultural context, offering a human perspective on the divine.

Believing the Bible is univocal and inerrant can stifle critical thinking and foster intolerance. Let’s embrace diverse interpretations and promote understanding. 💡

📚 Both the Old and New Testaments are seen by many scholars as records of human efforts to understand and communicate divine revelations.

Recognizing the Bible as fallible is important for several reasons:

1️⃣Encourages Critical Thinking: It allows for a more nuanced and critical approach to reading and interpreting the texts, encouraging believers to engage with the Bible thoughtfully and contextually.

2️⃣Promotes Historical and Cultural Understanding: Understanding the Bible as a product of its time and culture helps in appreciating its historical context and the perspectives of its authors.

3️⃣Prevents Misuse: It reduces the likelihood of using the Bible to justify harmful actions or beliefs, as it acknowledges the human element in its writings.

4️⃣Facilitates Interfaith Dialogue: Accepting the Bible’s fallibility can foster more open and respectful conversations with those of other faiths or beliefs, promoting mutual understanding.

5️⃣Supports Spiritual Growth: It encourages individuals to seek a deeper, more personal relationship with the divine, rather than relying solely on the text as an unquestionable authority.

Understanding that the Bible is not the literal word of God but rather interpretations of God’s word can help people grasp the complexities and nuances of their faith in several ways:

1. **Historical Context**: Recognizing that the Bible was written over centuries by different authors in various historical and cultural contexts can deepen one’s understanding of the scriptures. This perspective encourages studying the historical background, societal norms, and cultural influences of the time, leading to a more informed and nuanced interpretation of biblical texts.

2. **Human Element**: Acknowledging the human role in writing and compiling the Bible highlights the diverse perspectives and experiences of its authors. This can help believers appreciate the richness and diversity within the scriptures and understand that the Bible reflects a range of human encounters with the divine.

3. **Interpretive Flexibility**: Seeing the Bible as an interpretation rather than the literal word allows for a more flexible approach to understanding its teachings. This can open up space for dialogue and differing interpretations, making the scriptures more accessible and relevant to contemporary issues and diverse cultural contexts.

4. **Focus on Core Principles**: This perspective can shift the focus from literal interpretations of specific verses to the core principles and overarching messages of love, justice, mercy, and faithfulness. It encourages believers to seek the essence of God’s message and how it applies to their lives today.

5. **Encouragement of Critical Thinking**: Viewing the Bible as interpretative literature can encourage critical thinking and personal engagement with the text. Believers may feel more empowered to question, explore, and seek deeper understanding rather than accepting interpretations uncritically.

6. **Reconciliation of Science and Faith**: This understanding can help reconcile scientific knowledge and faith. By recognizing that the Bible’s creation stories, for instance, are theological narratives rather than scientific accounts, believers can appreciate both the spiritual truths and scientific explanations of the natural world.

7. **Promotion of Compassion and Tolerance**: Realizing that interpretations can vary fosters a more compassionate and tolerant attitude toward those with different beliefs or interpretations. It can reduce dogmatism and promote a more inclusive and understanding faith community.

8. **Personal Relationship with God**: It emphasizes the importance of personal relationship and direct experience with God. Instead of relying solely on scripture as the intermediary, believers are encouraged to seek God through prayer, reflection, and spiritual practices, allowing for a more intimate and dynamic faith experience.

By viewing the Bible as a profound yet human endeavor to understand and communicate God’s message, believers can engage with it in a way that is thoughtful, respectful, and deeply personal, enhancing their spiritual growth and understanding of the divine.

#facethefacts#FaithAndReason#OpenMind#spiritualgrowth#deconstruction#biblicaltruth#theology#scripture#culteducation#fundamentalist

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, mental health, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Understanding Fundamentalism: Rigid Beliefs, Division, and Psychological Impact

Fundamentalism refers to a strict adherence to specific theological doctrines typically characterized by a literal interpretation of religious texts. This approach often emphasizes the necessity of returning to the “fundamentals” or original beliefs and practices of a religion. It commonly arises as a reaction against modernist and secular influences perceived to undermine traditional religious values.

Gravitating towards fundamentalism after experiencing hyper-charismatic or new age movements can seem understandable. The strict rules and structure provide a perceived sense of safety. Particularly during times of stress and uncertainty, we can gravitate towards the need for a sense of control & structure. However, this rigidity and extreme control often lead to increased trauma over time.

As I deconstruct from the Christian faith, I am re-evaluating beliefs, questioning long-held doctrines, and confronting the challenges faced within spiritually abusive environments. 

Key features of fundamentalism include:

  • Literalism: Fundamentalists often interpret Scripture texts in a literal or strict manner
  • Inerrancy: Fundamentalists typically uphold the belief in the inerrancy or infallibility of the Bible, viewing them as the ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice. Aka Biblicists
  • Separatism: Fundamentalist movements may advocate for the separation of believers from secular society or from other religious groups deemed to be impure or heretical.
  • Moral Conservatism: Fundamentalists often promote traditional moral values and social norms, opposing practices or lifestyles they perceive as contrary to their religious beliefs.
  • Resistance to Change: Fundamentalists are often resistant to change and innovation within religious doctrine or practice, viewing such developments as departures from true faith.
  • Intolerance: Fundamentalist groups may exhibit intolerance towards individuals or groups who hold different beliefs or lifestyles, leading to discrimination, ostracism, or even violence towards perceived “outsiders” or “heretics.”
  • Dogmatism: Fundamentalist ideology tends to promote rigid, inflexible interpretations of religious or ideological principles, discouraging questioning or exploration of alternative viewpoints.
  • Anti-intellectualism: Critics argue that fundamentalism can foster distrust or rejection of scientific knowledge, critical thinking, and scholarly inquiry, leading to a rejection of evidence-based reasoning and a preference for simplistic, black-and-white thinking

Potential Dangers to Society:

  1. Intolerance and Division:
    • Fundamentalist ideologies often promote an “us versus them” mentality, leading to increased intolerance and division within society. This can result in discrimination against those who do not share the same beliefs​ (Harvard Book Store)​.
  2. Suppression of Dissent:
    • In fundamentalist communities, questioning or deviating from established doctrines is often discouraged or outright condemned, suppressing intellectual freedom and critical thinking​ (Harvard Book Store)​​ (Barnes & Noble)​.
  3. Extremism and Violence:
    • Fundamentalist beliefs can sometimes justify extreme actions, including violence, against those perceived as threats to their worldview. This can lead to acts of terrorism or other forms of conflict and aggression​ (Harvard University Press)​​ (Barnes & Noble)​.
  4. Impact on Individual Rights:
    • Fundamentalism often imposes strict moral codes that can infringe on individual rights, particularly affecting women and minorities. Practices such as gender segregation, limitations on freedom of expression, and enforcement of strict behavioral norms are common​ (Barnes & Noble)​​ (Harvard Book Store)​.
  5. Resistance to Progress and Change:
    • Fundamentalist groups frequently resist scientific, social, and cultural advancements, hindering progress in areas such as education, healthcare, and human rights. This resistance can have broad negative impacts on societal development​ (Harvard Book Store)​.

Fundamentalism’s rigid adherence to traditional beliefs and practices can create significant challenges, fostering environments that can stifle personal freedom, promote division, and sometimes lead to conflict and violence.

Here are some resources that discuss the dangers of fundamentalism from various perspectives, including academic research, books, and articles:

Books

  1. “The Fundamentalist Mindset: Psychological Perspectives on Religion, Violence, and History” by Charles B. Strozier, David M. Terman, and James W. Jones
    • This book provides a psychological analysis of the fundamentalist mindset, exploring how it can lead to intolerance, aggression, and violence.
  2. “Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning” by Malise Ruthven
    • Ruthven examines the roots of fundamentalism in various religions and its socio-political impact, highlighting how it can lead to social fragmentation and conflict.
  3. “The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism” by Karen Armstrong
    • Armstrong traces the history of fundamentalist movements in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, and discusses their impact on modern society, emphasizing the dangers of dogmatic thinking and resistance to change.

Articles

  1. “The Dangers of Fundamentalism” by Andrew Sullivan (New York Magazine)
    • This article discusses the social and political dangers of religious fundamentalism, particularly its impact on democracy and individual freedoms. Read here.
  2. “The Psychology of Religious Fundamentalism” by Ralph W. Hood Jr., Peter C. Hill, and W. Paul Williamson (Guilford Press)
    • This article explores the psychological mechanisms behind religious fundamentalism and its potential to foster rigid, intolerant, and sometimes violent behavior.
  3. “Fundamentalism and the Control of Women” by Patricia Hill Collins (Journal of Women’s History)
    • Collins discusses how fundamentalist ideologies often lead to the suppression of women’s rights and freedoms, impacting gender equality and social justice.

Academic Papers

  1. “Religious Fundamentalism and Its Impact on Democracy” by Mark Juergensmeyer (Journal of Democracy)
    • This paper explores how fundamentalist movements challenge democratic values and institutions, posing a threat to pluralism and civil liberties. Read here.
  2. “Fundamentalism and the Paradox of Modernity” by Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby (American Academy of Arts and Sciences)
    • The authors analyze the paradoxical relationship between fundamentalist movements and modernity, highlighting the resistance to modern values and the implications for societal progress. Read here.
  3. “The Social Psychology of Religious Fundamentalism” by Roy F. Baumeister, Laura Smart, and Joseph M. Boden (Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion)
    • This paper examines the social psychological aspects of religious fundamentalism, including its impact on group cohesion and intergroup conflict. Read here.

Online Resources

  1. Pew Research Center: Religion & Public Life
    • Pew provides numerous reports and articles on the impact of religious fundamentalism on society, politics, and culture. Visit Pew Research.
  2. BBC: What is Religious Fundamentalism?
    • A concise overview of religious fundamentalism, its characteristics, and its potential dangers to global security and social harmony. Read here.

These resources provide comprehensive insights into the dangers of fundamentalism, illustrating its potential to foster intolerance, social division, and conflict.

 #Deconstruction #SpiritualJourney #Faith #ReligiousTrauma #Authenticity

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, JesusChrist, mental health, nervous system, physiology, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview

From Conspiracy to Cult–How I was recruited into high control religion.

Hey hey Truth seekers! Welcome back to Taste of Truth Tuesdays. It’s Megan Leigh here, your host, and today we’re mixing up our usual bite-sized conversations on fitness, nutrition, mindset, and spirituality with something a little different. Buckle up, because we’re diving headfirst into the fascinating (and sometimes unsettling) world of end-times obsession and its connection to conspiracy theories.

This season, we’re all about unpacking trends, debunking myths, and delivering practical tips for living a healthier, more balanced life. But today, we’re taking a detour. Have you ever found yourself tumbling down the rabbit hole of radical ideologies or swept up in the fervor of religious conversion? If so, you’re not alone. In fact, during the pandemic, I saw firsthand how deeply conspiracies and religious movements can intertwine, drawing people in with promises of belonging, purpose, and empowerment.

Picture this: it’s the height of the pandemic. Isolation, uncertainty, and fear are at an all-time high. Suddenly, conspiracy theories start to feel less like fringe ideas and more like a secret society offering answers and clarity. For many, including myself, this seductive pull can lead straight into the arms of cult-like dynamics. Let’s rewind a bit so I can share my journey.

Read more here: https://taste0ftruth.com/2024/07/10/the-crunchy-to-alt-right-pipeline-from-wellness-to-extremism/

From 2016 to 2020, I was caught in the grip of multi-level marketing (MLM) schemes. You know the ones—alluring promises of financial freedom and community, flashy products that claim to change your life but often come with unrealistic body standards and toxic relationships with food. At the time, I was searching for connection and a sense of control, but instead, I found myself hooked like a fish on a line, reeled into a world that felt more like a trap the deeper I went.

Now it’s 2020, the beginning of the pandemic, and I found myself knee-deep in conspiracy theories faster than you can say “tin foil hat.” Before I knew it, I was lured into the clutches of a high-control religion, complete with charismatic leaders and an intense “us versus them” mentality. Are you buckled up, folks? Good, because we’re about to embark on a wild ride through the intriguing world of religious prophecy, biblical interpretations, and the end-times obsession that has everyone talking.

Imagine modern American culture—a melting pot of beliefs and ideologies—stirred up with a hefty dose of religious prophecy. For centuries, Christians have been captivated by the idea of the apocalypse, with theological discussions diving deep into the mysterious realms of biblical prophecy. But hold onto your hats, because things have kicked into high gear in recent times. By “recent,” I mean the last 100-200 years. Evangelical Christians, in particular, have cranked their confidence levels to 11, interpreting every hiccup in current events as a surefire sign that the end is near.

Let’s rewind a little to the 19th century. This was a time of upheaval and change, where discoveries in science and historical criticism were turning the world on its head. This era sparked a renewed fervor for interpreting religious texts through a literal lens—a trend that still echoes today. Critics of the literal hermeneutic argue that it can be overly simplistic and fails to account for the complexities and nuances of ancient texts. They contend that a purely literal interpretation can overlook metaphorical or symbolic meanings, cultural contexts, and the evolving nature of language over time. Additionally, critics suggest that such an approach may lead to fundamentalism and rigid dogmatism rather than a deeper understanding of the text.

The lie of Biblical Inerrancy

And let’s not forget about the false doctrine of biblical inerrancy, another shiny new invention from the 19th century. Rogers and McKim argued that the Princeton theologians of the 19th and early 20th centuries, most notably B.B. Warfield, created the doctrine of inerrancy, which teaches that the Bible is entirely without error in all that it affirms. This little gem teaches that the Bible is without error—a claim that’s got more holes than a block of Swiss cheese. By focusing so heavily on inerrancy, proponents often miss the deeper, more nuanced messages these texts are trying to convey. 🚩🚩Read my blog: Rethinking biblical inerrancy.

Since the publication of C.I. Scofield’s edition of the King James Version in 1909, premillennial dispensationalism came to dominate evangelical thought. Premillennial Dispensationalism is a Christian theological perspective that combines premillennialism with dispensationalism. Here’s a breakdown of the components:

Premillennialism: This is the belief that Jesus Christ will return to Earth before (pre-) a thousand-year period of peace and righteousness known as the Millennium. According to premillennialists, the Second Coming of Christ will precede this millennial reign, during which Christ will physically rule on Earth.

Dispensationalism: This is a framework for interpreting the Bible that divides history into distinct periods or “dispensations.” Each dispensation is seen as a specific way in which God interacts with humanity. Dispensationalists typically identify seven such periods, ranging from the time of innocence in the Garden of Eden to the millennial kingdom and beyond.

When combined, Premillennial Dispensationalism holds that:

  • We are currently living in a dispensation known as the “Church Age,” which will end with the rapture of the church, where believers are taken up to meet Christ in the air.
  • This event will be followed by a seven-year period of tribulation, characterized by widespread suffering and the rise of the Antichrist.
  • At the end of the tribulation, Christ will return to Earth to defeat the forces of evil in the Battle of Armageddon.
  • Following this, Christ will establish His millennial kingdom, reigning for a thousand years of peace and justice.
  • After the Millennium, there will be a final rebellion, followed by the last judgment and the creation of a new heaven and a new earth.

Influence on Evangelical and Fundamentalist Thought

Widespread Adoption: The Scofield Reference Bible became a staple in many evangelical and fundamentalist seminaries, churches, and homes, solidifying dispensationalism’s dominance in American evangelicalism.

Theological Education: Institutions such as Dallas Theological Seminary, including prominent figures like Dwight Pentecost and John F. Walvoord, and Moody Bible Institute became centers for dispensationalist teaching, training generations of pastors, theologians, and missionaries.

Popular Culture: Dispensationalist ideas have permeated popular culture, particularly through books like Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” and the “Left Behind” series by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, which present fictionalized accounts of the rapture and tribulation period.

Political Influence: Dispensationalist beliefs have influenced the political views of many evangelicals, particularly regarding support for the state of Israel, which is seen as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

Dispensationalist beliefs have significantly influenced the political views of many evangelicals, particularly regarding support for the state of Israel, which is seen as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. This theological perspective interprets the establishment of Israel in 1948 as a pivotal event in God’s prophetic timeline, intensifying evangelical support for Israel in both religious and political spheres.

Historical Context and Political Engagement

The late 20th century marked a shift from evangelical separatism to active political engagement, notably through the emergence of the Christian Right. Influential figures like Jerry Falwell, founder of the Moral Majority in 1979, emphasized unwavering support for Israel, viewing its existence as central to divine prophecy. Falwell’s trips to Israel, sponsored by the Israeli government, underscored this commitment, and he became a prominent advocate for pro-Israel U.S. foreign policy.

This period also saw the rise of dispensationalist literature, such as Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth,” which linked contemporary events to biblical prophecies, further galvanizing evangelical support for Israel. Such works suggested that geopolitical developments involving Israel were direct fulfillments of scripture, reinforcing the theological imperative to support the Jewish state.

Contemporary Political Influence

In recent years, dispensationalist beliefs continue to shape evangelical political perspectives. Support for Israel remains a pivotal issue, often influencing voting patterns and policy advocacy. For instance, during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, evangelical leaders emphasized the importance of backing Israel, equating it with other core issues like pro-life advocacy. Ralph Reed, founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, stated that support for Israel rivals pro-life issues in evangelical importance, highlighting the enduring impact of dispensationalist theology on political priorities.

Furthermore, political figures have recognized and appealed to this demographic. Former President Donald Trump, for example, acknowledged the strong support for Israel among evangelical Christians, noting that “Christians love Israel more than Jews.” This statement reflects the deep-seated theological convictions that drive evangelical support for Israel, rooted in dispensationalist interpretations of biblical prophecy.

Critiques and Considerations

While dispensationalist-driven support for Israel is significant, it is not without controversy. My concern here is that such theological perspectives can lead to uncritical political alliances, potentially overlooking complex geopolitical realities and ethical considerations. The intertwining of religious prophecy with foreign policy raises questions about the implications of basing political decisions on specific theological interpretations.

Dispensationalist beliefs have profoundly influenced evangelical political views, particularly regarding support for Israel. This theological framework interprets the modern state of Israel as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy, driving political engagement and shaping policy advocacy among evangelicals.

One of the telltale signs of this belief is the date-setting historicism of figures like Hal Lindsey (which I mentioned on my testimony podcast episode, if you remember) who identify current events as the fulfillment of biblical prophecies. Here are a few more examples to watch out for! 🚩

  • David Jeremiah: Senior pastor of Shadow Mountain Community Church and author of several books on prophecy and end times, Jeremiah is a well-known contemporary dispensationalist preacher.
  • Chuck Missler: Chuck Missler (1934-2018) was a prominent figure in evangelical Christian circles, known for his deep and often controversial insights into biblical prophecy and end times. He was the founder of Koinonia House, a ministry dedicated to providing biblical teaching through various media.
    • Key Points about Chuck Missler:
      • Biblical Prophecy and Eschatology: Missler was well-known for his detailed studies on the book of Revelation and other prophetic scriptures.
      • Integration of Science and Scripture: He often discussed topics like quantum physics, extraterrestrial life, and the technological advancements in relation to biblical texts, aiming to show that modern science supports the Bible. 🚩
      • Controversial Views: His unconventional perspectives sometimes placed him on the fringes of mainstream evangelical thought, making him a figure of interest in conspiracy theory circles.
      • Promoted by Conspiracy Pages: Missler’s work has found a following among conspiracy theorist communities, including social media accounts like kingkat2.0.
  • Thomas Ice: Executive Director of the Pre-Trib Research Center, Ice is a prominent scholar and proponent of dispensational premillennialism.
  • Dave Hunt: Known for his critical works on Catholicism, mysticism, and New Age practices, Hunt was an influential figure in evangelical circles. His books often weave biblical prophecy with contemporary events, painting a picture of a world on the brink of divine judgment. 🚩 Hunt’s tendency to overemphasize conspiratorial themes, such as connections between the Vatican and global control, exemplifies the merging of theological and speculative narratives.

So, what’s the bottom line?

These ideologies offer a simplistic worldview where believers feel part of an exclusive group with hidden knowledge and a righteous mission from the big guy upstairs. Conspiracies can provide a framework for interpreting the world and understanding perceived injustices or challenges. They often exploit feelings of fear, uncertainty, and distrust, portraying religious or ideological adversaries as sinister forces working against the believer’s values.

As someone who has walked this path, I want to shed light on how these patterns develop and how we can break free from their grip. In today’s episode, we’ll explore the tactics that draw people into these worlds, the warning signs to watch for, and most importantly, how to reclaim your sense of self and create a balanced, fulfilling life beyond the allure of quick fixes and easy answers.

So, whether you’re curious about the psychology behind these phenomena or looking to make sense of your own experiences, this episode is for you. Together, we’ll unravel the mysteries of these enticing yet dangerous dynamics, one thread at a time.

Whether it’s an MLM, a conspiracy theory, or a religious sect, they all have one thing in common—they thrive on manipulation and exploitation. 😈 From emotional vulnerabilities to charismatic leaders who skillfully manipulate followers, these groups use tactics designed to control and exploit individuals for their own gain.

They often prey on people’s fears, insecurities, and desires for belonging, creating an environment where critical thinking is suppressed, and loyalty is demanded. By promising quick solutions, ultimate truths, or exclusive knowledge, they ensnare individuals into cycles of dependence and obedience, all while profiting from their followers’ dedication and sacrifice.

High control religions often employ a variety of psychological techniques that can be categorized as brainwashing to maintain control over their members. These methods can be understood through the following key strategies:

1. Isolation

  • Physical Isolation: Members may be encouraged or required to live in communal settings away from the outside world, reducing their exposure to differing opinions.
  • Social Isolation: Members are often discouraged from associating with outsiders, including family and friends who are not part of the religion, leading to an echo chamber effect.

2. Control of Information

  • Censorship: Access to information, particularly from outside sources, is heavily restricted. Members are often told to avoid books, websites, and media that might criticize or contradict the group’s teachings.
  • Propaganda: The group provides a controlled flow of information that consistently reinforces its beliefs and practices. This includes frequent meetings, sermons, and literature that promote the group’s ideology.

3. Induced Dependency

  • Emotional Dependency: The group fosters a sense of dependency by portraying itself as the sole source of spiritual truth and salvation. Leaving the group is often presented as leading to spiritual ruin or eternal damnation.
  • Economic Dependency: Members might be financially dependent on the group through communal living, shared resources, or expectations to donate a significant portion of their income.

4. Manipulation of Emotions

  • Fear and Guilt: High control religions often use fear tactics, such as threats of punishment, divine retribution, or ostracism, to maintain control. Guilt is also used to manipulate members into conforming to group norms and practices.
  • Love Bombing: New members often receive an overwhelming amount of attention and affection, creating a sense of belonging and making them more receptive to the group’s influence.

5. Cognitive Dissonance

  • Conflicting Information: The group may present conflicting doctrines or teachings that create cognitive dissonance. Members are then encouraged to resolve this dissonance by accepting the group’s explanation or by attributing any doubts to their own lack of faith or understanding.
  • Repetitive Messaging: Constant repetition of the group’s ideology helps to internalize beliefs, making it harder for members to question or think critically about them.

6. Control of the Environment

  • Regulation of Environment: The group regulates the environment of its members through strict schedules, rituals, and practices. This control extends to aspects of daily life, including diet, dress, sleep, and social interactions.
  • Totalist Doctrine: The group’s doctrine is presented as the absolute and only truth. Any dissent or deviation is harshly punished or suppressed.

7. Loss of Identity OR Identity Confusion

  • Role Confusion: Members are often given new identities or roles that are closely tied to the group’s ideology. This can include new names, titles, or responsibilities that align with the group’s goals.
  • Erosion of Personal Boundaries: Personal boundaries are often dissolved, with the group demanding complete loyalty and submission to its leaders and teachings.

8. Exploitation of Psychological Vulnerabilities

  • Targeting Vulnerable Individuals: High control religions often target individuals who are experiencing personal crises, loneliness, or seeking meaning in life. These individuals are more susceptible to the group’s message and control techniques.
  • Gradual Indoctrination: The process of indoctrination is typically gradual, starting with mild teachings and escalating to more extreme beliefs and practices as the member becomes more deeply involved.

By employing these techniques, high control religions can significantly influence and control their members’ thoughts, emotions, and behaviors, creating a closed system that is resistant to outside influence and critical thinking.

Are you prepared to continue unraveling the mysteries? Tune into this episode as we delve further into… exposing the Impact of social media on Recruitment and Manipulation. Until then, maintain your curiosity, embrace skepticism, and keep tuning in! 🎙️🔒

For a deeper understanding of brainwashing and related psychological manipulation techniques, you can explore a variety of resources spanning books, academic papers, and credible online articles. Here are some notable recommendations:

### Books
1. **”Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism” by Robert Jay Lifton**: This seminal work offers a detailed examination of brainwashing techniques used during the Chinese thought reform programs.
2. **”Cults in Our Midst: The Hidden Menace in Our Everyday Lives” by Margaret Thaler Singer and Janja Lalich**: This book provides insights into the psychological mechanisms of cults and brainwashing.
3. **”Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion” by Robert B. Cialdini**: While not exclusively about brainwashing, this book explores the principles of influence and manipulation.
4. **”Combatting Cult Mind Control” by Steven Hassan**: This book by a former cult member and mental health counselor offers practical advice and personal insights into the process of mind control and how to counter it.

### Academic Articles
1. **”Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control” by Kathleen Taylor**: This article, and the book of the same name, delve into the scientific basis of brainwashing and its effects on the brain.
2. **”Psychological Coercion and Human Rights: Exploring the Notion of Brainwashing”**: Various academic journals explore the intersection of psychological coercion and human rights, providing theoretical and empirical insights.

### Online Resources
1. **The International Cultic Studies Association (ICSA)**: Their website offers a wealth of articles, research papers, and resources on brainwashing, mind control, and cultic studies.
2. **APA PsycNet**: The American Psychological Association’s database provides access to numerous scholarly articles on brainwashing and related topics.
3. **TED Talks and Documentaries**: Several TED Talks and documentaries explore the impact of psychological manipulation and brainwashing, offering both expert insights and personal stories.

By exploring these resources, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, effects, and countermeasures related to brainwashing.

#Brainwashing #MindControl #Awareness #StayInformed #Psychology #CriticalThinking #HighControlReligion #CultAwareness #KnowledgeIsPower #deconstruction #deconstructioncommunity #faith #podcast #endtimesbeliefs #taste0ftruthtuesdays

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, faith, JesusChrist, mental health, newagetojesus, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Understanding Hypermasculinity: Impacts on Society and Mental Health

Hypermasculinity is a psychological term describing the exaggeration of male stereotypical behavior, emphasizing traits such as physical strength, aggression, and sexuality.

It involves an overemphasis on traditional masculine traits and behaviors, often to the exclusion of traits considered less traditionally masculine, such as empathy and emotional expression.

Hypermasculinity can lead to harmful behaviors and attitudes, including misogyny, homophobia, and violence, and is often perpetuated by cultural norms and media representations.

🏴‍☠️A Meta-analysis of 39 studies found hyper masculinity to be one of the most powerful predictors of men’s likelihood to commit assault. 🏴‍☠️

Pastors like Mark Driscoll, John Piper, John MacArthur, Steven Furtick, Robert Jeffress (to name a few) emphasize traditional masculine characteristics while downplaying traits that they perceive as “soft” or non-conforming to traditional gender norms.

Hyper masculinity within the church can take various forms including:

1. **Emphasis on Aggression**: Promoting the idea that men should be aggressive, assertive, and dominant, which can lead to conflict and hostility rather than fostering understanding and compassion.

2. **Rigid Gender Roles**: Enforcing strict gender roles where men are expected to be the leaders and decision-makers while women are relegated to supporting roles, limiting both men and women’s potential within the church.

3. **Resistance to Vulnerability**: Discouraging men from showing vulnerability or seeking help, leading to emotional repression and isolation, which contradicts the Christian values of empathy and support.

4. **Denigration of Feminine Traits**: Devaluing traits traditionally associated with femininity, such as sensitivity or nurturing, and promoting a narrow view of masculinity that excludes these qualities.

5. **Preoccupation with Power and Control**: Focusing excessively on maintaining power and control within the church hierarchy, rather than promoting humility, servanthood, and cooperation.

6. **Misuse of Scripture**: Misinterpreting or selectively using biblical passages to justify patriarchal structures and behaviors, rather than interpreting them in a way that promotes equality and mutual respect.

Conservative churches EVERYWHERE may perpetuate hypermasculinity through various means, including:

  1. Gender Role Expectations: Conservative churches often promote traditional gender roles where men are expected to be strong, assertive leaders while women are expected to be nurturing and submissive. This reinforcement of rigid gender norms can contribute to the perpetuation of hypermasculine ideals.
  2. Preaching and Teaching: Sermons and teachings in conservative churches may emphasize masculine traits such as dominance, power, and control, while downplaying or devaluing traits traditionally associated with femininity. This messaging can reinforce hypermasculine behaviors and attitudes.
  3. Leadership Structure: Conservative churches may have hierarchical leadership structures where men hold positions of authority and power, while women are excluded from leadership roles or relegated to supporting roles. This reinforces the idea that leadership and authority are inherently masculine qualities.
  4. Socialization of Boys: Conservative churches may socialize boys from a young age to conform to hypermasculine ideals through youth groups, boys’ clubs, and other activities that emphasize competitiveness, toughness, and aggression.
  5. Response to Change: Conservative churches may resist societal changes that challenge traditional gender roles and masculinity, leading to a reinforcement of hypermasculine attitudes in response to perceived threats to traditional values.

Overall, conservative churches can contribute to the perpetuation of hypermasculinity through their teachings, practices, and socialization processes, which can have harmful effects on individuals and communities.

I hope by providing these examples it helps to illustrate how hyper masculinity within the church can distort Christian teachings and harm both individuals and the community as a whole.

#genderroles#biblicalwomanhood#biblicalmarriage#biblicalmanhood#deconstruction#deconstructioncommunity#traditionalgenderroles#tradwife#biblicalmasculinity#calvinism#submission#womensupportingwomen#genderequality#explorepage#marriage#johnmacarthur#markdriscoll#johnpiper#churchlife#chuches

SOURCES:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X17308571

To learn more about hypermasculinity and its societal impact, you can explore various academic journals, books, and online resources. Here are some recommendations:

  1. Academic Journals:
    • “Psychology of Men & Masculinities”
    • “Men and Masculinities”
    • “Journal of Gender Studies”
    • “Feminism & Psychology”
  2. Books:
    • “The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love” by bell hooks
    • “Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men” by Michael Kimmel
    • “Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era” by Michael Kimmel
    • “The Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help” by Jackson Katz
    • “Raising Cain: Protecting the Emotional Life of Boys” by Dan Kindlon and Michael Thompson
  3. Online Resources:
    • Websites of organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA) or the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) often have articles and resources related to masculinity and mental health.
    • TED Talks and YouTube channels featuring talks by psychologists, sociologists, and activists discussing masculinity and its impact on society.
    • Online forums and communities where individuals share personal experiences and insights about masculinity and gender roles.

These resources provide a range of perspectives and insights into hypermasculinity and its effects on individuals and society.

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, christianfaith, deconstruction, faith, holistic health, JesusChrist, mental health, nervous system, new age spiritual, newagetojesus, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Challenging Complementarianism in the Church: Uncovering Harmful Gender Ideologies

The idea of biblical womanhood is more about human power structures than the message of Christ. When we examine church history, we can challenge the notion that this belief is inherently biblical.

In the early Christian church, there are several examples of female apostles and leaders:

  1. Mary Magdalene: Mary Magdalene is one of the most prominent figures in the New Testament and is often referred to as the “apostle to the apostles.” She was present at Jesus’ crucifixion, burial, and resurrection, and she was the first to witness the risen Christ and announce his resurrection to the disciples.
  2. Priscilla: Priscilla, along with her husband Aquila, played a significant role in the early Christian church. They are mentioned several times in the New Testament, often as fellow workers with Paul. Priscilla is commended for her teaching and ministry alongside her husband.
  3. Junia: Junia is mentioned by Paul in his letter to the Romans as being “outstanding among the apostles.” This indicates that she held a significant leadership role in the early church and was recognized by Paul as a fellow apostle.
  4. Phoebe: Phoebe is mentioned by Paul in his letter to the Romans as a deaconess or servant of the church in Cenchreae. She is commended for her service to the church and is likely to have held a leadership role.

These are just a few examples of the many women who played important roles in the early Christian church as apostles, leaders, and ministers. Their contributions highlight the diversity and inclusivity of the early Christian community.

The conservative ⛪️ promotes dangerous ideologies-women submitting to men aka Complementarianism.

This ideology has connections to movements like the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW), which promotes complementarianism and traditional gender roles within conservative Evangelicalism.

This started the rise of New Calvinism, spearheaded by influential figures such as John Piper, John MacArthur, and Mark Driscoll, further reinforcing these gender roles. 🚩

Female gender norms that emphasize tenderness over assertiveness hinder women’s ability to assert themselves and address unfair treatment effectively.

🚨 Women submitting to their husband is a dangerous ideology. 🚨

A major cause of s*xual mistreatment is societal: the structural inequality that gives men power over women. 

The IFS report that showed that conservative highly religious men were far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence.

🏴‍☠️A Meta-analysis of 39 studies found hyper-masculinity to be one of the most powerful predictors of men’s likelihood to commit assault. 🏴‍☠️

Couples where the husband dominated decision-making were 2.6 times more likely to experience lower marital satisfaction compared to those who made decisions collaboratively.

This is why ab*se is so common in the ⛪️.

It’s the theology that’s bad. Not just how it’s interpreted.

As I’ve said before, it was deeply painful, realizing I had been influenced by the dangerous lies behind Nancy Pearcey’s book The Toxic War on Masculinity. Which was heavily promoted by David Wolcott, Alisa Childers, Alexa Clark & Frank Turek, who are often associated with right-wing fundamentalist Christianity. 🚩

She said “There’s no need to debate complementarianism or egalitarianism when it comes to marriage” 𝔸𝕔𝕥𝕦𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 ℕ𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕪, 𝕎𝕖 𝔻𝕠! Pearcey pulls findings from Gottman’s work, citing that in both egalitarian & hierarchical marriages “emotionally intelligent husbands have figured out the one big thing: how to convey honor and respect.” Thus, she claims, labels don’t matter.

However, she omits to mention the big finding Gottman uses to frame this entire chapter: Complementarian men only do well when they don’t act out hierarchy and put aside their beliefs. You can’t claim beliefs in complementarianism are irrelevant by quoting someone who found acting out those beliefs is disastrous.

This is only ONE of the major criticisms of the book pointing to the lack of empirical evidence to support the claims made in the book, particularly regarding the alleged “war on masculinity.” For more read this!

🚨 We should consider the consequences of promoting ideological narratives without empirical support. 🚨

The liberation of women from oppression is crucial for fostering a more equitable and just society.

When women are liberated, they can fully contribute their talents, perspectives, and skills to all aspects of life, including politics, economics, and culture. This liberation not only benefits women individually but also lead to societal progress by dismantling systemic barriers and promoting inclusivity.

Moreover, when women are empowered, it creates a ripple effect, positively impacting families, communities, and future generations. Ultimately, achieving gender equality and women’s liberation is essential for building a more prosperous and harmonious world for all.

Sources: Sheila Wray Gregoire and Joanna Sawatsky

For more ℹ️
•The Bible vs Biblical womanhood by Philip Payne critically examines the concept of “biblical womanhood” and challenges traditional interpretations of scripture that restrict the roles and authority of women in the church. Payne argues that many teachings on gender roles are based on cultural assumptions rather than biblical principles. He examines key passages in the Bible that are often used to support the subjugation of women and offers alternative interpretations that affirm the equality and dignity of women. Payne’s work is a scholarly exploration of the biblical texts related to gender and offers a fresh perspective on the role of women in the church and society.
•Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters by Philip Barton Payne Philip Barton Payne is a comprehensive exploration of the biblical teachings regarding gender equality and roles within the Christian community. Payne examines Paul’s letters with a focus on understanding the true meaning behind passages often used to support hierarchical gender relationships. He argues that Paul’s writings affirm the equality of men and women in Christ and that traditional interpretations promoting male authority over women are based on misunderstandings or misinterpretations. Payne provides exegetical analysis and theological insights to support his argument, offering a scholarly perspective on gender equality within the church. Overall, the book challenges traditional views on gender roles and provides a compelling case for the equality of men and women in Christ.
•Terran Williams’-How God Sees Women-explores the biblical perspective on the role and value of women in Christianity. Through a careful examination of scripture, Williams challenges traditional interpretations that have marginalized women and restricted their participation in religious life. He argues that God views women as equal partners with men in his divine plan and emphasizes the importance of empowering women within the church. Williams’ work offers a refreshing and inclusive perspective on gender equality within Christianity, inviting readers to reconsider their understanding of women’s roles in faith and society
•The Making of Biblical Womanhood How the Subjugation of Women became Gospel Truth by Beth Allison Barr This book explores the historical development of gender roles within Christianity. Barr delves into the roots of traditional teachings on gender roles, revealing how they evolved over time and became ingrained as gospel truth. Drawing on historical research, Barr challenges the notion that traditional gender roles are biblical, arguing that they are instead products of cultural and theological developments. She examines key historical figures and events that shaped these teachings, shedding light on the ways in which women’s roles have been subjugated within the church. Ultimately, Barr advocates for a more egalitarian interpretation of scripture and a reevaluation of traditional teachings on gender within Christianity. Her book offers a thought-provoking critique of gender hierarchy in the church and calls for a reexamination of biblical womanhood.
•Marg Mowczko’s work focuses on biblical studies and gender equality within Christianity. Through her writing and research, she explores various passages of scripture to challenge traditional interpretations that have limited the roles of women in the church. Mowczko argues for a more inclusive understanding of women’s participation in ministry, leadership, and theological scholarship. She highlights the presence of female leaders, apostles, and prophets in the early Christian church, advocating for their recognition and empowerment in contemporary religious communities. Mowczko’s work contributes to ongoing discussions about gender equality and biblical interpretation, inspiring readers to reevaluate their understanding of women’s roles in faith and spirituality.

MORE SOURCES: The IFS report that showed that conservative highly religious men were far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence (p. 36):
-https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/reports/worldfamilymap-2019-051819.pdf
-https://baptistnews.com/article/do-complementarian-men-do-better-a-response-to-nancy-pearcey/
-https://leo-cruz.medium.com/nancy-pearcey-pt1-44f98c2a3602

#deconstruction#deconstructioncommunity#genderroles#biblicalfemininity#biblicalwomanhood#biblicalwomanhood#badtheologykills#calvinism#womenempowerment#women#womensupportingwomen#explorepage

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, faith, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Sugar, Spice and Everything Nice….

Exploring the Intersection of Gender Roles, Christianity, and Dominion Theology: A Critical Look at Contemporary Teachings

Exploring the Intersection of Gender Roles, Christianity, & Dominion Theology: A Critical Look at Contemporary Teachings 🤔

Delving into history, we explore the nuanced connections between nursery rhymes, biblical teachings on women’s roles, and contemporary controversies.

These ideas find support in movements like the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW), which advocate for complementarianism and traditional gender norms within conservative Evangelicalism.

This started the rise of New Calvinism, spearheaded by influential figures such as John Piper, John MacArthur, and Mark Driscoll, further reinforcing these gender roles.

Moreover, dominion theology, which seeks to establish a Christian-led government based on biblical law, is closely associated with these movements.

We uncover how interpretations of women’s roles in the church have been shaped by power dynamics rather than the teachings of Christ.

Nancy Pearcey’s recent controversial claim that women’s suffrage was a net loss highlights the connection between such ideologies and dominionism or Christian nationalism.

In the podcast episode, we delve into the connections between dominion theology, far-right fundamentalism, Pearcey’s controversial assertions, and more.

Join us as we unravel the complexities of gender, religion, and power in contemporary Christianity.🎙️

Tune in! 🎧

Sources:
•‘Sugar and spice’ versus ‘Frogs and snails’ – Not Only Pink and Blue
•WAITING FOR HER KNIGHT: GENDER STEREOTYPES IN FAIRYTALES – Jaipur Literature Festival
•Nursery Rhymes: A Perfect Example of the Perpetuation of Sexism in Society – Dr. Bethany Cook (doctorbethanycook.com)
•https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/reports/worldfamilymap-2019-051819.pdf pg 36
•https://baptistnews.com/article/do-complementarian-men-do-better-a-response-to-nancy-pearcey/
•https://leo-cruz.medium.com/nancy-pearcey-pt1-44f98c2a3602 When apologetics debases historical memory | Medium
•Gottman Institute
•The Bible vs Biblical womanhood by Philip Payne
•Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters by Philip Barton Payne
•The Making of Biblical womanhood How the subjugation of women became gospel truth by Beth Allison Barr

#ChurchHistory#ChristianNationalism#GenderStereotypes#PodcastDiscussion
#calvinism#biblicalwomanhood#biblicalfemininity#biblicalliving#biblicalmarriage#deconstruction#genderequality

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, faith, holistic health, mental health, new age spiritual, newagetojesus, nutrition, physiology, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview

Understanding Religious Trauma: Causes, Symptoms, and Healing

“Another wave of rejection surfaced when people either shamed us for not being in church or stopped talking to us all together. It left me wondering whether I was truly accepted by God–his people surely weren’t making me feel that way, except when I did what they wanted me to do” -Karl Forehand Out into the Desert

The Deconstruction of Christianity is something I’ve heard of since stepping into the world of theology, but I never thought I’d find myself smack dab in the middle of the movement.  #deconstructioncommunity

Disentangling or #deconstruction is a phenomenon where individuals, often within the Christian faith, critically reevaluate their beliefs, doctrines, and practices. This process involves questioning and challenging long-held assumptions, teachings, and traditions within Christianity, with the goal of arriving at a more authentic and personally meaningful understanding of #faith.

The 𝑓𝑒𝑎𝑟 of rejection from God, from others, and actual rejection from others can feel suffocating as negative emotions become all consuming.

The feeling of loneliness when working through one’s doubts, questions and the decision to move away from harmful religious teachings can feel unbearable.

#Religioustrauma refers to psychological, emotional, or social harm caused by religious beliefs, practices, or communities.

Here are some quick facts:

1. **Definition**: It encompasses experiences of guilt, shame, fear, and anxiety resulting from religious teachings, practices, or communities.

2. **Causes**: It can stem from rigid dogma, abusive religious leaders, or pressure to conform to specific beliefs.

3. **Symptoms**: Symptoms may include anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, and difficulty trusting others.

4. **Triggers**: Certain events or experiences may trigger religious trauma, such as leaving a religious community, questioning beliefs, or encountering religious lingo.

5. **Treatment**: Treatment often involves therapy, support groups, and finding new sources of meaning and community.

6. **Impact**: Religious trauma can have long-lasting effects on individuals’ mental health, relationships, and sense of identity.

7. **Awareness**: Awareness of religious trauma is growing, leading to more resources and support for those affected.

“Religious trauma is the emotional and psychological damage caused by harmful religious experiences or teachings. It can result from authoritarianism, legalism, fear-based theology, and other forms of spiritual abuse.”

“Deconstruction often involves revisiting and reevaluating one’s religious upbringing, which can bring to light past trauma and contribute to healing.”

“The deconstruction movement recognizes the importance of addressing religious trauma and creating safe spaces for individuals to explore their beliefs without fear of judgment or retribution.”

“For many, deconstruction is not just about questioning beliefs, but also about processing and healing from religious trauma.”

“Navigating the deconstruction journey can be challenging, especially for those who have experienced religious trauma. It requires courage, self-compassion, and support from others who understand.”

The book When Religion Hurts you has served as a beacon of support and empowerment for those of us who are navigating the complexities of disentanglement from restrictive religious beliefs. It offers validation, guidance, and solidarity to individuals who are embarking on this journey.

Thank you @drlauraeanderson ❤️‍🩹

If you’re looking for more! Please check out these support groups:

https://www.soyouredeconstructing.com/communities

https://www.disrupted.church/becomeadisruptor

Home
The New Evangelicals website

 #deconstructingfaith #trauma #traumainformed #traumahealing #spiritualgrowth #spiritualjourney #church #churchhurt #purityculture #faithtrauma #faith #community #growth #explorepage

Posted on in Bible, biblicalworldview, challenges, christianfaith, deconstruction, faith, mental health, nutrition, physiology, podcast, scripture, spiritualabuse, testimonies, theology, wordofgod, worldview

 A Critique of Nancy Pearcey’s book “Toxic War on Masculinity”

“Complementarian men only do well when they don’t act out hierarchy and put aside their beliefs.” John Gottman of the world-renowned Gottman Institute.

A big part of my deconstruction process was realizing the dangerous lies behind Nancy Pearcey’s book The Toxic War on Masculinity. Which was heavily promoted by David Wolcott, Alisa Childers, Alexa Clark & Frank Turek, who are often associated with right-wing fundamentalist Christianity. 🚩It was such a disappointment to find out that this book, touted as a high quality, scholarly work, was clearly just an opinion piece full of logical fallacies, misrepresentation of research data, and poor quality (non-peer reviewed) sources.

She said “There’s no need to debate complementarianism or egalitarianism when it comes to marriage” 𝔸𝕔𝕥𝕦𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 ℕ𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕪, 𝕎𝕖 𝔻𝕠!

Pearcey pulls findings from Gottman’s work, citing that in both egalitarian & hierarchical marriages “emotionally intelligent husbands have figured out the one big thing: how to convey honor and respect.” Thus, she claims, labels don’t matter.

However, she omits to mention the big finding Gottman uses to frame this entire chapter: Complementarian men only do well when they don’t act out hierarchy and put aside their beliefs. You can’t claim beliefs in complementarianism are irrelevant by quoting someone who found acting out those beliefs is disastrous.

This is only ONE of the major criticisms of the book pointing to the lack of empirical evidence to support the claims made in the book, particularly regarding the alleged “war on masculinity.”

🚨 We should consider the consequences of promoting ideological narratives without empirical support. 🚨

Other concerns but not limited to:

  • Oversimplification of Gender Issues: Critics argue that Pearcey’s book oversimplifies complex gender issues by framing them as a “war on masculinity.” They suggest that this framing perpetuates a binary view of gender and fails to adequately address the diverse experiences and identities of individuals across the gender spectrum.
  • Perpetuating Gender Stereotypes: Critics contend that Pearcey’s characterization of masculinity as under attack reinforces traditional gender stereotypes and norms, which may contribute to harmful social expectations and restricts the freedom of individuals to express their gender identity authentically.
  • Lack of Intersectionality: Some critics argue that Pearcey’s analysis lacks intersectionality, as it fails to consider how factors such as race, class, sexuality, and disability intersect with gender to shape individuals’ experiences and social realities. This omission may result in a limited understanding of the complexity of gender dynamics.
  • Ideological Bias: Some critics suggest that Pearcey’s perspective reflects a conservative or right-wing ideological bias, as she tends to frame gender issues within a traditional Christian worldview. This ideological framing may alienate readers with different religious or philosophical beliefs and limit the book’s appeal to a narrow audience.

Click to watch THIS VIDEO–>Dr. Nancy Pearcey, author of ‘The Toxic War on Masculinity’ claimed in a recent podcast interview that women’s suffrage was a net loss and that Christian marriages are healthier than their non-christian counterparts. Tim brings on Sheila Gregoire, author of ‘The Great Sex Rescue’ and her co-author Rebecca Gregoire Lindenbach, along with Dr. Beth Allison Barr, author of ‘The Making of Biblical Womanhood’ to respond.

Nancy claimed in the book and on a podcast interview that women’s suffrage was a net loss!!!! This is dominionism aka Christian Nationalism.

This is a whole ‘nother rabbit hole, connected to the TRAD wife movement/conservative resurgence… let’s get into it a bit….

Beginning in 1979, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) experienced an intense struggle for control of the organization. Its initiators called it the conservative resurgence while its detractors labeled it the fundamentalist takeover. It was launched with the charge that the seminaries and denominational agencies were dominated by liberals. The movement was primarily aimed at reorienting the denomination away from a liberal trajectory.

This led to the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) At a 1986 meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society (ETS), Wayne Grudem gave a speech on “Manhood and Womanhood in Biblical and Theological Perspectives” in which he invited delegates to join “a new organization dedicated to upholding both equality and differences between men and women in marriage and the church.”[11] This was followed by a meeting in Dallas with Grudem, John Piper etc.  

A subsequent meeting was held in Danvers, Massachusetts; at this meeting, the Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood was finalized. coining the term “complementarianism” in 1988.

This is connected to New Calvinism, also known as the Young, Restless, and Reformed Movement, is a movement within conservative Evangelicalism that reinterprets 16th century Calvinism under contemporary US values and ideologies.

The New Calvinism movement started in the 1980s, with the founding of the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood in 1987 in the United States, which stresses the complementarianism between men and women (in contrast to egalitarianism, and as opposed to feminism). The teaching of covenant theology (as opposed to Wesleyanism, or Arminian theology), a rejection of dispensationalism, and a church governance by male elders are also hallmarks of the movement.

The movement gained wider publicity with a conference held in Louisville, Kentucky, in 2006, Together for the Gospel by American pastors John Piper, Mark Driscoll, John MacArthur, Matt Chandler, Al Mohler, Mark Dever and CJ Mahaney. In March 2009, Time magazine ranked it as one of the “10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now”, while questioning if “more Christians searching for security will submit their wills to the austerely demanding God of their country’s infancy”.

Dominion theology, also known as dominionism, is a group of Christian political ideologies that seek to institute a nation governed by Christians and based on their understandings of biblical law. Extents of rule and ways of acquiring governing authority are varied. For example, dominion theology can include theonomy but does not necessarily involve advocacy of adherence to the Mosaic Law as the basis of government. The label is primarily applied to groups of Christians in the United States.

Prominent adherents of those ideologies include Calvinist Christian reconstructionism, Charismatic and Pentecostal Kingdom Now theology, and the New Apostolic Reformation. On the podcast we talk more about Dominion Theology & it’s connections to far right fundamentalists aka Christian nationalist and Nancy’s book.

https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/B9rouAoTiJb
🎧Tune in for more!

For further reading:
•The Bible vs Biblical womanhood by Philip Payne
•Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters by Philip Barton Payne
•Terran Williams’ Book How God Sees Women
•The Making of Biblical Womanhood How the Subjugation of Women became Gospel Truth by Beth Allison Barr
•Marg Mowczko’s work

👇🏻Sources: Sheila Wray Gregoire and Joanna Sawatsky 👇🏻 👇🏻

The IFS report that showed that conservative highly religious men were far more likely to perpetrate intimate partner violence (p. 36):

Click to access worldfamilymap-2019-051819.pdf

Do complementarian men do better? A response to Nancy Pearcey

https://leo-cruz.medium.com/nancy-pearcey-pt1-44f98c2a3602

MORE Resources: – Susan Ware, Why They Marched: Untold Stories of the Women Who Fought for the Right to Vote (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press) – Anita Anand, Sophia: Princess, Suffragette, Revolutionary (New York: Bloomsbury) – Manuela Thurner, “’Better Citizens without the Ballot’: American AntiSuffrage Women and Their Rationale During the Progressive Era,” Journal of Women’s History 5:1 (Spring 1993), 33-60 – Hallie Rubenhold, The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper (New York: Mariner Books An Imprint of HarperCollins) – Martha S. Jones, Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All (New York: Basic Books)

#churchhurt #SpiritualAbuse #HidingHurts #SpeakUp #BreakTheSilence #ProtectTheInnocent #HealingJourney #AuthenticConversations #CommunitySupport #FindYourVoice #ChurchDisrupted #Podcast #christian #christianity #religioustrauma #honestyheals
#deconstructioncommunity #deconstruction #deconstructingfaith #disentanglement #patriarchy #crushthepatriarchy #egalitarian #egalitarianism #complementarianism